Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:10:58 +0200
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:29:27 +0200
Michel Bovani <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Le 29/07/02 12:34, « Jens-Uwe Morawski » <email@example.com> a écrit :
> > - there seems to be a bug in the cm-super fonts.
> What you describe is not a bug, (but...) :
> ae (virtual) fonts use cmr-7bits at driver level, and in ss family,
> cmr-7bits does not exist at 500-design size, so 800 is used...
ahh. okay, now i see.
> What may be compared is \tiny\sffamily with cm-super and with ec-family mf
> fonts (suppress or comment the entry in the map for testing) : it will be
> the same (and may be ugly, yes...).
hmm, i agree that the ec fonts a similar to the cm-super. Thus i see
that it is not a bug. but still i cannot understand that sfss0600 and
sfss0500 should be fonts from the same font family. but here it not
the place to discuss this.