Non-free return to the fold
Fri, 02 Jul 1999 14:26:22 -0700
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> pity we can't have the new RevTeX on there. no chance, I suppose?
You can certainly have the current revtex4-beta. That package is already up on
CTAN, and the APS wants it to be under LPPL, I think.
> Mark Doyle wrote:
> > Approval. The next rev of REVTeX will be under LPPL, I expect.
The new REVTeX will be the release revtex4, and that is some weeks off at
least, so I think it will not make the cut.
As of this AM, the following are approved:
and the following are pending (the emails have been sent and have not bounced):
We are about to go into a long weekend here (something of great significance
to our Federal Government happened on a nearby date, so 9-to=5ers get hols).
This will account for Hafner's silence. As for the rest, who knows?