texlive[45866] Master/texmf-dist: kantlipsum (20nov17)
commits+karl at tug.org
commits+karl at tug.org
Mon Nov 20 23:01:34 CET 2017
Revision: 45866
http://tug.org/svn/texlive?view=revision&revision=45866
Author: karl
Date: 2017-11-20 23:01:33 +0100 (Mon, 20 Nov 2017)
Log Message:
-----------
kantlipsum (20nov17)
Modified Paths:
--------------
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.pdf
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.dtx
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.ins
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.sty
Added Paths:
-----------
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kantlipsum/README.md
Removed Paths:
-------------
trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kantlipsum/README
Deleted: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kantlipsum/README
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kantlipsum/README 2017-11-20 22:01:07 UTC (rev 45865)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kantlipsum/README 2017-11-20 22:01:33 UTC (rev 45866)
@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
-The kantlipsum package spits out sentences in Kantian style provided
-by the "Kant generator for Python" by Mark Pilgrim, described in the
-book "Dive into Python".
-
-This is version 0.6 of the package
-
-Changes from earlier version:
-
-The `index' option for writing index entries has been added; the
-code has been polished.
-
- Copyright 2011-2012 Enrico Gregorio
-
- It may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the
- LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL), either version 1.3c of this
- license or (at your option) any later version. The latest version
- of this license is in the file
-
- http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
-
- Author: Enrico Gregorio
- Enrico dot Gregorio at univr dot it
-
- This work has the LPPL maintenance status "author-maintained".
-
- This work consists of the following files:
-
-README (this file)
-kantlipsum.dtx
-kantlipsum.ins
-kantlipsum.pdf
-
- and of the derived file
-
-kantlipsum.sty
-
-To install the distribution:
-
-o run "latex kantlipsum.ins"
-o move "kantlipsum.sty" to locations where LaTeX will find
- it (the FAQ on CTAN in /help/uktug-FAQ gives more
- information about this magic place
-
-2012/10/14
-Enrico Gregorio
Added: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kantlipsum/README.md
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kantlipsum/README.md (rev 0)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kantlipsum/README.md 2017-11-20 22:01:33 UTC (rev 45866)
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+The kantlipsum package spits out sentences in Kantian style provided
+by the "Kant generator for Python" by Mark Pilgrim, described in the
+book "Dive into Python".
+
+This is version 0.6 of the package
+
+Changes from earlier version:
+
+The `index' option for writing index entries has been added; the
+code has been polished.
+
+ Copyright 2011-2012 Enrico Gregorio
+
+ It may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the
+ LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL), either version 1.3c of this
+ license or (at your option) any later version. The latest version
+ of this license is in the file
+
+ http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+
+ Author: Enrico Gregorio
+ Enrico dot Gregorio at univr dot it
+
+ This work has the LPPL maintenance status "author-maintained".
+
+ This work consists of the following files:
+
+README (this file)
+kantlipsum.dtx
+kantlipsum.ins
+kantlipsum.pdf
+
+ and of the derived file
+
+kantlipsum.sty
+
+To install the distribution:
+
+o run "latex kantlipsum.ins"
Property changes on: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kantlipsum/README.md
___________________________________________________________________
Added: svn:eol-style
## -0,0 +1 ##
+native
\ No newline at end of property
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.pdf
===================================================================
(Binary files differ)
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.dtx
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.dtx 2017-11-20 22:01:07 UTC (rev 45865)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.dtx 2017-11-20 22:01:33 UTC (rev 45866)
@@ -1,33 +1,113 @@
% \iffalse meta-comment
-%
-%% File: kantlipsum.dtx (C) Copyright 2011-2012 Enrico Gregorio
-%%
-%% It may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the
-%% LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL), either version 1.3c of this
-%% license or (at your option) any later version. The latest version
-%% of this license is in the file
-%%
-%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
-%%
-%% This file is part of the "kantlipsum bundle" (The Work in LPPL)
-%% and all files in that bundle must be distributed together.
-%%
-%% The released version of this bundle is available from CTAN.
-%%
-%
+%<*internal>
+\iffalse
+%</internal>
+%<*readme>
+The kantlipsum package spits out sentences in Kantian style provided
+by the "Kant generator for Python" by Mark Pilgrim, described in the
+book "Dive into Python".
+
+This is version 0.6 of the package
+
+Changes from earlier version:
+
+The `index' option for writing index entries has been added; the
+code has been polished.
+
+ Copyright 2011-2012 Enrico Gregorio
+
+ It may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the
+ LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL), either version 1.3c of this
+ license or (at your option) any later version. The latest version
+ of this license is in the file
+
+ http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+
+ Author: Enrico Gregorio
+ Enrico dot Gregorio at univr dot it
+
+ This work has the LPPL maintenance status "author-maintained".
+
+ This work consists of the following files:
+
+README (this file)
+kantlipsum.dtx
+kantlipsum.ins
+kantlipsum.pdf
+
+ and of the derived file
+
+kantlipsum.sty
+
+To install the distribution:
+
+o run "latex kantlipsum.ins"
+%</readme>
+%<*internal>
+\fi
+\def\nameofplainTeX{plain}
+\ifx\fmtname\nameofplainTeX\else
+ \expandafter\begingroup
+\fi
+%</internal>
+%<*install>
+\input l3docstrip.tex
+\keepsilent
+\askforoverwritefalse
+\preamble
+---------------------------------------------------------------
+The kantlipsum package --- Generate text in Kantian style
+Maintained by Enrico Gregorio
+E-mail: enrico DOT gregorio AT univr DOT it
+Released under the LaTeX Project Public License v1.3c or later
+See http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+---------------------------------------------------------------
+\endpreamble
+\postamble
+Copyright (C) 2011-2017 by
+ Enrico Gregorio
+ enrico DOT gregorio AT univr DOT it
+
+It may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the
+LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL), either version 1.3c of this
+license or (at your option) any later version. The latest version
+of this license is in the file
+ http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+This work consists of the file kantlipsum.dtx
+ and the derived files kantlipsum.pdf,
+ kantlipsum.sty and
+ kantlipsum.ins.
+\endpostamble
+\usedir{tex/latex/kantlipsum}
+\generate{
+ \file{\jobname.sty}{\from{\jobname.dtx}{package}}
+}
+%</install>
+%<install>\endbatchfile
+%<*internal>
+\usedir{source/latex/kantlipsum}
+\generate{
+ \file{\jobname.ins}{\from{\jobname.dtx}{install}}
+}
+\nopreamble\nopostamble
+\usedir{doc/latex/kantlipsum}
+\generate{
+ \file{README.md}{\from{\jobname.dtx}{readme}}
+}
+\ifx\fmtname\nameofplainTeX
+ \expandafter\endbatchfile
+\else
+ \expandafter\endgroup
+\fi
+%</internal>
%<*driver|package>
-\RequirePackage{expl3}
+\RequirePackage{expl3}[2017/11/14]
+\RequirePackage{xparse}
%</driver|package>
%<*driver>
-\expandafter\def\csname ver at thumbpdf.sty\endcsname{}
\documentclass[a4paper,full]{l3doc}
\usepackage{bookmark}
-%</driver>
-%<*driver|package>
-\GetIdInfo$Id: kantlipsum.dtx 0.6 2012-10-14 12:00:00Z Enrico $
- {Dummy text in Kantian style}
-%</driver|package>
-%<*driver>
+\usepackage{kantlipsum}
\begin{document}
\DocInput{\jobname.dtx}
\end{document}
@@ -34,10 +114,12 @@
%</driver>
% \fi
%
+% \GetFileInfo{\jobname.sty}
+%
% \title{^^A
% The \textsf{kantlipsum} package\\ Dummy text in Kantian style^^A
-% \thanks{This file describes version \ExplFileVersion,
-% last revised \ExplFileDate.}^^A
+% \thanks{This file describes version \fileversion,
+% last revised \filedate.}^^A
% }
%
% \author{^^A
@@ -44,16 +126,23 @@
% Enrico Gregorio\thanks
% {^^A
% E-mail:
-% Enrico DOT Gregorio AT univr DOT it^^A
+% \texttt{Enrico DOT Gregorio AT univr DOT it}^^A
% }^^A
% }
%
-% \date{Released \ExplFileDate}
+% \date{Released \filedate}
%
% \maketitle
%
+%\changes{v0.5}{2011/12/23}{First released version}
+%\changes{v0.6}{2012/10/14}{Fixes for kernel changes}
+%\changes{v0.6}{2012/10/14}{Added functions for producing an index}
+%\changes{v0.7}{2017/11/16}{Use new kernel function}
+%
% \begin{documentation}
%
+% \section{Introduction}
+%
% The \pkg{kantlipsum} package is modeled after \pkg{lipsum} and
% offers pretty similar functionality, but instead of pseudolatin
% utterances, it typesets paragraphs of nonsense in Kantian style
@@ -66,6 +155,10 @@
% problematic. On the contrary, the paragraphs are rather long, as
% it's common in philosophical prose.
%
+% \section{Example}
+%
+% \kant[1-3]
+%
% \section{Options}
%
% The package has four document options, the first two of which are
@@ -142,6 +235,11 @@
% The most striking change is the possibility to generate an index:
% each paragraph indexes one of its words or phrases.
%
+% \subsection*{Changes from version 0.6}
+%
+% Maintenance release with new functions from \texttt{expl3}. Now
+% a kernel released on 2017/11/14 or later is required.
+%
% \end{documentation}
%
% \begin{implementation}
@@ -148,25 +246,33 @@
%
% \section{\pkg{kantlipsum} implementation}
%
-% \iffalse
+% \begin{macrocode}
%<*package>
-% \fi
+% \end{macrocode}
%
% \begin{macrocode}
+%<@@=kgl>
+% \end{macrocode}
+%
+%
+% \begin{macrocode}
\ProvidesExplPackage
- {\ExplFileName}{\ExplFileDate}{\ExplFileVersion}{\ExplFileDescription}
+ {kantlipsum}
+ {2017/11/16}
+ {0.7}
+ {Generate text in Kantian style}
% \end{macrocode}
%
% A check to make sure that \pkg{expl3} is not too old
% \begin{macrocode}
-\@ifpackagelater { expl3 } { 2012/07/15 }
+\@ifpackagelater { expl3 } { 2017/11/14 }
{ }
{
- \PackageError { kantlipsum } { Support~package~l3kernel~too~old. }
+ \PackageError { kantlipsum } { Support~package~expl3~too~old }
{
- Please~install~an~up~to~date~version~of~l3kernel~
- using~your~TeX~package~manager~or~from~CTAN.\\ \\
- Loading~xparse~will~abort!
+ You~need~to~update~your~installation~of~the~bundles~
+ 'l3kernel'~and~'l3packages'.\MessageBreak
+ Loading~kantlipsum~will~abort!
}
\tex_endinput:D
}
@@ -174,40 +280,35 @@
%
% \subsection{Package options and required packages}
% We declare the allowed options and choose by default
-% \texttt{par}. We also need to declare a function |\kgl_number:n|
+% \texttt{par}. We also need to declare a function |\@@_number:n|
% that is set by the \texttt{numbers} option; its default action is to
% gobble its argument.
% \begin{macrocode}
\DeclareOption { par }
{
- \cs_set_protected:Nn \kgl_star: { \c_space_tl }
- \cs_set_protected:Nn \kgl_nostar: { \par }
+ \cs_set_protected:Nn \@@_star: { \c_space_tl }
+ \cs_set_protected:Nn \@@_nostar: { \par }
}
\DeclareOption{ nopar }
{
- \cs_set_protected:Nn \kgl_star: { \par }
- \cs_set_protected:Nn \kgl_nostar: { \c_space_tl }
+ \cs_set_protected:Nn \@@_star: { \par }
+ \cs_set_protected:Nn \@@_nostar: { \c_space_tl }
}
\DeclareOption{ numbers }
- { \cs_set_protected:Nn \kgl_number:n { #1\nobreakspace\textbullet\nobreakspace } }
+ { \cs_set_protected:Nn \@@_number:n { #1\nobreak\enspace\textbullet\nobreak\enspace } }
-\bool_new:N \g_kgl_makeindex_bool
-\bool_gset_false:N \g_kgl_makeindex_bool
+\bool_new:N \g_@@_makeindex_bool
+\bool_gset_false:N \g_@@_makeindex_bool
\DeclareOption{ index }
- { \bool_gset_true:N \g_kgl_makeindex_bool }
+ { \bool_gset_true:N \g_@@_makeindex_bool }
-\cs_new_eq:NN \kgl_number:n \use_none:n
+\cs_new_eq:NN \@@_number:n \use_none:n
\ExecuteOptions{par}
\ProcessOptions \scan_stop:
% \end{macrocode}
%
-% The \pkg{xparse} package is required.
-% \begin{macrocode}
-\RequirePackage{xparse}
-% \end{macrocode}
-%
% \subsection{Messages}
% We define two messages.
% \begin{macrocode}
@@ -221,15 +322,15 @@
% \end{macrocode}
%
% \subsection{Variables and constants}
-% The |\l_kgl_start_int| variable will contain the starting number for
-% processing, while |\l_kgl_end_int| the ending number. The
-% |\g_kgl_pars_seq| sequence will contain the pseudokantian sentences
-% and |\g_kgl_words_seq| that contains the words to index.
+% The |\l_@@_start_int| variable will contain the starting number for
+% processing, while |\l_@@_end_int| the ending number. The
+% |\g_@@_pars_seq| sequence will contain the pseudokantian sentences
+% and |\g_@@_words_seq| that contains the words to index.
% \begin{macrocode}
-\int_new:N \l_kgl_start_int
-\int_new:N \l_kgl_end_int
-\seq_new:N \g_kgl_pars_seq
-\seq_new:N \g_kgl_words_seq
+\int_new:N \l_@@_start_int
+\int_new:N \l_@@_end_int
+\seq_new:N \g_@@_pars_seq
+\seq_new:N \g_@@_words_seq
% \end{macrocode}
%
% \subsection{User level commands}
@@ -245,10 +346,10 @@
{
\group_begin:
\IfBooleanTF{#1}
- { \cs_set_eq:NN \kgl_par: \kgl_star: }
- { \cs_set_eq:NN \kgl_par: \kgl_nostar: }
- \kgl_process:nn #2
- \kgl_print:
+ { \cs_set_eq:NN \@@_par: \@@_star: }
+ { \cs_set_eq:NN \@@_par: \@@_nostar: }
+ \@@_process:nn #2
+ \@@_print:
\group_end:
}
% \end{macrocode}
@@ -257,7 +358,7 @@
% \begin{function}{\kantdef}
% Sometimes one needs just a piece of text without implicit \cs{par}
% attached, so we provide \cs{kantdef}. In a group we neutralize the
-% meaning of |\kgl_number:n| and |\kgl_par:| and define the control
+% meaning of |\@@_number:n| and |\@@_par:| and define the control
% sequence given as first argument to the pseudokantian sentence being
% the $k$th element of the sequence containing them, where $k$ is the
% number given as second argument. If the control sequence is already
@@ -266,14 +367,14 @@
\NewDocumentCommand{\kantdef}{mm}
{
\group_begin:
- \cs_set_eq:NN \kgl_number:n \use_none:n
- \cs_set_eq:NN \kgl_par: \prg_do_nothing:
+ \cs_set_eq:NN \@@_number:n \use_none:n
+ \cs_set_eq:NN \@@_par: \prg_do_nothing:
\cs_if_exist:NTF #1
{
\msg_error:nnn {kantlipsum} {already-defined} {#1}
}
{
- \tl_set:Nx \l_tmpa_tl { \seq_item:Nn \g_kgl_pars_seq {#2} }
+ \tl_set:Nx \l_tmpa_tl { \seq_item:Nn \g_@@_pars_seq {#2} }
\cs_new:Npx #1 { \l_tmpa_tl }
}
\group_end:
@@ -282,71 +383,73 @@
% \end{function}
%
% \subsection{Internal functions}
-% \begin{function}{\kgl_process:nn}
-% The function |\kgl_process:nn| sets the temporary variables
-% |\l_kgl_start_int| and |\l_kgl_end_int|. If the optional argument to
+% \begin{function}{\@@_process:nn}
+% The function |\@@_process:nn| sets the temporary variables
+% |\l_@@_start_int| and |\l_@@_end_int|. If the optional argument to
% \cs{kant} is missing they are already set to 1 and 7 respectively;
% otherwise the argument has been split into its components; if the
% argument was |[|$m$|]| we set both variables to $m$, otherwise it
% was in the form |[|$m$|-|$n$|]| and we do the obvious action.
% \begin{macrocode}
-\cs_new_protected:Nn \kgl_process:nn
+\cs_new_protected:Nn \@@_process:nn
{
- \int_set:Nn \l_kgl_start_int {#1}
- \IfNoValueTF{#2}
- { \int_set:Nn \l_kgl_end_int {#1} }
- { \int_set:Nn \l_kgl_end_int {#2} }
+ \int_set:Nn \l_@@_start_int {#1}
+ \tl_if_novalue:nTF {#2}
+ { \int_set:Nn \l_@@_end_int {#1} }
+ { \int_set:Nn \l_@@_end_int {#2} }
}
% \end{macrocode}
-%\end{function}
+% \end{function}
+% \changes{v0.7}{2017/11/16}{Use \cs{tl_if_novalue:nTF} instead of \cs{IfNoValueTF}}
%
-% \begin{function}{\kgl_print:,\kgl_use:n}
-% The printing routine is in the function |\kgl_print:|; we start a
-% loop printing item number $x$ in the sequence |\g_kgl_pars_seq| for
-% all numbers $x$ in the specified range. The function |\kgl_use:n|
+% \begin{function}{\@@_print:,\@@_use:n}
+% The printing routine is in the function |\@@_print:|; we start a
+% loop printing item number $x$ in the sequence |\g_@@_pars_seq| for
+% all numbers $x$ in the specified range. The function |\@@_use:n|
% function is a wrapper to be used with |\int_step_function:nnnN|:
% it's passed a number as argument, builds the constant name
% corresponding to it and produces the text. If the index entry is to
-% be issued, the appropriate element from |\g_kgl_words_seq| is used;
+% be issued, the appropriate element from |\g_@@_words_seq| is used;
% the page reference might not be correct, though.
% \begin{macrocode}
-\cs_new_protected:Nn \kgl_print:
+\cs_new_protected:Nn \@@_print:
{
\int_step_function:nnnN
- {\l_kgl_start_int} {1} {\l_kgl_end_int} \kgl_use:n
+ {\l_@@_start_int} {1} {\l_@@_end_int} \@@_use:n
}
-\cs_new:Nn \kgl_use:n
- {
- \kgl_number:n {#1}
- \bool_if:NT \g_kgl_makeindex_bool
+\cs_new:Nn \@@_use:n
+ {
+ \int_compare:nNnF { #1 } > { \seq_count:N \g_@@_pars_seq }
+ { \@@_number:n {#1} }
+ \bool_if:NT \g_@@_makeindex_bool
{
- \use:x { \exp_not:N \index{ \seq_item:Nn \g_kgl_words_seq {#1} } }
+ \use:x { \exp_not:N \index{ \seq_item:Nn \g_@@_words_seq {#1} } }
}
- \seq_item:Nn \g_kgl_pars_seq {#1}
- }
+ \seq_item:Nn \g_@@_pars_seq {#1}
+ }
% \end{macrocode}
% \end{function}
%
-% \begin{function}{\kgl_newpara:n}
-% The |\kgl_newpara:n| appends a new item to the sequence |\g_kgl_pars_seq|
-% consisting of, say, \meta{text of the 42nd sentence}|\kgl_par:|
+% \begin{function}{\@@_newpara:n}
+% The |\@@_newpara:n| appends a new item to the sequence |\g_@@_pars_seq|
+% consisting of, say, \meta{text of the 42nd sentence}|\@@_par:|
% \begin{macrocode}
-\cs_new_protected:Nn \kgl_newpara:n
- { \seq_gput_right:Nn \g_kgl_pars_seq {#1\kgl_par:} }
+\cs_new_protected:Nn \@@_newpara:n
+ { \seq_gput_right:Nn \g_@@_pars_seq {#1\@@_par:} }
% \end{macrocode}
% \end{function}
%
-% \begin{function}{\kgl_newword:n}
-% The |\kgl_newword:n| appends a new item to the sequence |\g_kgl_words_seq|
+% \begin{function}{\@@_newword:n}
+% The |\@@_newword:n| appends a new item to the sequence |\g_@@_words_seq|
% consisting of one word from the corresponding paragraph.
% \begin{macrocode}
-\cs_new_protected:Nn \kgl_newword:n
- { \seq_gput_right:Nn \g_kgl_words_seq {#1} }
+\cs_new_protected:Nn \@@_newword:n
+ { \seq_gput_right:Nn \g_@@_words_seq {#1} }
% \end{macrocode}
% \end{function}
%
% \subsection{Defining the sentences}
-% We start a group where we set |\l_tmpa_int| to 0 and the category
+% We start a group where we set the category
% code of the space to 10 so as not to be forced to write |~| for
% spaces.
% \begin{macrocode}
@@ -355,9 +458,9 @@
% \end{macrocode}
%
% Then we provide all of the sentences with the pattern
-% |\kgl_newpara:n {|\meta{text}|}|
+% |\@@_newpara:n {|\meta{text}|}|
% \begin{macrocode}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, the Ideal of
+\@@_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, the Ideal of
practical reason is a representation of, as far as I know, the things
in themselves; as I have shown elsewhere, the phenomena should only be
used as a canon for our understanding. The paralogisms of practical
@@ -371,7 +474,7 @@
unity. There can be no doubt that the objects in space and time are
what first give rise to human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Let us suppose that the noumena have nothing to do
+\@@_newpara:n {Let us suppose that the noumena have nothing to do
with necessity, since knowledge of the Categories is a
posteriori. Hume tells us that the transcendental unity of
apperception can not take account of the discipline of natural reason,
@@ -385,7 +488,7 @@
necessary as our experience. By means of the Ideal, our sense
perceptions are by their very nature contradictory.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, the things
+\@@_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, the things
in themselves (and it remains a mystery why this is the case) are a
representation of time. Our concepts have lying before them the
paralogisms of natural reason, but our a posteriori concepts have
@@ -401,7 +504,7 @@
Ideal concerning the existence of the objects in space and time in
general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, what we have alone been able
+\@@_newpara:n {As we have already seen, what we have alone been able
to show is that the objects in space and time would be falsified; what
we have alone been able to show is that, our judgements are what first
give rise to metaphysics. As I have shown elsewhere, Aristotle tells
@@ -419,7 +522,7 @@
philosophy, but in a merely critical essay the simple mention of the
fact may suffice.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Therefore, we can deduce that the objects in space and
+\@@_newpara:n {Therefore, we can deduce that the objects in space and
time (and I assert, however, that this is the case) have lying before
them the objects in space and time. Because of our necessary ignorance
of the conditions, it must not be supposed that, then, formal logic
@@ -444,7 +547,7 @@
rise to the architectonic of pure reason, as is evident upon close
examination.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves are what first give rise to
+\@@_newpara:n {The things in themselves are what first give rise to
reason, as is proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural
reason, let us suppose that the transcendental unity of apperception
abstracts from all content of knowledge; in view of these
@@ -460,7 +563,7 @@
supposed that the objects in space and time are what first give rise
to the employment of pure reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, to avoid all
+\@@_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, to avoid all
misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that, on the contrary, the
never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions is a
representation of our inductive judgements, yet the things in
@@ -483,7 +586,7 @@
necessity. But the proof of this is a task from which we can here be
absolved.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Thus, the Antinomies exclude the possibility of, on
+\@@_newpara:n {Thus, the Antinomies exclude the possibility of, on
the other hand, natural causes, as will easily be shown in the next
section. Still, the reader should be careful to observe that the
phenomena have lying before them the intelligible objects in space and
@@ -503,7 +606,7 @@
The transcendental unity of apperception constitutes the whole content
for the noumena, by means of analytic unity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In all theoretical sciences, the paralogisms of human
+\@@_newpara:n {In all theoretical sciences, the paralogisms of human
reason would be falsified, as is proven in the ontological manuals.
The architectonic of human reason is what first gives rise to the
Categories. As any dedicated reader can clearly see, the paralogisms
@@ -513,7 +616,7 @@
be known a posteriori. Human reason occupies part of the sphere of
our experience concerning the existence of the phenomena in general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, our ampliative judgements
+\@@_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, our ampliative judgements
would thereby be made to contradict, in all theoretical sciences, the
pure employment of the discipline of human reason. Because of our
necessary ignorance of the conditions, Hume tells us that the
@@ -527,7 +630,7 @@
Ideal occupies part of the sphere of our knowledge concerning the
existence of the phenomena in general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, what we have alone been
+\@@_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, what we have alone been
able to show is that, in so far as this expounds the universal rules
of our a posteriori concepts, the architectonic of natural reason can
be treated like the architectonic of practical reason. Thus, our
@@ -541,7 +644,7 @@
space. By virtue of practical reason, the noumena, still, stand in
need to the pure employment of the things in themselves.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that the
+\@@_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that the
objects in space and time are the clue to the discovery of, certainly,
our a priori knowledge, by means of analytic unity. Our faculties
abstract from all content of knowledge; for these reasons, the
@@ -565,7 +668,7 @@
aesthetic, yet our faculties have lying before them the architectonic
of human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {However, we can deduce that our experience (and it
+\@@_newpara:n {However, we can deduce that our experience (and it
must not be supposed that this is true) stands in need of our
experience, as we have already seen. On the other hand, it is not at
all certain that necessity is a representation of, by means of the
@@ -579,7 +682,7 @@
respect of the intelligible character, exist in the objects in space
and time.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our ideas, in the case of the Ideal of pure reason,
+\@@_newpara:n {Our ideas, in the case of the Ideal of pure reason,
are by their very nature contradictory. The objects in space and time
can not take account of our understanding, and philosophy excludes the
possibility of, certainly, space. I assert that our ideas, by means
@@ -594,7 +697,7 @@
a complete system of transcendental philosophy, but in a merely
critical essay the simple mention of the fact may suffice.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of our faculties is a posteriori, pure
+\@@_newpara:n {Since knowledge of our faculties is a posteriori, pure
logic teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of, indeed,
the architectonic of human reason. As we have already seen, we can
deduce that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, the Ideal of
@@ -609,7 +712,7 @@
our judgements, as will easily be shown in the next section. This is
what chiefly concerns us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Time (and let us suppose that this is true) is the
+\@@_newpara:n {Time (and let us suppose that this is true) is the
clue to the discovery of the Categories, as we have already seen.
Since knowledge of our faculties is a priori, to avoid all
misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that the empirical objects
@@ -623,7 +726,7 @@
space and time can be treated like the paralogisms of natural reason.
This is what chiefly concerns us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between pure logic and natural
+\@@_newpara:n {Because of the relation between pure logic and natural
causes, to avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that,
even as this relates to the thing in itself, pure reason constitutes
the whole content for our concepts, but the Ideal of practical reason
@@ -641,7 +744,7 @@
the transcendental aesthetic only in so far as it is founded on
analytic principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {With the sole exception of our a priori knowledge, our
+\@@_newpara:n {With the sole exception of our a priori knowledge, our
faculties have nothing to do with our faculties. Pure reason (and we
can deduce that this is true) would thereby be made to contradict the
phenomena. As we have already seen, let us suppose that the
@@ -653,7 +756,7 @@
knowledge, by means of analytic unity. Philosophy has nothing to do
with natural causes.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By means of analysis, our faculties stand in need to,
+\@@_newpara:n {By means of analysis, our faculties stand in need to,
indeed, the empirical objects in space and time. The objects in space
and time, for these reasons, have nothing to do with our
understanding. There can be no doubt that the noumena can not take
@@ -663,7 +766,7 @@
space, yet our sense perceptions exist in the discipline of practical
reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Ideal can not take account of, so far as I know,
+\@@_newpara:n {The Ideal can not take account of, so far as I know,
our faculties. As we have already seen, the objects in space and time
are what first give rise to the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions; for these reasons, our a posteriori concepts
@@ -675,7 +778,7 @@
be made to contradict, indeed, our knowledge. Natural causes, so
regarded, exist in our judgements.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The never-ending regress in the series of empirical
+\@@_newpara:n {The never-ending regress in the series of empirical
conditions may not contradict itself, but it is still possible that it
may be in contradictions with, then, applied logic. The employment of
the noumena stands in need of space; with the sole exception of our
@@ -694,7 +797,7 @@
objects in space and time in general, as is proven in the ontological
manuals.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The transcendental unity of apperception, in the case
+\@@_newpara:n {The transcendental unity of apperception, in the case
of philosophy, is a body of demonstrated science, and some of it must
be known a posteriori. Thus, the objects in space and time, insomuch
as the discipline of practical reason relies on the Antinomies,
@@ -712,7 +815,7 @@
present remarks I am referring to time only in so far as it is founded
on disjunctive principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The discipline of pure reason is what first gives rise
+\@@_newpara:n {The discipline of pure reason is what first gives rise
to the Categories, but applied logic is the clue to the discovery of
our sense perceptions. The never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the
@@ -728,7 +831,7 @@
reasons, our sense perceptions stand in need to the manifold. Our
ideas are what first give rise to the paralogisms.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves have lying before them the
+\@@_newpara:n {The things in themselves have lying before them the
Antinomies, by virtue of human reason. By means of the transcendental
aesthetic, let us suppose that the discipline of natural reason
depends on natural causes, because of the relation between the
@@ -742,7 +845,7 @@
By means of analysis, the phenomena can not take account of natural
causes. This is not something we are in a position to establish.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since some of the things in themselves are a
+\@@_newpara:n {Since some of the things in themselves are a
posteriori, there can be no doubt that, when thus treated as our
understanding, pure reason depends on, still, the Ideal of natural
reason, and our speculative judgements constitute a body of
@@ -764,7 +867,7 @@
study of the Transcendental Deduction, would be falsified, but
metaphysics abstracts from all content of knowledge.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since some of natural causes are disjunctive, the
+\@@_newpara:n {Since some of natural causes are disjunctive, the
never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions is the key
to understanding, in particular, the noumena. By means of analysis,
the Categories (and it is not at all certain that this is the case)
@@ -786,7 +889,7 @@
ignorance of the conditions. But to this matter no answer is
possible.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since all of the objects in space and time are
+\@@_newpara:n {Since all of the objects in space and time are
synthetic, it remains a mystery why, even as this relates to our
experience, our a priori concepts should only be used as a canon for
our judgements, but the phenomena should only be used as a canon for
@@ -802,7 +905,7 @@
manuals. Certainly, it remains a mystery why the manifold is just as
necessary as the manifold, as is evident upon close examination.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In natural theology, what we have alone been able to
+\@@_newpara:n {In natural theology, what we have alone been able to
show is that the architectonic of practical reason is the clue to the
discovery of, still, the manifold, by means of analysis. Since
knowledge of the objects in space and time is a priori, the things in
@@ -821,7 +924,7 @@
thing in itself; however, the objects in space and time exist in
natural causes.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {I assert, however, that our a posteriori concepts (and
+\@@_newpara:n {I assert, however, that our a posteriori concepts (and
it is obvious that this is the case) would thereby be made to
contradict the discipline of practical reason; however, the things in
themselves, however, constitute the whole content of philosophy. As
@@ -848,7 +951,7 @@
ignorance of the conditions, I assert that, indeed, the architectonic
of natural reason, as I have elsewhere shown, would be falsified.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In natural theology, the transcendental unity of
+\@@_newpara:n {In natural theology, the transcendental unity of
apperception has nothing to do with the Antinomies. As will easily be
shown in the next section, our sense perceptions are by their very
nature contradictory, but our ideas, with the sole exception of human
@@ -860,7 +963,7 @@
space and time can not take account of the Transcendental Deduction,
but our knowledge, on the other hand, would be falsified.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, our understanding is the clue
+\@@_newpara:n {As we have already seen, our understanding is the clue
to the discovery of necessity. On the other hand, the Ideal of pure
reason is a body of demonstrated science, and all of it must be known
a posteriori, as is evident upon close examination. It is obvious
@@ -871,7 +974,7 @@
experience depends on the Ideal of natural reason, as we have already
seen.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {For these reasons, space is the key to understanding
+\@@_newpara:n {For these reasons, space is the key to understanding
the thing in itself. Our sense perceptions abstract from all content
of a priori knowledge, but the phenomena can never, as a whole,
furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like time, they are
@@ -884,7 +987,7 @@
Deduction; in natural theology, the noumena are the clue to the
discovery of, so far as I know, the Transcendental Deduction.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
+\@@_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
explain that, in respect of the intelligible character, the
transcendental aesthetic depends on the objects in space and time, yet
the manifold is the clue to the discovery of the Transcendental
@@ -901,7 +1004,7 @@
writings of Galileo, the transcendental unity of apperception stands
in need of, in the case of necessity, our speculative judgements.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The phenomena (and it is obvious that this is the
+\@@_newpara:n {The phenomena (and it is obvious that this is the
case) prove the validity of our sense perceptions; in natural
theology, philosophy teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the
content of the transcendental objects in space and time. In natural
@@ -916,7 +1019,7 @@
that, in accordance with the principles of the phenomena, the
Antinomies are a representation of metaphysics.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves can not take account of the
+\@@_newpara:n {The things in themselves can not take account of the
Transcendental Deduction. By means of analytic unity, it is obvious
that, that is to say, our sense perceptions, in all theoretical
sciences, can not take account of the thing in itself, yet the
@@ -928,7 +1031,7 @@
themselves are a representation of, in accordance with the principles
of philosophy, our sense perceptions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, philosophy is
+\@@_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, philosophy is
the mere result of the power of pure logic, a blind but indispensable
function of the soul; however, the phenomena can never, as a whole,
furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like general logic,
@@ -947,7 +1050,7 @@
abstracts from all content of a posteriori knowledge. The question of
this matter's relation to objects is not in any way under discussion.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By means of the transcendental aesthetic, it remains a
+\@@_newpara:n {By means of the transcendental aesthetic, it remains a
mystery why the phenomena (and it is not at all certain that this is
the case) are the clue to the discovery of the never-ending regress in
the series of empirical conditions. In all theoretical sciences,
@@ -964,7 +1067,7 @@
contradictory, by virtue of natural reason. This is the sense in
which it is to be understood in this work.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, let us suppose
+\@@_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, let us suppose
that, in accordance with the principles of time, our a priori concepts
are the clue to the discovery of philosophy. By means of analysis, to
avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that, in
@@ -983,7 +1086,7 @@
the validity of philosophy, yet pure reason is the key to
understanding the Categories. This is what chiefly concerns us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Natural causes, when thus treated as the things in
+\@@_newpara:n {Natural causes, when thus treated as the things in
themselves, abstract from all content of a posteriori knowledge, by
means of analytic unity. Our a posteriori knowledge, in other words,
is the key to understanding the Antinomies. As we have already seen,
@@ -1005,7 +1108,7 @@
on the paralogisms, the Transcendental Deduction, by means of
analysis.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, the Ideal constitutes the
+\@@_newpara:n {As we have already seen, the Ideal constitutes the
whole content for the transcendental unity of apperception. By means
of analytic unity, let us suppose that, when thus treated as space,
our synthetic judgements, therefore, would be falsified, and the
@@ -1025,7 +1128,7 @@
the employment of the Antinomies. Let us apply this to our
experience.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {I assert, thus, that the discipline of natural reason
+\@@_newpara:n {I assert, thus, that the discipline of natural reason
can be treated like the transcendental aesthetic, since some of the
Categories are speculative. In the case of transcendental logic, our
ideas prove the validity of our understanding, as any dedicated reader
@@ -1041,7 +1144,7 @@
blind but indispensable function of the soul, as is proven in the
ontological manuals.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The noumena have nothing to do with, thus, the
+\@@_newpara:n {The noumena have nothing to do with, thus, the
Antinomies. What we have alone been able to show is that the things
in themselves constitute the whole content of human reason, as is
proven in the ontological manuals. The noumena (and to avoid all
@@ -1057,7 +1160,7 @@
space and time are what first give rise to, in all theoretical
sciences, our a posteriori concepts.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our understanding excludes the possibility of
+\@@_newpara:n {Our understanding excludes the possibility of
practical reason. Our faculties stand in need to, consequently, the
never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions; still, the
employment of necessity is what first gives rise to general logic.
@@ -1073,7 +1176,7 @@
empirical objects in space and time prove the validity of natural
causes.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between space and the noumena,
+\@@_newpara:n {Because of the relation between space and the noumena,
our experience is by its very nature contradictory. It is obvious
that natural causes constitute the whole content of the transcendental
unity of apperception, as any dedicated reader can clearly see. By
@@ -1093,7 +1196,7 @@
I am referring to the pure employment of our disjunctive judgements
only in so far as it is founded on inductive principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that our sense
+\@@_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that our sense
perceptions are the clue to the discovery of our understanding; in
natural theology, necessity, in all theoretical sciences, occupies
part of the sphere of the transcendental unity of apperception
@@ -1108,7 +1211,7 @@
mystery why this is the case) are just as necessary as the Ideal of
human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, our
+\@@_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, our
experience is the clue to the discovery of philosophy; in the study of
space, the Categories are what first give rise to the transcendental
aesthetic. As any dedicated reader can clearly see, the reader should
@@ -1125,7 +1228,7 @@
case) stand in need to the discipline of practical reason; thus, our
knowledge, indeed, can not take account of our ideas.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In the study of time, our concepts prove the validity
+\@@_newpara:n {In the study of time, our concepts prove the validity
of, as I have elsewhere shown, our understanding, as any dedicated
reader can clearly see. As will easily be shown in the next section,
the reader should be careful to observe that, so far as regards our
@@ -1146,7 +1249,7 @@
ideas. It remains a mystery why, then, the architectonic of practical
reason proves the validity of, therefore, the noumena.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The paralogisms of practical reason can be treated
+\@@_newpara:n {The paralogisms of practical reason can be treated
like the paralogisms. The objects in space and time, therefore, are
what first give rise to the discipline of human reason; in all
theoretical sciences, the things in themselves (and we can deduce that
@@ -1164,7 +1267,7 @@
Ideal of pure reason relies on the intelligible objects in space and
time, are by their very nature contradictory.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Time, on the contrary, can never furnish a true and
+\@@_newpara:n {Time, on the contrary, can never furnish a true and
demonstrated science, because, like the transcendental aesthetic, it
constitutes the whole content for ampliative principles, yet natural
reason, even as this relates to philosophy, proves the validity of the
@@ -1183,7 +1286,7 @@
Consequently, the Ideal of pure reason can be treated like the
phenomena. Let us apply this to the Transcendental Deduction.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that our a
+\@@_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that our a
posteriori concepts (and it is obvious that this is the case) are what
first give rise to the transcendental unity of apperception. In the
case of necessity, the reader should be careful to observe that
@@ -1200,7 +1303,7 @@
consequently, the architectonic of pure reason, in all theoretical
sciences, would be falsified.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Transcendental Deduction stands in need of the
+\@@_newpara:n {The Transcendental Deduction stands in need of the
Ideal of pure reason, and the noumena, for these reasons, are by their
very nature contradictory. The objects in space and time have lying
before them our ideas. The transcendental unity of apperception,
@@ -1215,7 +1318,7 @@
and the discipline of pure reason abstracts from all content of a
priori knowledge. We thus have a pure synthesis of apprehension.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions,
+\@@_newpara:n {Because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions,
what we have alone been able to show is that formal logic can not take
account of the Categories; in the study of the transcendental
aesthetic, philosophy can thereby determine in its totality the
@@ -1233,7 +1336,7 @@
reader can clearly see. This is the sense in which it is to be
understood in this work.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that, in respect of the
+\@@_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that, in respect of the
intelligible character, the Antinomies (and we can deduce that this is
the case) constitute the whole content of the phenomena, yet the
Categories exist in natural causes. The Ideal of natural reason, when
@@ -1249,7 +1352,7 @@
perceptions (and there can be no doubt that this is the case) are what
first give rise to the discipline of practical reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Thus, the reader should be careful to observe that the
+\@@_newpara:n {Thus, the reader should be careful to observe that the
noumena would thereby be made to contradict necessity, because of our
necessary ignorance of the conditions. Consequently, our sense
perceptions are just as necessary as the architectonic of natural
@@ -1267,7 +1370,7 @@
not take account of, for these reasons, the transcendental unity of
apperception.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that, for
+\@@_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that, for
example, pure logic depends on the transcendental unity of
apperception. As any dedicated reader can clearly see, our a priori
concepts are what first give rise to the Categories. Hume tells us
@@ -1284,7 +1387,7 @@
will easily be shown in the next section. We thus have a pure
synthesis of apprehension.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Antinomies have nothing to do with our faculties.
+\@@_newpara:n {The Antinomies have nothing to do with our faculties.
As is shown in the writings of Hume, we can deduce that, on the
contrary, the empirical objects in space and time prove the validity
of our ideas. The manifold may not contradict itself, but it is still
@@ -1303,7 +1406,7 @@
have elsewhere shown, philosophy proves the validity of our sense
perceptions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
+\@@_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
phenomena, so far as I know, exist in the noumena; however, our
concepts, however, exclude the possibility of our judgements. Galileo
tells us that our a posteriori knowledge would thereby be made to
@@ -1325,7 +1428,7 @@
some ground in the nature of the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
+\@@_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
explain that time excludes the possibility of the discipline of human
reason; in the study of practical reason, the manifold has nothing to
do with time. Because of the relation between our a priori knowledge
@@ -1340,7 +1443,7 @@
to the paralogisms of pure reason. As is shown in the writings of
Hume, space has nothing to do with, for example, necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {We can deduce that the Ideal of practical reason, even
+\@@_newpara:n {We can deduce that the Ideal of practical reason, even
as this relates to our knowledge, is a representation of the
discipline of human reason. The things in themselves are just as
necessary as our understanding. The noumena prove the validity of the
@@ -1352,7 +1455,7 @@
blind but indispensable function of the soul. The divisions are thus
provided; all that is required is to fill them.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The never-ending regress in the series of empirical
+\@@_newpara:n {The never-ending regress in the series of empirical
conditions can be treated like the objects in space and time. What we
have alone been able to show is that, then, the transcendental
aesthetic, in reference to ends, would thereby be made to contradict
@@ -1365,7 +1468,7 @@
explain that the things in themselves are a representation of, in
other words, necessity, as is evident upon close examination.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, it remains a
+\@@_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, it remains a
mystery why our experience is the mere result of the power of the
discipline of human reason, a blind but indispensable function of the
soul. For these reasons, the employment of the thing in itself
@@ -1386,7 +1489,7 @@
however, our faculties. But at present we shall turn our attention to
the thing in itself.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, we can deduce
+\@@_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, we can deduce
that the transcendental unity of apperception depends on the Ideal of
practical reason. Certainly, it is obvious that the Antinomies, in
accordance with the principles of the objects in space and time,
@@ -1412,7 +1515,7 @@
itself, but the paralogisms prove the validity of transcendental
logic.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {We can deduce that, then, the noumena are just as
+\@@_newpara:n {We can deduce that, then, the noumena are just as
necessary as, so regarded, the practical employment of the objects in
space and time. It is obvious that the manifold has nothing to do
with our ideas; with the sole exception of the employment of the
@@ -1433,7 +1536,7 @@
that our ideas exclude the possibility of, irrespective of all
empirical conditions, our ideas. Let us apply this to space.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It remains a mystery why our sense perceptions prove
+\@@_newpara:n {It remains a mystery why our sense perceptions prove
the validity of our a priori concepts. The objects in space and time,
then, exist in metaphysics; therefore, the things in themselves can
not take account of the transcendental aesthetic. The Ideal of pure
@@ -1444,7 +1547,7 @@
themselves constitute a body of demonstrated doctrine, and some of
this body must be known a posteriori.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As will easily be shown in the next section, the
+\@@_newpara:n {As will easily be shown in the next section, the
Transcendental Deduction exists in the Ideal. To avoid all
misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that pure reason (and it
is obvious that this is true) is the key to understanding the
@@ -1465,7 +1568,7 @@
faculties are just as necessary as the Categories, yet the manifold
has lying before it, certainly, our understanding.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It is obvious that the never-ending regress in the
+\@@_newpara:n {It is obvious that the never-ending regress in the
series of empirical conditions may not contradict itself, but it is
still possible that it may be in contradictions with the architectonic
of practical reason. The objects in space and time, so regarded,
@@ -1479,7 +1582,7 @@
just as necessary as the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Thus, transcendental logic (and I assert, for these
+\@@_newpara:n {Thus, transcendental logic (and I assert, for these
reasons, that this is true) depends on the Antinomies. Still, general
logic (and it remains a mystery why this is true) is what first gives
rise to the objects in space and time, because of the relation between
@@ -1498,7 +1601,7 @@
However, the objects in space and time are what first give rise to our
understanding, because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {On the other hand, the Antinomies have nothing to do
+\@@_newpara:n {On the other hand, the Antinomies have nothing to do
with pure reason, because of our necessary ignorance of the
conditions. Our speculative judgements are what first give rise to
the Categories. Time is the key to understanding natural causes, as
@@ -1511,7 +1614,7 @@
theology, the discipline of natural reason, on the other hand, would
be falsified, as any dedicated reader can clearly see.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In the case of the discipline of human reason, it is
+\@@_newpara:n {In the case of the discipline of human reason, it is
obvious that the phenomena, still, are the mere results of the power
of the practical employment of the Transcendental Deduction, a blind
but indispensable function of the soul, by means of analysis. As any
@@ -1535,7 +1638,7 @@
reason. Hume tells us that our ideas abstract from all content of a
posteriori knowledge, as is evident upon close examination.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The manifold is a representation of the phenomena.
+\@@_newpara:n {The manifold is a representation of the phenomena.
Our judgements constitute the whole content of, on the other hand, the
things in themselves, as will easily be shown in the next section. By
means of analytic unity, the phenomena, in the full sense of these
@@ -1545,7 +1648,7 @@
to understanding time. In the study of formal logic, the paralogisms
of pure reason are the clue to the discovery of, thus, the manifold.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that the never-ending regress in
+\@@_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that the never-ending regress in
the series of empirical conditions may not contradict itself, but it
is still possible that it may be in contradictions with, indeed, our
sense perceptions. As is proven in the ontological manuals, the
@@ -1566,7 +1669,7 @@
function of the soul. The divisions are thus provided; all that is
required is to fill them.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, the Antinomies are a
+\@@_newpara:n {As we have already seen, the Antinomies are a
representation of the Categories. Necessity stands in need of the
Antinomies. By virtue of natural reason, the Antinomies have lying
before them the Ideal of pure reason; on the other hand, the
@@ -1584,7 +1687,7 @@
of the necessary interconnection that we have in mind when we speak of
necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, the paralogisms
+\@@_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, the paralogisms
abstract from all content of a posteriori knowledge. Consequently,
the transcendental aesthetic, in reference to ends, occupies part of
the sphere of metaphysics concerning the existence of the Categories
@@ -1603,7 +1706,7 @@
manifold, irrespective of all empirical conditions, is what first
gives rise to space.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, our experience
+\@@_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, our experience
occupies part of the sphere of the Ideal concerning the existence of
the objects in space and time in general, as will easily be shown in
the next section. It must not be supposed that our ideas (and it
@@ -1621,7 +1724,7 @@
because, like the architectonic of pure reason, it is just as
necessary as a priori principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
+\@@_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
explain that philosophy can not take account of our sense perceptions;
in the study of the discipline of natural reason, our experience, in
the study of the architectonic of practical reason, is the mere result
@@ -1637,7 +1740,7 @@
can be no doubt that this is true) depends on our understanding, but
the Ideal can thereby determine in its totality metaphysics.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of the objects in space and time is a
+\@@_newpara:n {Since knowledge of the objects in space and time is a
posteriori, general logic, in respect of the intelligible character,
is by its very nature contradictory. By means of analytic unity, it
is not at all certain that space, insomuch as our understanding relies
@@ -1655,7 +1758,7 @@
part of the sphere of our understanding concerning the existence of
the phenomena in general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Human reason (and we can deduce that this is true)
+\@@_newpara:n {Human reason (and we can deduce that this is true)
proves the validity of the architectonic of natural reason. To avoid
all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that the employment of
the things in themselves can not take account of the phenomena. The
@@ -1670,7 +1773,7 @@
ideas is a posteriori, the phenomena are a representation of the
phenomena.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Necessity, as I have elsewhere shown, is the mere
+\@@_newpara:n {Necessity, as I have elsewhere shown, is the mere
result of the power of the architectonic of practical reason, a blind
but indispensable function of the soul. The paralogisms of pure
reason are the clue to the discovery of the practical employment of
@@ -1685,7 +1788,7 @@
general logic, yet the objects in space and time are just as necessary
as the noumena. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, let us suppose that
+\@@_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, let us suppose that
the Categories exclude the possibility of the never-ending regress in
the series of empirical conditions. The manifold occupies part of the
sphere of the thing in itself concerning the existence of the things
@@ -1702,7 +1805,7 @@
Philosophy is the key to understanding, thus, our sense perceptions.
This is what chiefly concerns us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our understanding would thereby be made to contradict,
+\@@_newpara:n {Our understanding would thereby be made to contradict,
so far as regards the Ideal, necessity. Our faculties, as I have
elsewhere shown, are the mere results of the power of time, a blind
but indispensable function of the soul. Time, with the sole exception
@@ -1719,7 +1822,7 @@
discovery of, in the study of the thing in itself, the discipline of
practical reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our a priori concepts, with the sole exception of our
+\@@_newpara:n {Our a priori concepts, with the sole exception of our
experience, have lying before them our judgements. It must not be
supposed that the Antinomies are a representation of the discipline of
human reason, by means of analytic unity. In the study of the
@@ -1746,7 +1849,7 @@
transcendental unity of apperception, they exclude the possibility of
hypothetical principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since none of our faculties are speculative, our ideas
+\@@_newpara:n {Since none of our faculties are speculative, our ideas
should only be used as a canon for time. With the sole exception of
the manifold, our concepts exclude the possibility of the practical
employment of metaphysics, by means of analysis. Aristotle tells us
@@ -1765,7 +1868,7 @@
that, in other words, the manifold, that is to say, abstracts from all
content of knowledge.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, Aristotle
+\@@_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, Aristotle
tells us that the transcendental unity of apperception can be treated
like the discipline of pure reason; in the case of our understanding,
our sense perceptions are just as necessary as the noumena. The
@@ -1781,7 +1884,7 @@
like the transcendental aesthetic, it has nothing to do with
ampliative principles. Transcendental logic exists in our faculties.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that the objects in space and
+\@@_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that the objects in space and
time have nothing to do with our judgements. The architectonic of
human reason has nothing to do with the noumena. What we have alone
been able to show is that natural causes have nothing to do with,
@@ -1799,7 +1902,7 @@
remains a mystery why this is true) is the clue to the discovery of
our speculative judgements.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As I have elsewhere shown, the Ideal is a body of
+\@@_newpara:n {As I have elsewhere shown, the Ideal is a body of
demonstrated science, and some of it must be known a priori, as is
evident upon close examination. Our ideas abstract from all content
of knowledge, and the phenomena have nothing to do with, then,
@@ -1817,7 +1920,7 @@
practical reason, then, is what first gives rise to necessity; still,
our concepts stand in need to the objects in space and time.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that our sense perceptions are
+\@@_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that our sense perceptions are
the clue to the discovery of the Antinomies. As will easily be shown
in the next section, our experience, in particular, excludes the
possibility of natural causes, yet the architectonic of human reason
@@ -1836,7 +1939,7 @@
necessary interconnection that we have in mind when we speak of the
transcendental aesthetic. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, Aristotle tells us that, when
+\@@_newpara:n {As we have already seen, Aristotle tells us that, when
thus treated as the phenomena, the transcendental unity of
apperception can thereby determine in its totality the Ideal of human
reason. There can be no doubt that natural causes can not take
@@ -1854,7 +1957,7 @@
alone been able to show is that this is true) is the clue to the
discovery of the objects in space and time.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In the case of the Transcendental Deduction, our ideas
+\@@_newpara:n {In the case of the Transcendental Deduction, our ideas
would thereby be made to contradict, in natural theology, the objects
in space and time. In all theoretical sciences, it remains a mystery
why the employment of our understanding has nothing to do with the
@@ -1872,7 +1975,7 @@
of the Transcendental Deduction concerning the existence of the
intelligible objects in space and time in general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Still, time is by its very nature contradictory. The
+\@@_newpara:n {Still, time is by its very nature contradictory. The
paralogisms of practical reason constitute a body of demonstrated
doctrine, and none of this body must be known a priori; for these
reasons, the noumena are the mere results of the power of the
@@ -1887,7 +1990,7 @@
objects in space and time is a priori. The Categories are what first
give rise to the Transcendental Deduction.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our faculties, in the full sense of these terms, exist
+\@@_newpara:n {Our faculties, in the full sense of these terms, exist
in the noumena, because of the relation between space and the
phenomena. Because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions, the
paralogisms of practical reason are a representation of, indeed, our
@@ -1907,7 +2010,7 @@
knowledge, formal logic would thereby be made to contradict the
noumena.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since all of our a posteriori concepts are synthetic,
+\@@_newpara:n {Since all of our a posteriori concepts are synthetic,
applied logic has nothing to do with, for example, the noumena. With
the sole exception of philosophy, the Ideal of practical reason is
what first gives rise to our ideas, as is evident upon close
@@ -1929,7 +2032,7 @@
empirical objects in space and time, with the sole exception of
metaphysics, exist in the empirical objects in space and time. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {On the other hand, the reader should be careful to
+\@@_newpara:n {On the other hand, the reader should be careful to
observe that the Transcendental Deduction can never furnish a true and
demonstrated science, because, like our experience, it would thereby
be made to contradict synthetic principles. The pure employment of
@@ -1949,7 +2052,7 @@
system of transcendental philosophy, but in a merely critical essay
the simple mention of the fact may suffice.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our sense perceptions are just as necessary as the
+\@@_newpara:n {Our sense perceptions are just as necessary as the
employment of the never-ending regress in the series of empirical
conditions, but our a priori concepts can never, as a whole, furnish a
true and demonstrated science, because, like necessity, they would
@@ -1967,7 +2070,7 @@
abstracts from all content of a priori knowledge. The paralogisms of
pure reason should only be used as a canon for time.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, I assert that the
+\@@_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, I assert that the
paralogisms, for example, would be falsified; however, our inductive
judgements constitute the whole content of the discipline of natural
reason. The noumena constitute the whole content of the noumena. The
@@ -1988,7 +2091,7 @@
from all content of knowledge; on the other hand, our faculties should
only be used as a canon for the pure employment of the Categories.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Aristotle tells us that our ideas have lying before
+\@@_newpara:n {Aristotle tells us that our ideas have lying before
them the phenomena. In the study of the employment of the objects in
space and time, it is not at all certain that the transcendental
aesthetic teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of, so
@@ -2007,7 +2110,7 @@
careful to observe that, indeed, the transcendental aesthetic, still,
exists in natural causes.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since none of the objects in space and time are
+\@@_newpara:n {Since none of the objects in space and time are
analytic, it remains a mystery why, in the full sense of these terms,
the objects in space and time have lying before them the Categories,
and our ideas (and let us suppose that this is the case) have lying
@@ -2026,7 +2129,7 @@
be no doubt that the manifold, when thus treated as the things in
themselves, is by its very nature contradictory.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As I have elsewhere shown, the never-ending regress in
+\@@_newpara:n {As I have elsewhere shown, the never-ending regress in
the series of empirical conditions, in the study of the never-ending
regress in the series of empirical conditions, occupies part of the
sphere of the Transcendental Deduction concerning the existence of the
@@ -2043,7 +2146,7 @@
treated as the objects in space and time, constitutes the whole
content for the Ideal.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It is not at all certain that, so far as regards the
+\@@_newpara:n {It is not at all certain that, so far as regards the
manifold and our ideas, the Categories are just as necessary as, in
the study of the architectonic of pure reason, the discipline of human
reason. It must not be supposed that metaphysics is the mere result
@@ -2056,7 +2159,7 @@
show is that our judgements constitute the whole content of, on the
other hand, our inductive judgements, as we have already seen. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {The objects in space and time should only be used as a
+\@@_newpara:n {The objects in space and time should only be used as a
canon for the phenomena. By means of analysis, to avoid all
misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that the noumena are just
as necessary as pure logic; however, natural causes exist in the Ideal
@@ -2075,7 +2178,7 @@
philosophy, it has lying before it speculative principles. This is
the sense in which it is to be understood in this work.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Still, the Ideal is what first gives rise to, when
+\@@_newpara:n {Still, the Ideal is what first gives rise to, when
thus treated as our ideas, the transcendental aesthetic. As any
dedicated reader can clearly see, it is obvious that natural causes
exclude the possibility of natural causes; therefore, metaphysics is a
@@ -2099,7 +2202,7 @@
manifold, time is the key to understanding space. By virtue of human
reason, our speculative judgements have nothing to do with the Ideal.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Transcendental logic constitutes the whole content
+\@@_newpara:n {Transcendental logic constitutes the whole content
for, for example, the never-ending regress in the series of empirical
conditions. It remains a mystery why, even as this relates to time,
the Ideal excludes the possibility of the Categories, but natural
@@ -2118,7 +2221,7 @@
like necessity; for these reasons, the noumena exclude the possibility
of the Ideal.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that our a
+\@@_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that our a
posteriori knowledge has lying before it the Categories, as is shown
in the writings of Galileo. Thus, the Categories are the mere results
of the power of space, a blind but indispensable function of the soul.
@@ -2137,7 +2240,7 @@
the validity of the things in themselves, and our sense perceptions
would thereby be made to contradict our understanding.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, Galileo tells
+\@@_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, Galileo tells
us that natural causes, so far as regards necessity, can never, as a
whole, furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the
manifold, they prove the validity of ampliative principles. Let us
@@ -2156,7 +2259,7 @@
natural reason, there can be no doubt that our understanding would be
falsified. This is what chiefly concerns us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between philosophy and the
+\@@_newpara:n {Because of the relation between philosophy and the
objects in space and time, the Categories, in all theoretical
sciences, are by their very nature contradictory. What we have alone
been able to show is that our knowledge is a representation of the
@@ -2175,7 +2278,7 @@
considerations, is by its very nature contradictory. Let us apply
this to necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, our sense
+\@@_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, our sense
perceptions, as I have elsewhere shown, should only be used as a canon
for our ideas; in natural theology, the paralogisms, indeed, are by
their very nature contradictory. By virtue of practical reason, the
@@ -2193,7 +2296,7 @@
still, time, with the sole exception of our experience, can be treated
like our sense perceptions. This is what chiefly concerns us. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Categories, as I have elsewhere shown, constitute
+\@@_newpara:n {The Categories, as I have elsewhere shown, constitute
the whole content of necessity. The transcendental unity of
apperception is just as necessary as the transcendental objects in
space and time. Consequently, I assert that the thing in itself is a
@@ -2208,7 +2311,7 @@
possible that it may be in contradictions with the architectonic of
human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of the objects in space and time is a
+\@@_newpara:n {Since knowledge of the objects in space and time is a
priori, it remains a mystery why, in reference to ends, the phenomena
prove the validity of the paralogisms. As is proven in the
ontological manuals, the empirical objects in space and time would
@@ -2234,7 +2337,7 @@
possibility of our ideas; thus, the objects in space and time, for
these reasons, are the clue to the discovery of the Antinomies.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {With the sole exception of the never-ending regress in
+\@@_newpara:n {With the sole exception of the never-ending regress in
the series of empirical conditions, it is not at all certain that the
noumena, in so far as this expounds the practical rules of the
paralogisms of pure reason, can never, as a whole, furnish a true and
@@ -2253,7 +2356,7 @@
all content of knowledge; in the study of the Ideal of practical
reason, our concepts are the clue to the discovery of our experience.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
+\@@_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
Categories would be falsified. Consequently, there can be no doubt
that the noumena can not take account of, even as this relates to
philosophy, the Antinomies, as any dedicated reader can clearly see.
@@ -2272,7 +2375,7 @@
before them our faculties, and the architectonic of natural reason
stands in need of the things in themselves.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By means of analytic unity, the objects in space and
+\@@_newpara:n {By means of analytic unity, the objects in space and
time (and there can be no doubt that this is the case) constitute the
whole content of the Antinomies, but our ideas have lying before them
the noumena. The Ideal is the key to understanding, that is to say,
@@ -2289,7 +2392,7 @@
time have nothing to do with philosophy. The divisions are thus
provided; all that is required is to fill them.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, the noumena would
+\@@_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, the noumena would
thereby be made to contradict, in view of these considerations, the
paralogisms of natural reason. Because of the relation between the
discipline of pure reason and our sense perceptions, we can deduce
@@ -2306,7 +2409,7 @@
irrespective of all empirical conditions, is by its very nature
contradictory. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that natural
+\@@_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that natural
causes (and to avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain
that this is the case) have lying before them necessity. We can
deduce that our a priori knowledge (and Galileo tells us that this is
@@ -2326,7 +2429,7 @@
is obvious that this is the case) are the clue to the discovery of the
paralogisms.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, it is not at
+\@@_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, it is not at
all certain that, on the contrary, the objects in space and time, in
the case of space, stand in need to the objects in space and time, but
the phenomena have lying before them the discipline of human reason.
@@ -2350,7 +2453,7 @@
Transcendental Deduction, a blind but indispensable function of the
soul. But this need not worry us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Aristotle tells us that, insomuch as the pure
+\@@_newpara:n {Aristotle tells us that, insomuch as the pure
employment of the Categories relies on our ideas, the things in
themselves are just as necessary as, in all theoretical sciences, the
noumena. Therefore, let us suppose that the phenomena occupy part of
@@ -2375,7 +2478,7 @@
still, the employment of the noumena is a representation of the
Ideal.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {We can deduce that the paralogisms of human reason are
+\@@_newpara:n {We can deduce that the paralogisms of human reason are
a representation of, in the full sense of these terms, our experience.
The thing in itself, in reference to ends, exists in our judgements.
As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, let us suppose that, in
@@ -2392,7 +2495,7 @@
content of knowledge, since knowledge of the objects in space and time
is a posteriori.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between practical reason and
+\@@_newpara:n {Because of the relation between practical reason and
our problematic judgements, what we have alone been able to show is
that, in respect of the intelligible character, our faculties,
insomuch as our knowledge relies on the Categories, can be treated
@@ -2412,7 +2515,7 @@
fallen short of the necessary interconnection that we have in mind
when we speak of necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It is not at all certain that space can not take
+\@@_newpara:n {It is not at all certain that space can not take
account of natural causes. The Transcendental Deduction can not take
account of our a priori knowledge; as I have elsewhere shown, the
objects in space and time (and let us suppose that this is the case)
@@ -2427,7 +2530,7 @@
reason, thus, abstract from all content of knowledge. This is not
something we are in a position to establish.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since none of our ideas are inductive, our ideas
+\@@_newpara:n {Since none of our ideas are inductive, our ideas
constitute the whole content of the paralogisms; consequently, our
faculties can not take account of metaphysics. As will easily be
shown in the next section, the Ideal, in reference to ends, may not
@@ -2451,7 +2554,7 @@
soul, yet the objects in space and time, with the sole exception of
the manifold, exist in our ideas.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In natural theology, it must not be supposed that the
+\@@_newpara:n {In natural theology, it must not be supposed that the
objects in space and time, so far as regards the manifold, should only
be used as a canon for natural reason. The manifold, so far as
regards our a priori knowledge, teaches us nothing whatsoever
@@ -2470,7 +2573,7 @@
body of demonstrated doctrine, and some of this body must be known a
posteriori. And similarly with all the others.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our speculative judgements, therefore, prove the
+\@@_newpara:n {Our speculative judgements, therefore, prove the
validity of the transcendental unity of apperception. Necessity is
just as necessary as, that is to say, transcendental logic. The
reader should be careful to observe that the noumena (and it must not
@@ -2484,7 +2587,7 @@
the paralogisms prove the validity of, as I have elsewhere shown, the
architectonic of pure reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Space may not contradict itself, but it is still
+\@@_newpara:n {Space may not contradict itself, but it is still
possible that it may be in contradictions with, for these reasons, the
phenomena; with the sole exception of metaphysics, our ideas exclude
the possibility of, in natural theology, the thing in itself. What we
@@ -2509,7 +2612,7 @@
short of the necessary interconnection that we have in mind when we
speak of necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The objects in space and time are the mere results of
+\@@_newpara:n {The objects in space and time are the mere results of
the power of metaphysics, a blind but indispensable function of the
soul; in the study of our a posteriori knowledge, the manifold, so far
as I know, proves the validity of the Ideal. Hume tells us that, so
@@ -2529,7 +2632,7 @@
conditions. But we have fallen short of the necessary interconnection
that we have in mind when we speak of the Categories.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions,
+\@@_newpara:n {Because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions,
it is not at all certain that, for example, the thing in itself (and
the reader should be careful to observe that this is true) can not
take account of our experience, and our concepts, in all theoretical
@@ -2541,7 +2644,7 @@
understanding can be treated like the transcendental unity of
apperception. The Categories can be treated like space.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since some of our sense perceptions are hypothetical,
+\@@_newpara:n {Since some of our sense perceptions are hypothetical,
philosophy proves the validity of natural causes; on the other hand,
our experience, in other words, can never furnish a true and
demonstrated science, because, like our experience, it depends on
@@ -2559,7 +2662,7 @@
view of these considerations, are by their very nature contradictory,
as will easily be shown in the next section.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {On the other hand, the never-ending regress in the
+\@@_newpara:n {On the other hand, the never-ending regress in the
series of empirical conditions stands in need of practical reason. As
will easily be shown in the next section, there can be no doubt that,
in so far as this expounds the contradictory rules of the discipline
@@ -2573,7 +2676,7 @@
show is that natural causes, in reference to ends, would be falsified.
But this need not worry us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since some of the objects in space and time are
+\@@_newpara:n {Since some of the objects in space and time are
speculative, let us suppose that our sense perceptions are the clue to
the discovery of, in particular, our a posteriori knowledge. Since
knowledge of the transcendental objects in space and time is a
@@ -2595,7 +2698,7 @@
space and time, and space is the clue to the discovery of, in
particular, our a posteriori concepts. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Ideal of human reason has nothing to do with time.
+\@@_newpara:n {The Ideal of human reason has nothing to do with time.
As we have already seen, Aristotle tells us that, so far as regards
the Transcendental Deduction, the transcendental aesthetic, insomuch
as the practical employment of the never-ending regress in the series
@@ -2614,7 +2717,7 @@
teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of, consequently,
the Antinomies, because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since all of our concepts are inductive, there can be
+\@@_newpara:n {Since all of our concepts are inductive, there can be
no doubt that, in respect of the intelligible character, our ideas are
the clue to the discovery of the transcendental unity of apperception,
and the paralogisms of natural reason should only be used as a canon
@@ -2633,7 +2736,7 @@
posteriori concepts is what first gives rise to, in all theoretical
sciences, the noumena.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of natural causes is a posteriori, it
+\@@_newpara:n {Since knowledge of natural causes is a posteriori, it
is obvious that the transcendental unity of apperception is the mere
result of the power of the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions, a blind but indispensable function of the soul;
@@ -2650,7 +2753,7 @@
in itself, occupy part of the sphere of the Transcendental Deduction
concerning the existence of the Categories in general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, it is not at all certain
+\@@_newpara:n {As we have already seen, it is not at all certain
that, that is to say, the Transcendental Deduction is the clue to the
discovery of, in particular, our knowledge, yet the thing in itself
would thereby be made to contradict our faculties. As is proven in
@@ -2669,7 +2772,7 @@
Categories, certainly, should only be used as a canon for the thing in
itself. This is not something we are in a position to establish.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It is obvious that space depends on the things in
+\@@_newpara:n {It is obvious that space depends on the things in
themselves. There can be no doubt that, in particular, the Ideal, in
so far as this expounds the practical rules of the phenomena, is just
as necessary as the transcendental unity of apperception. There can
@@ -2680,7 +2783,7 @@
understanding (and to avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
explain that this is true) is a representation of the Antinomies.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, the Antinomies are a
+\@@_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, the Antinomies are a
representation of metaphysics; in the case of the practical employment
of the transcendental aesthetic, the Categories are by their very
nature contradictory. It is not at all certain that the phenomena
@@ -2698,7 +2801,7 @@
that metaphysics is a representation of the transcendental unity of
apperception, as any dedicated reader can clearly see.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that our concepts, in accordance
+\@@_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that our concepts, in accordance
with the principles of the noumena, are by their very nature
contradictory, as is shown in the writings of Galileo. Space is what
first gives rise to, in other words, the Antinomies, and space depends
@@ -2713,7 +2816,7 @@
in itself concerning the existence of our synthetic judgements in
general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, I assert that,
+\@@_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, I assert that,
so far as regards metaphysics, our knowledge proves the validity of,
on the contrary, the manifold, yet the objects in space and time are
what first give rise to, in the study of formal logic, the paralogisms
@@ -2730,7 +2833,7 @@
themselves, since knowledge of our faculties is a priori. But this is
to be dismissed as random groping.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our understanding can not take account of our
+\@@_newpara:n {Our understanding can not take account of our
faculties; certainly, the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions is what first gives rise to, therefore, the
things in themselves. It is not at all certain that, then, time
@@ -2747,7 +2850,7 @@
contradict the things in themselves, as any dedicated reader can
clearly see.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves are just as necessary as the
+\@@_newpara:n {The things in themselves are just as necessary as the
never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions. As any
dedicated reader can clearly see, the architectonic of natural reason
(and it remains a mystery why this is true) can thereby determine in
@@ -2765,7 +2868,7 @@
manifold stands in need of, for these reasons, the Antinomies, by
virtue of human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of practical reason, there can be no doubt
+\@@_newpara:n {By virtue of practical reason, there can be no doubt
that our experience, still, occupies part of the sphere of the
manifold concerning the existence of our analytic judgements in
general; as I have elsewhere shown, the Categories can never, as a
@@ -2790,7 +2893,7 @@
some of it must be known a priori. This may be clear with an
example.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The transcendental unity of apperception, so far as
+\@@_newpara:n {The transcendental unity of apperception, so far as
regards the Ideal of practical reason and the noumena, abstracts from
all content of a posteriori knowledge, by virtue of human reason. To
avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that, that is to
@@ -2811,7 +2914,7 @@
to do with hypothetical principles. Our ideas have nothing to do with
the transcendental aesthetic.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In the case of philosophy, the Transcendental
+\@@_newpara:n {In the case of philosophy, the Transcendental
Deduction proves the validity of necessity, by means of analysis. Our
sense perceptions have lying before them, certainly, our experience.
There can be no doubt that space (and it remains a mystery why this is
@@ -2825,7 +2928,7 @@
ideas, yet the things in themselves, in natural theology, can be
treated like the transcendental aesthetic.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Galileo, it remains a
+\@@_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Galileo, it remains a
mystery why, so far as I know, the phenomena are the mere results of
the power of the Ideal of pure reason, a blind but indispensable
function of the soul, but the paralogisms (and there can be no doubt
@@ -2850,7 +2953,7 @@
made to contradict the transcendental unity of apperception. But the
proof of this is a task from which we can here be absolved. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Hume, the noumena
+\@@_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Hume, the noumena
should only be used as a canon for the Categories. As is proven in
the ontological manuals, our sense perceptions, consequently, are by
their very nature contradictory; therefore, our experience (and it
@@ -2865,7 +2968,7 @@
the other hand, the Ideal of natural reason (and there can be no doubt
that this is true) is a representation of the manifold.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {I assert, certainly, that, irrespective of all
+\@@_newpara:n {I assert, certainly, that, irrespective of all
empirical conditions, the Categories are just as necessary as, on the
other hand, the thing in itself, yet the manifold proves the validity
of, on the other hand, the employment of the transcendental unity of
@@ -2880,7 +2983,7 @@
paralogisms of natural reason, when thus treated as our ideas, can be
treated like philosophy.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, our faculties
+\@@_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, our faculties
stand in need to the transcendental objects in space and time;
certainly, our ideas are a representation of the objects in space and
time. The reader should be careful to observe that the Categories
@@ -2895,7 +2998,7 @@
noumena and the things in themselves? The employment of the
Antinomies is the key to understanding our ideas.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
+\@@_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
employment of the transcendental aesthetic, still, exists in our sense
perceptions; as I have elsewhere shown, the phenomena exist in the
discipline of practical reason. Necessity (and Aristotle tells us
@@ -2917,7 +3020,7 @@
know, can not take account of our sense perceptions. Let us suppose
that our ideas are a representation of metaphysics.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of human reason, the Ideal of pure reason,
+\@@_newpara:n {By virtue of human reason, the Ideal of pure reason,
in the full sense of these terms, is by its very nature contradictory,
yet necessity is the key to understanding metaphysics. The Categories
have nothing to do with, therefore, the phenomena. We can deduce that
@@ -2930,7 +3033,7 @@
of human reason are the clue to the discovery of, on the contrary, our
understanding.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that, in reference to ends, the
+\@@_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that, in reference to ends, the
thing in itself excludes the possibility of the objects in space and
time, but the discipline of human reason is by its very nature
contradictory. It is obvious that, in other words, the manifold, in
@@ -2941,7 +3044,7 @@
Metaphysics exists in our speculative judgements. By means of
analysis, the phenomena are a representation of our faculties.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The phenomena stand in need to our sense perceptions,
+\@@_newpara:n {The phenomena stand in need to our sense perceptions,
but our concepts are the clue to the discovery of formal logic. The
objects in space and time have nothing to do with the things in
themselves, as is evident upon close examination. Time teaches us
@@ -2957,7 +3060,7 @@
priori concepts, on the other hand, are what first give rise to the
Ideal of human reason, as any dedicated reader can clearly see.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that, then,
+\@@_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that, then,
the Ideal of human reason, in reference to ends, is the mere result of
the power of practical reason, a blind but indispensable function of
the soul, but the Ideal (and the reader should be careful to observe
@@ -2981,7 +3084,7 @@
before them the employment of necessity, by means of analytic unity.
}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As will easily be shown in the next section, it is not
+\@@_newpara:n {As will easily be shown in the next section, it is not
at all certain that the transcendental unity of apperception is the
key to understanding the things in themselves; certainly, the
Categories prove the validity of our faculties. Let us suppose that
@@ -2997,7 +3100,7 @@
as I have elsewhere shown, the Categories. The question of this
matter's relation to objects is not in any way under discussion.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that, so regarded, our
+\@@_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that, so regarded, our
experience, in particular, can thereby determine in its totality our
analytic judgements, yet necessity has nothing to do with, in
reference to ends, the discipline of human reason. It is not at all
@@ -3021,7 +3124,7 @@
the series of empirical conditions only in so far as it is founded on
hypothetical principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves prove the validity of, on the
+\@@_newpara:n {The things in themselves prove the validity of, on the
other hand, transcendental logic; therefore, necessity has lying
before it, indeed, the paralogisms. What we have alone been able to
show is that our ideas constitute a body of demonstrated doctrine, and
@@ -3034,7 +3137,7 @@
and time, that is to say, has lying before it the things in
themselves. Natural causes prove the validity of necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that our a
+\@@_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that our a
priori concepts, in other words, can never, as a whole, furnish a true
and demonstrated science, because, like general logic, they prove the
validity of hypothetical principles, by virtue of human reason. There
@@ -3049,7 +3152,7 @@
in space and time, but the Ideal, indeed, is the key to understanding
our understanding.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, it is not at all certain that
+\@@_newpara:n {As we have already seen, it is not at all certain that
the Ideal of pure reason is just as necessary as natural causes; in
the case of the Transcendental Deduction, our faculties, in natural
theology, abstract from all content of knowledge. The Categories can
@@ -3064,7 +3167,7 @@
reason, so far as I know, would be falsified, because of our necessary
ignorance of the conditions. Our faculties would be falsified.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Ideal proves the validity of the objects in space
+\@@_newpara:n {The Ideal proves the validity of the objects in space
and time. To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain
that our judgements are a representation of, however, the manifold.
The objects in space and time exclude the possibility of necessity.
@@ -3073,7 +3176,7 @@
indeed, the objects in space and time would thereby be made to
contradict human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It is obvious that the transcendental unity of
+\@@_newpara:n {It is obvious that the transcendental unity of
apperception can be treated like the Ideal. I assert that applied
logic (and it is not at all certain that this is true) stands in need
of the objects in space and time; certainly, the Ideal of practical
@@ -3093,7 +3196,7 @@
experience is what first gives rise to the architectonic of practical
reason. This may be clear with an example. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {I assert, consequently, that the Transcendental
+\@@_newpara:n {I assert, consequently, that the Transcendental
Deduction would thereby be made to contradict our faculties, as will
easily be shown in the next section. Let us suppose that our ideas,
in the full sense of these terms, occupy part of the sphere of formal
@@ -3116,7 +3219,7 @@
teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of, then, the
Ideal of pure reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, the things in
+\@@_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, the things in
themselves are the clue to the discovery of the phenomena, and
philosophy (and what we have alone been able to show is that this is
true) teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of the
@@ -3132,7 +3235,7 @@
Ideal of human reason, as we have already seen. The noumena prove the
validity of, in the study of transcendental logic, our understanding.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Space (and what we have alone been able to show is
+\@@_newpara:n {Space (and what we have alone been able to show is
that this is true) stands in need of necessity, yet our understanding,
so far as regards the Ideal of practical reason, can never furnish a
true and demonstrated science, because, like the transcendental unity
@@ -3156,7 +3259,7 @@
the pure employment of the discipline of natural reason has lying
before it our experience.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Still, it must not be supposed that our faculties are
+\@@_newpara:n {Still, it must not be supposed that our faculties are
a representation of the Ideal of practical reason, as is evident upon
close examination. As is proven in the ontological manuals, the
reader should be careful to observe that the objects in space and time
@@ -3177,7 +3280,7 @@
it is not at all certain that this is the case) are the clue to the
discovery of our concepts. But this need not worry us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The architectonic of natural reason is the key to
+\@@_newpara:n {The architectonic of natural reason is the key to
understanding, so far as regards our a posteriori knowledge and the
paralogisms, time; still, the Categories, with the sole exception of
the never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions, should
@@ -3195,7 +3298,7 @@
nothing to do with the objects in space and time. We thus have a pure
synthesis of apprehension.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since none of the noumena are hypothetical, there can
+\@@_newpara:n {Since none of the noumena are hypothetical, there can
be no doubt that, in particular, our knowledge, in other words, is the
clue to the discovery of the things in themselves. Therefore, the
Ideal is just as necessary as, then, the Ideal, as will easily be
@@ -3209,7 +3312,7 @@
transcendental logic, constitute the whole content of the things in
themselves, as any dedicated reader can clearly see.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Transcendental logic can thereby determine in its
+\@@_newpara:n {Transcendental logic can thereby determine in its
totality, consequently, our faculties, because of our necessary
ignorance of the conditions. Since some of the paralogisms are
analytic, there can be no doubt that, in reference to ends, the
@@ -3228,7 +3331,7 @@
Our understanding is a representation of the objects in space and
time, and the paralogisms are just as necessary as our experience.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Philosophy (and it must not be supposed that this is
+\@@_newpara:n {Philosophy (and it must not be supposed that this is
true) is a representation of the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions; however, the Antinomies have nothing to do with,
in the study of philosophy, the discipline of practical reason.
@@ -3249,7 +3352,7 @@
human reason relies on the Antinomies, can thereby determine in its
totality natural causes.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Hume, it remains a
+\@@_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Hume, it remains a
mystery why our judgements exclude the possibility of the
transcendental aesthetic; therefore, the transcendental aesthetic can
not take account of the thing in itself. Our knowledge depends on,
@@ -3268,170 +3371,170 @@
%
% Now we define the sequence of index words.
% \begin{macrocode}
-\kgl_newword:n {Ideal}
-\kgl_newword:n {noumena}
-\kgl_newword:n {Aristotle}
-\kgl_newword:n {transcendental}
-\kgl_newword:n {metaphysics}
-\kgl_newword:n {reason}
-\kgl_newword:n {science}
-\kgl_newword:n {necessity}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {philosophy}
-\kgl_newword:n {knowledge}
-\kgl_newword:n {regress}
-\kgl_newword:n {paralogism}
-\kgl_newword:n {empirical}
-\kgl_newword:n {space}
-\kgl_newword:n {manifold}
-\kgl_newword:n {understanding}
-\kgl_newword:n {aesthetic}
-\kgl_newword:n {noumena}
-\kgl_newword:n {sphere}
-\kgl_newword:n {time}
-\kgl_newword:n {practical reason}
-\kgl_newword:n {perception}
-\kgl_newword:n {things in themselves}
-\kgl_newword:n {doctrine}
-\kgl_newword:n {regress}
-\kgl_newword:n {mystery}
-\kgl_newword:n {existence}
-\kgl_newword:n {contradiction}
-\kgl_newword:n {a priori}
-\kgl_newword:n {natural causes}
-\kgl_newword:n {analysis}
-\kgl_newword:n {apperception}
-\kgl_newword:n {Antinomies}
-\kgl_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
-\kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
-\kgl_newword:n {formal logic}
-\kgl_newword:n {soul}
-\kgl_newword:n {misapprehension}
-\kgl_newword:n {elsewhere}
-\kgl_newword:n {theology}
-\kgl_newword:n {employment}
-\kgl_newword:n {logic}
-\kgl_newword:n {practical reason}
-\kgl_newword:n {theoretical sciences}
-\kgl_newword:n {a posteriori}
-\kgl_newword:n {mystery}
-\kgl_newword:n {philosophy}
-\kgl_newword:n {things in themselves}
-\kgl_newword:n {experience}
-\kgl_newword:n {contradictory}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {perceptions}
-\kgl_newword:n {Galileo}
-\kgl_newword:n {apperception}
-\kgl_newword:n {empirical objects}
-\kgl_newword:n {judgements}
-\kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
-\kgl_newword:n {power}
-\kgl_newword:n {hypothetical principles}
-\kgl_newword:n {transcendental logic}
-\kgl_newword:n {doctrine}
-\kgl_newword:n {understanding}
-\kgl_newword:n {totality}
-\kgl_newword:n {manifold}
-\kgl_newword:n {inductive judgements}
-\kgl_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
-\kgl_newword:n {analytic unity}
-\kgl_newword:n {Hume}
-\kgl_newword:n {canon}
-\kgl_newword:n {knowledge}
-\kgl_newword:n {universal}
-\kgl_newword:n {section}
-\kgl_newword:n {body}
-\kgl_newword:n {ignorance}
-\kgl_newword:n {sense perceptions}
-\kgl_newword:n {natural reason}
-\kgl_newword:n {exception}
-\kgl_newword:n {ampliative judgements}
-\kgl_newword:n {experience}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {analysis}
-\kgl_newword:n {philosophy}
-\kgl_newword:n {apperception}
-\kgl_newword:n {paralogism}
-\kgl_newword:n {ignorance}
-\kgl_newword:n {true}
-\kgl_newword:n {space}
-\kgl_newword:n {Ideal}
-\kgl_newword:n {accordance}
-\kgl_newword:n {regress}
-\kgl_newword:n {experience}
-\kgl_newword:n {a priori}
-\kgl_newword:n {disjunctive}
-\kgl_newword:n {soul}
-\kgl_newword:n {understanding}
-\kgl_newword:n {analytic unity}
-\kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
-\kgl_newword:n {practical reason}
-\kgl_newword:n {cause}
-\kgl_newword:n {manuals}
-\kgl_newword:n {dedicated reader}
-\kgl_newword:n {a posteriori}
-\kgl_newword:n {employment}
-\kgl_newword:n {natural theology}
-\kgl_newword:n {manifold}
-\kgl_newword:n {transcendental aesthetic}
-\kgl_newword:n {close}
-\kgl_newword:n {full}
-\kgl_newword:n {Aristotle}
-\kgl_newword:n {clue}
-\kgl_newword:n {me}
-\kgl_newword:n {account}
-\kgl_newword:n {things}
-\kgl_newword:n {sense}
-\kgl_newword:n {intelligible}
-\kgl_newword:n {understanding}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {never}
-\kgl_newword:n {apperception}
-\kgl_newword:n {Ideal}
-\kgl_newword:n {need}
-\kgl_newword:n {space}
-\kgl_newword:n {virtue}
-\kgl_newword:n {Hume}
-\kgl_newword:n {still}
-\kgl_newword:n {whatsoever}
-\kgl_newword:n {even}
-\kgl_newword:n {sphere}
-\kgl_newword:n {position}
-\kgl_newword:n {ignorance}
-\kgl_newword:n {word}
-\kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
-\kgl_newword:n {theology}
-\kgl_newword:n {mystery}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {perception}
-\kgl_newword:n {power}
-\kgl_newword:n {experience}
-\kgl_newword:n {never-ending}
-\kgl_newword:n {analytic}
-\kgl_newword:n {itself}
-\kgl_newword:n {a priori}
-\kgl_newword:n {rule}
-\kgl_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
-\kgl_newword:n {empirical conditions}
-\kgl_newword:n {knowledge}
-\kgl_newword:n {disjunctive}
-\kgl_newword:n {transcendental}
-\kgl_newword:n {science}
-\kgl_newword:n {falsified}
-\kgl_newword:n {reader}
-\kgl_newword:n {blind}
-\kgl_newword:n {employment}
-\kgl_newword:n {discipline}
-\kgl_newword:n {function}
-\kgl_newword:n {careful}
-\kgl_newword:n {Aristotle}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {part}
-\kgl_newword:n {noumena}
-\kgl_newword:n {doubt}
-\kgl_newword:n {duck}
-\kgl_newword:n {Kant}
+\@@_newword:n {Ideal}
+\@@_newword:n {noumena}
+\@@_newword:n {Aristotle}
+\@@_newword:n {transcendental}
+\@@_newword:n {metaphysics}
+\@@_newword:n {reason}
+\@@_newword:n {science}
+\@@_newword:n {necessity}
+\@@_newword:n {Categories}
+\@@_newword:n {philosophy}
+\@@_newword:n {knowledge}
+\@@_newword:n {regress}
+\@@_newword:n {paralogism}
+\@@_newword:n {empirical}
+\@@_newword:n {space}
+\@@_newword:n {manifold}
+\@@_newword:n {understanding}
+\@@_newword:n {aesthetic}
+\@@_newword:n {noumena}
+\@@_newword:n {sphere}
+\@@_newword:n {time}
+\@@_newword:n {practical reason}
+\@@_newword:n {perception}
+\@@_newword:n {things in themselves}
+\@@_newword:n {doctrine}
+\@@_newword:n {regress}
+\@@_newword:n {mystery}
+\@@_newword:n {existence}
+\@@_newword:n {contradiction}
+\@@_newword:n {a priori}
+\@@_newword:n {natural causes}
+\@@_newword:n {analysis}
+\@@_newword:n {apperception}
+\@@_newword:n {Antinomies}
+\@@_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
+\@@_newword:n {phenomena}
+\@@_newword:n {formal logic}
+\@@_newword:n {soul}
+\@@_newword:n {misapprehension}
+\@@_newword:n {elsewhere}
+\@@_newword:n {theology}
+\@@_newword:n {employment}
+\@@_newword:n {logic}
+\@@_newword:n {practical reason}
+\@@_newword:n {theoretical sciences}
+\@@_newword:n {a posteriori}
+\@@_newword:n {mystery}
+\@@_newword:n {philosophy}
+\@@_newword:n {things in themselves}
+\@@_newword:n {experience}
+\@@_newword:n {contradictory}
+\@@_newword:n {Categories}
+\@@_newword:n {perceptions}
+\@@_newword:n {Galileo}
+\@@_newword:n {apperception}
+\@@_newword:n {empirical objects}
+\@@_newword:n {judgements}
+\@@_newword:n {phenomena}
+\@@_newword:n {power}
+\@@_newword:n {hypothetical principles}
+\@@_newword:n {transcendental logic}
+\@@_newword:n {doctrine}
+\@@_newword:n {understanding}
+\@@_newword:n {totality}
+\@@_newword:n {manifold}
+\@@_newword:n {inductive judgements}
+\@@_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
+\@@_newword:n {analytic unity}
+\@@_newword:n {Hume}
+\@@_newword:n {canon}
+\@@_newword:n {knowledge}
+\@@_newword:n {universal}
+\@@_newword:n {section}
+\@@_newword:n {body}
+\@@_newword:n {ignorance}
+\@@_newword:n {sense perceptions}
+\@@_newword:n {natural reason}
+\@@_newword:n {exception}
+\@@_newword:n {ampliative judgements}
+\@@_newword:n {experience}
+\@@_newword:n {Categories}
+\@@_newword:n {analysis}
+\@@_newword:n {philosophy}
+\@@_newword:n {apperception}
+\@@_newword:n {paralogism}
+\@@_newword:n {ignorance}
+\@@_newword:n {true}
+\@@_newword:n {space}
+\@@_newword:n {Ideal}
+\@@_newword:n {accordance}
+\@@_newword:n {regress}
+\@@_newword:n {experience}
+\@@_newword:n {a priori}
+\@@_newword:n {disjunctive}
+\@@_newword:n {soul}
+\@@_newword:n {understanding}
+\@@_newword:n {analytic unity}
+\@@_newword:n {phenomena}
+\@@_newword:n {practical reason}
+\@@_newword:n {cause}
+\@@_newword:n {manuals}
+\@@_newword:n {dedicated reader}
+\@@_newword:n {a posteriori}
+\@@_newword:n {employment}
+\@@_newword:n {natural theology}
+\@@_newword:n {manifold}
+\@@_newword:n {transcendental aesthetic}
+\@@_newword:n {close}
+\@@_newword:n {full}
+\@@_newword:n {Aristotle}
+\@@_newword:n {clue}
+\@@_newword:n {me}
+\@@_newword:n {account}
+\@@_newword:n {things}
+\@@_newword:n {sense}
+\@@_newword:n {intelligible}
+\@@_newword:n {understanding}
+\@@_newword:n {Categories}
+\@@_newword:n {never}
+\@@_newword:n {apperception}
+\@@_newword:n {Ideal}
+\@@_newword:n {need}
+\@@_newword:n {space}
+\@@_newword:n {virtue}
+\@@_newword:n {Hume}
+\@@_newword:n {still}
+\@@_newword:n {whatsoever}
+\@@_newword:n {even}
+\@@_newword:n {sphere}
+\@@_newword:n {position}
+\@@_newword:n {ignorance}
+\@@_newword:n {word}
+\@@_newword:n {phenomena}
+\@@_newword:n {theology}
+\@@_newword:n {mystery}
+\@@_newword:n {Categories}
+\@@_newword:n {perception}
+\@@_newword:n {power}
+\@@_newword:n {experience}
+\@@_newword:n {never-ending}
+\@@_newword:n {analytic}
+\@@_newword:n {itself}
+\@@_newword:n {a priori}
+\@@_newword:n {rule}
+\@@_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
+\@@_newword:n {empirical conditions}
+\@@_newword:n {knowledge}
+\@@_newword:n {disjunctive}
+\@@_newword:n {transcendental}
+\@@_newword:n {science}
+\@@_newword:n {falsified}
+\@@_newword:n {reader}
+\@@_newword:n {blind}
+\@@_newword:n {employment}
+\@@_newword:n {discipline}
+\@@_newword:n {function}
+\@@_newword:n {careful}
+\@@_newword:n {Aristotle}
+\@@_newword:n {Categories}
+\@@_newword:n {part}
+\@@_newword:n {noumena}
+\@@_newword:n {doubt}
+\@@_newword:n {duck}
+\@@_newword:n {Kant}
% \end{macrocode}
%
% Finally we close the group and issue a message in the log file
@@ -3439,7 +3542,7 @@
% \begin{macrocode}
\group_end:
\msg_info:nnx {kantlipsum} {how-many}
- { \int_eval:n {\seq_count:N \g_kgl_pars_seq} }
+ { \int_eval:n {\seq_count:N \g_@@_pars_seq} }
% \end{macrocode}
%
% \iffalse
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.ins
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.ins 2017-11-20 22:01:07 UTC (rev 45865)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/source/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.ins 2017-11-20 22:01:33 UTC (rev 45866)
@@ -1,36 +1,61 @@
-\iffalse meta-comment
+%%
+%% This is file `kantlipsum.ins',
+%% generated with the docstrip utility.
+%%
+%% The original source files were:
+%%
+%% kantlipsum.dtx (with options: `install')
+%% ---------------------------------------------------------------
+%% The kantlipsum package --- Generate text in Kant's style
+%% Maintained by Enrico Gregorio
+%% E-mail: enrico DOT gregorio AT univr DOT it
+%% Released under the LaTeX Project Public License v1.3c or later
+%% See http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+%% ---------------------------------------------------------------
+\input l3docstrip.tex
+\keepsilent
+\askforoverwritefalse
+\preamble
+---------------------------------------------------------------
+The kantlipsum package --- Generate text in Kant's style
+Maintained by Enrico Gregorio
+E-mail: enrico DOT gregorio AT univr DOT it
+Released under the LaTeX Project Public License v1.3c or later
+See http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+---------------------------------------------------------------
+\endpreamble
+\postamble
+Copyright (C) 2011-2017 by
+ Enrico Gregorio
+ enrico DOT gregorio AT univr DOT it
-File kantlipsum.ins Copyright (C) 2011-2012 Enrico Gregorio
-
It may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the
LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL), either version 1.3c of this
license or (at your option) any later version. The latest version
of this license is in the file
-
- http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
-
-This file is part of the "kantlipsum bundle" (The Work in LPPL)
-and all files in that bundle must be distributed together.
-
-The released version of this bundle is available from CTAN.
-
-\fi
-
-\input docstrip.tex
-\askforoverwritefalse
-
-\preamble
-
-Do not distribute this file without also distributing the
-source files specified above.
-
-\endpreamble
-% stop docstrip adding \endinput
-\postamble
+ http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+This work consists of the file kantlipsum.dtx
+ and the derived files kantlipsum.pdf,
+ kantlipsum.sty and
+ kantlipsum.ins.
\endpostamble
-
-\keepsilent
-
-\generate{\file{kantlipsum.sty} {\from{kantlipsum.dtx} {package}}}
-
+\usedir{tex/latex/kantlipsum}
+\generate{
+ \file{\jobname.sty}{\from{\jobname.dtx}{package}}
+}
\endbatchfile
+%% Copyright (C) 2011-2017 by
+%% Enrico Gregorio
+%% enrico DOT gregorio AT univr DOT it
+%%
+%% It may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the
+%% LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL), either version 1.3c of this
+%% license or (at your option) any later version. The latest version
+%% of this license is in the file
+%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+%% This work consists of the file kantlipsum.dtx
+%% and the derived files kantlipsum.pdf,
+%% kantlipsum.sty and
+%% kantlipsum.ins.
+%%
+%% End of file `kantlipsum.ins'.
Modified: trunk/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.sty
===================================================================
--- trunk/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.sty 2017-11-20 22:01:07 UTC (rev 45865)
+++ trunk/Master/texmf-dist/tex/latex/kantlipsum/kantlipsum.sty 2017-11-20 22:01:33 UTC (rev 45866)
@@ -5,64 +5,54 @@
%% The original source files were:
%%
%% kantlipsum.dtx (with options: `package')
-%%
-%% Do not distribute this file without also distributing the
-%% source files specified above.
-%%
-%% File: kantlipsum.dtx (C) Copyright 2011-2012 Enrico Gregorio
-%%
-%% It may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the
-%% LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL), either version 1.3c of this
-%% license or (at your option) any later version. The latest version
-%% of this license is in the file
-%%
-%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
-%%
-%% This file is part of the "kantlipsum bundle" (The Work in LPPL)
-%% and all files in that bundle must be distributed together.
-%%
-%% The released version of this bundle is available from CTAN.
-%%
-\RequirePackage{expl3}
-\GetIdInfo$Id: kantlipsum.dtx 0.6 2012-10-14 12:00:00Z Enrico $
- {Dummy text in Kantian style}
+%% ---------------------------------------------------------------
+%% The kantlipsum package --- Generate text in Kant's style
+%% Maintained by Enrico Gregorio
+%% E-mail: enrico DOT gregorio AT univr DOT it
+%% Released under the LaTeX Project Public License v1.3c or later
+%% See http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+%% ---------------------------------------------------------------
+\RequirePackage{expl3}[2017/11/14]
+\RequirePackage{xparse}
\ProvidesExplPackage
- {\ExplFileName}{\ExplFileDate}{\ExplFileVersion}{\ExplFileDescription}
-\@ifpackagelater { expl3 } { 2012/07/15 }
+ {kantlipsum}
+ {2017/11/16}
+ {0.7}
+ {Generate text in Kantian style}
+\@ifpackagelater { expl3 } { 2017/11/14 }
{ }
{
- \PackageError { kantlipsum } { Support~package~l3kernel~too~old. }
+ \PackageError { kantlipsum } { Support~package~expl3~too~old }
{
- Please~install~an~up~to~date~version~of~l3kernel~
- using~your~TeX~package~manager~or~from~CTAN.\\ \\
- Loading~xparse~will~abort!
+ You~need~to~update~your~installation~of~the~bundles~
+ 'l3kernel'~and~'l3packages'.\MessageBreak
+ Loading~kantlipsum~will~abort!
}
\tex_endinput:D
}
\DeclareOption { par }
{
- \cs_set_protected:Nn \kgl_star: { \c_space_tl }
- \cs_set_protected:Nn \kgl_nostar: { \par }
+ \cs_set_protected:Nn \__kgl_star: { \c_space_tl }
+ \cs_set_protected:Nn \__kgl_nostar: { \par }
}
\DeclareOption{ nopar }
{
- \cs_set_protected:Nn \kgl_star: { \par }
- \cs_set_protected:Nn \kgl_nostar: { \c_space_tl }
+ \cs_set_protected:Nn \__kgl_star: { \par }
+ \cs_set_protected:Nn \__kgl_nostar: { \c_space_tl }
}
\DeclareOption{ numbers }
- { \cs_set_protected:Nn \kgl_number:n { #1\nobreakspace\textbullet\nobreakspace } }
+ { \cs_set_protected:Nn \__kgl_number:n { #1\nobreak\enspace\textbullet\nobreak\enspace } }
-\bool_new:N \g_kgl_makeindex_bool
-\bool_gset_false:N \g_kgl_makeindex_bool
+\bool_new:N \g__kgl_makeindex_bool
+\bool_gset_false:N \g__kgl_makeindex_bool
\DeclareOption{ index }
- { \bool_gset_true:N \g_kgl_makeindex_bool }
+ { \bool_gset_true:N \g__kgl_makeindex_bool }
-\cs_new_eq:NN \kgl_number:n \use_none:n
+\cs_new_eq:NN \__kgl_number:n \use_none:n
\ExecuteOptions{par}
\ProcessOptions \scan_stop:
-\RequirePackage{xparse}
\msg_new:nnn {kantlipsum}{how-many}
{The~package~provides~paragraphs~1~to~#1.~
Values~outside~this~range~will~be~ignored.}
@@ -70,63 +60,64 @@
{Control~sequence~#1~already~defined.}
{The~control~sequence~#1~is~already~defined,~
I'll~ignore~it}
-\int_new:N \l_kgl_start_int
-\int_new:N \l_kgl_end_int
-\seq_new:N \g_kgl_pars_seq
-\seq_new:N \g_kgl_words_seq
+\int_new:N \l__kgl_start_int
+\int_new:N \l__kgl_end_int
+\seq_new:N \g__kgl_pars_seq
+\seq_new:N \g__kgl_words_seq
\NewDocumentCommand{\kant}{s>{\SplitArgument{1}{-}}O{1-7}}
{
\group_begin:
\IfBooleanTF{#1}
- { \cs_set_eq:NN \kgl_par: \kgl_star: }
- { \cs_set_eq:NN \kgl_par: \kgl_nostar: }
- \kgl_process:nn #2
- \kgl_print:
+ { \cs_set_eq:NN \__kgl_par: \__kgl_star: }
+ { \cs_set_eq:NN \__kgl_par: \__kgl_nostar: }
+ \__kgl_process:nn #2
+ \__kgl_print:
\group_end:
}
\NewDocumentCommand{\kantdef}{mm}
{
\group_begin:
- \cs_set_eq:NN \kgl_number:n \use_none:n
- \cs_set_eq:NN \kgl_par: \prg_do_nothing:
+ \cs_set_eq:NN \__kgl_number:n \use_none:n
+ \cs_set_eq:NN \__kgl_par: \prg_do_nothing:
\cs_if_exist:NTF #1
{
\msg_error:nnn {kantlipsum} {already-defined} {#1}
}
{
- \tl_set:Nx \l_tmpa_tl { \seq_item:Nn \g_kgl_pars_seq {#2} }
+ \tl_set:Nx \l_tmpa_tl { \seq_item:Nn \g__kgl_pars_seq {#2} }
\cs_new:Npx #1 { \l_tmpa_tl }
}
\group_end:
}
-\cs_new_protected:Nn \kgl_process:nn
+\cs_new_protected:Nn \__kgl_process:nn
{
- \int_set:Nn \l_kgl_start_int {#1}
- \IfNoValueTF{#2}
- { \int_set:Nn \l_kgl_end_int {#1} }
- { \int_set:Nn \l_kgl_end_int {#2} }
+ \int_set:Nn \l__kgl_start_int {#1}
+ \tl_if_novalue:nTF {#2}
+ { \int_set:Nn \l__kgl_end_int {#1} }
+ { \int_set:Nn \l__kgl_end_int {#2} }
}
-\cs_new_protected:Nn \kgl_print:
+\cs_new_protected:Nn \__kgl_print:
{
\int_step_function:nnnN
- {\l_kgl_start_int} {1} {\l_kgl_end_int} \kgl_use:n
+ {\l__kgl_start_int} {1} {\l__kgl_end_int} \__kgl_use:n
}
-\cs_new:Nn \kgl_use:n
- {
- \kgl_number:n {#1}
- \bool_if:NT \g_kgl_makeindex_bool
+\cs_new:Nn \__kgl_use:n
+ {
+ \int_compare:nNnF { #1 } > { \seq_count:N \g__kgl_pars_seq }
+ { \__kgl_number:n {#1} }
+ \bool_if:NT \g__kgl_makeindex_bool
{
- \use:x { \exp_not:N \index{ \seq_item:Nn \g_kgl_words_seq {#1} } }
+ \use:x { \exp_not:N \index{ \seq_item:Nn \g__kgl_words_seq {#1} } }
}
- \seq_item:Nn \g_kgl_pars_seq {#1}
- }
-\cs_new_protected:Nn \kgl_newpara:n
- { \seq_gput_right:Nn \g_kgl_pars_seq {#1\kgl_par:} }
-\cs_new_protected:Nn \kgl_newword:n
- { \seq_gput_right:Nn \g_kgl_words_seq {#1} }
+ \seq_item:Nn \g__kgl_pars_seq {#1}
+ }
+\cs_new_protected:Nn \__kgl_newpara:n
+ { \seq_gput_right:Nn \g__kgl_pars_seq {#1\__kgl_par:} }
+\cs_new_protected:Nn \__kgl_newword:n
+ { \seq_gput_right:Nn \g__kgl_words_seq {#1} }
\group_begin:
\char_set_catcode_space:n {`\ }
-\kgl_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, the Ideal of
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, the Ideal of
practical reason is a representation of, as far as I know, the things
in themselves; as I have shown elsewhere, the phenomena should only be
used as a canon for our understanding. The paralogisms of practical
@@ -140,7 +131,7 @@
unity. There can be no doubt that the objects in space and time are
what first give rise to human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Let us suppose that the noumena have nothing to do
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Let us suppose that the noumena have nothing to do
with necessity, since knowledge of the Categories is a
posteriori. Hume tells us that the transcendental unity of
apperception can not take account of the discipline of natural reason,
@@ -154,7 +145,7 @@
necessary as our experience. By means of the Ideal, our sense
perceptions are by their very nature contradictory.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, the things
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, the things
in themselves (and it remains a mystery why this is the case) are a
representation of time. Our concepts have lying before them the
paralogisms of natural reason, but our a posteriori concepts have
@@ -170,7 +161,7 @@
Ideal concerning the existence of the objects in space and time in
general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, what we have alone been able
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, what we have alone been able
to show is that the objects in space and time would be falsified; what
we have alone been able to show is that, our judgements are what first
give rise to metaphysics. As I have shown elsewhere, Aristotle tells
@@ -188,7 +179,7 @@
philosophy, but in a merely critical essay the simple mention of the
fact may suffice.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Therefore, we can deduce that the objects in space and
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Therefore, we can deduce that the objects in space and
time (and I assert, however, that this is the case) have lying before
them the objects in space and time. Because of our necessary ignorance
of the conditions, it must not be supposed that, then, formal logic
@@ -213,7 +204,7 @@
rise to the architectonic of pure reason, as is evident upon close
examination.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves are what first give rise to
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves are what first give rise to
reason, as is proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural
reason, let us suppose that the transcendental unity of apperception
abstracts from all content of knowledge; in view of these
@@ -229,7 +220,7 @@
supposed that the objects in space and time are what first give rise
to the employment of pure reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, to avoid all
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, to avoid all
misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that, on the contrary, the
never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions is a
representation of our inductive judgements, yet the things in
@@ -252,7 +243,7 @@
necessity. But the proof of this is a task from which we can here be
absolved.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Thus, the Antinomies exclude the possibility of, on
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Thus, the Antinomies exclude the possibility of, on
the other hand, natural causes, as will easily be shown in the next
section. Still, the reader should be careful to observe that the
phenomena have lying before them the intelligible objects in space and
@@ -272,7 +263,7 @@
The transcendental unity of apperception constitutes the whole content
for the noumena, by means of analytic unity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In all theoretical sciences, the paralogisms of human
+\__kgl_newpara:n {In all theoretical sciences, the paralogisms of human
reason would be falsified, as is proven in the ontological manuals.
The architectonic of human reason is what first gives rise to the
Categories. As any dedicated reader can clearly see, the paralogisms
@@ -282,7 +273,7 @@
be known a posteriori. Human reason occupies part of the sphere of
our experience concerning the existence of the phenomena in general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, our ampliative judgements
+\__kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, our ampliative judgements
would thereby be made to contradict, in all theoretical sciences, the
pure employment of the discipline of human reason. Because of our
necessary ignorance of the conditions, Hume tells us that the
@@ -296,7 +287,7 @@
Ideal occupies part of the sphere of our knowledge concerning the
existence of the phenomena in general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, what we have alone been
+\__kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, what we have alone been
able to show is that, in so far as this expounds the universal rules
of our a posteriori concepts, the architectonic of natural reason can
be treated like the architectonic of practical reason. Thus, our
@@ -310,7 +301,7 @@
space. By virtue of practical reason, the noumena, still, stand in
need to the pure employment of the things in themselves.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that the
objects in space and time are the clue to the discovery of, certainly,
our a priori knowledge, by means of analytic unity. Our faculties
abstract from all content of knowledge; for these reasons, the
@@ -334,7 +325,7 @@
aesthetic, yet our faculties have lying before them the architectonic
of human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {However, we can deduce that our experience (and it
+\__kgl_newpara:n {However, we can deduce that our experience (and it
must not be supposed that this is true) stands in need of our
experience, as we have already seen. On the other hand, it is not at
all certain that necessity is a representation of, by means of the
@@ -348,7 +339,7 @@
respect of the intelligible character, exist in the objects in space
and time.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our ideas, in the case of the Ideal of pure reason,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Our ideas, in the case of the Ideal of pure reason,
are by their very nature contradictory. The objects in space and time
can not take account of our understanding, and philosophy excludes the
possibility of, certainly, space. I assert that our ideas, by means
@@ -363,7 +354,7 @@
a complete system of transcendental philosophy, but in a merely
critical essay the simple mention of the fact may suffice.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of our faculties is a posteriori, pure
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of our faculties is a posteriori, pure
logic teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of, indeed,
the architectonic of human reason. As we have already seen, we can
deduce that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, the Ideal of
@@ -378,7 +369,7 @@
our judgements, as will easily be shown in the next section. This is
what chiefly concerns us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Time (and let us suppose that this is true) is the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Time (and let us suppose that this is true) is the
clue to the discovery of the Categories, as we have already seen.
Since knowledge of our faculties is a priori, to avoid all
misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that the empirical objects
@@ -392,7 +383,7 @@
space and time can be treated like the paralogisms of natural reason.
This is what chiefly concerns us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between pure logic and natural
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between pure logic and natural
causes, to avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that,
even as this relates to the thing in itself, pure reason constitutes
the whole content for our concepts, but the Ideal of practical reason
@@ -410,7 +401,7 @@
the transcendental aesthetic only in so far as it is founded on
analytic principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {With the sole exception of our a priori knowledge, our
+\__kgl_newpara:n {With the sole exception of our a priori knowledge, our
faculties have nothing to do with our faculties. Pure reason (and we
can deduce that this is true) would thereby be made to contradict the
phenomena. As we have already seen, let us suppose that the
@@ -422,7 +413,7 @@
knowledge, by means of analytic unity. Philosophy has nothing to do
with natural causes.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By means of analysis, our faculties stand in need to,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {By means of analysis, our faculties stand in need to,
indeed, the empirical objects in space and time. The objects in space
and time, for these reasons, have nothing to do with our
understanding. There can be no doubt that the noumena can not take
@@ -432,7 +423,7 @@
space, yet our sense perceptions exist in the discipline of practical
reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Ideal can not take account of, so far as I know,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The Ideal can not take account of, so far as I know,
our faculties. As we have already seen, the objects in space and time
are what first give rise to the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions; for these reasons, our a posteriori concepts
@@ -444,7 +435,7 @@
be made to contradict, indeed, our knowledge. Natural causes, so
regarded, exist in our judgements.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The never-ending regress in the series of empirical
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The never-ending regress in the series of empirical
conditions may not contradict itself, but it is still possible that it
may be in contradictions with, then, applied logic. The employment of
the noumena stands in need of space; with the sole exception of our
@@ -463,7 +454,7 @@
objects in space and time in general, as is proven in the ontological
manuals.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The transcendental unity of apperception, in the case
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The transcendental unity of apperception, in the case
of philosophy, is a body of demonstrated science, and some of it must
be known a posteriori. Thus, the objects in space and time, insomuch
as the discipline of practical reason relies on the Antinomies,
@@ -481,7 +472,7 @@
present remarks I am referring to time only in so far as it is founded
on disjunctive principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The discipline of pure reason is what first gives rise
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The discipline of pure reason is what first gives rise
to the Categories, but applied logic is the clue to the discovery of
our sense perceptions. The never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the
@@ -497,7 +488,7 @@
reasons, our sense perceptions stand in need to the manifold. Our
ideas are what first give rise to the paralogisms.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves have lying before them the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves have lying before them the
Antinomies, by virtue of human reason. By means of the transcendental
aesthetic, let us suppose that the discipline of natural reason
depends on natural causes, because of the relation between the
@@ -511,7 +502,7 @@
By means of analysis, the phenomena can not take account of natural
causes. This is not something we are in a position to establish.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since some of the things in themselves are a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since some of the things in themselves are a
posteriori, there can be no doubt that, when thus treated as our
understanding, pure reason depends on, still, the Ideal of natural
reason, and our speculative judgements constitute a body of
@@ -533,7 +524,7 @@
study of the Transcendental Deduction, would be falsified, but
metaphysics abstracts from all content of knowledge.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since some of natural causes are disjunctive, the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since some of natural causes are disjunctive, the
never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions is the key
to understanding, in particular, the noumena. By means of analysis,
the Categories (and it is not at all certain that this is the case)
@@ -555,7 +546,7 @@
ignorance of the conditions. But to this matter no answer is
possible.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since all of the objects in space and time are
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since all of the objects in space and time are
synthetic, it remains a mystery why, even as this relates to our
experience, our a priori concepts should only be used as a canon for
our judgements, but the phenomena should only be used as a canon for
@@ -571,7 +562,7 @@
manuals. Certainly, it remains a mystery why the manifold is just as
necessary as the manifold, as is evident upon close examination.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In natural theology, what we have alone been able to
+\__kgl_newpara:n {In natural theology, what we have alone been able to
show is that the architectonic of practical reason is the clue to the
discovery of, still, the manifold, by means of analysis. Since
knowledge of the objects in space and time is a priori, the things in
@@ -590,7 +581,7 @@
thing in itself; however, the objects in space and time exist in
natural causes.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {I assert, however, that our a posteriori concepts (and
+\__kgl_newpara:n {I assert, however, that our a posteriori concepts (and
it is obvious that this is the case) would thereby be made to
contradict the discipline of practical reason; however, the things in
themselves, however, constitute the whole content of philosophy. As
@@ -617,7 +608,7 @@
ignorance of the conditions, I assert that, indeed, the architectonic
of natural reason, as I have elsewhere shown, would be falsified.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In natural theology, the transcendental unity of
+\__kgl_newpara:n {In natural theology, the transcendental unity of
apperception has nothing to do with the Antinomies. As will easily be
shown in the next section, our sense perceptions are by their very
nature contradictory, but our ideas, with the sole exception of human
@@ -629,7 +620,7 @@
space and time can not take account of the Transcendental Deduction,
but our knowledge, on the other hand, would be falsified.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, our understanding is the clue
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, our understanding is the clue
to the discovery of necessity. On the other hand, the Ideal of pure
reason is a body of demonstrated science, and all of it must be known
a posteriori, as is evident upon close examination. It is obvious
@@ -640,7 +631,7 @@
experience depends on the Ideal of natural reason, as we have already
seen.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {For these reasons, space is the key to understanding
+\__kgl_newpara:n {For these reasons, space is the key to understanding
the thing in itself. Our sense perceptions abstract from all content
of a priori knowledge, but the phenomena can never, as a whole,
furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like time, they are
@@ -653,7 +644,7 @@
Deduction; in natural theology, the noumena are the clue to the
discovery of, so far as I know, the Transcendental Deduction.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
+\__kgl_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
explain that, in respect of the intelligible character, the
transcendental aesthetic depends on the objects in space and time, yet
the manifold is the clue to the discovery of the Transcendental
@@ -670,7 +661,7 @@
writings of Galileo, the transcendental unity of apperception stands
in need of, in the case of necessity, our speculative judgements.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The phenomena (and it is obvious that this is the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The phenomena (and it is obvious that this is the
case) prove the validity of our sense perceptions; in natural
theology, philosophy teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the
content of the transcendental objects in space and time. In natural
@@ -685,7 +676,7 @@
that, in accordance with the principles of the phenomena, the
Antinomies are a representation of metaphysics.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves can not take account of the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves can not take account of the
Transcendental Deduction. By means of analytic unity, it is obvious
that, that is to say, our sense perceptions, in all theoretical
sciences, can not take account of the thing in itself, yet the
@@ -697,7 +688,7 @@
themselves are a representation of, in accordance with the principles
of philosophy, our sense perceptions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, philosophy is
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, philosophy is
the mere result of the power of pure logic, a blind but indispensable
function of the soul; however, the phenomena can never, as a whole,
furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like general logic,
@@ -716,7 +707,7 @@
abstracts from all content of a posteriori knowledge. The question of
this matter's relation to objects is not in any way under discussion.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By means of the transcendental aesthetic, it remains a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {By means of the transcendental aesthetic, it remains a
mystery why the phenomena (and it is not at all certain that this is
the case) are the clue to the discovery of the never-ending regress in
the series of empirical conditions. In all theoretical sciences,
@@ -733,7 +724,7 @@
contradictory, by virtue of natural reason. This is the sense in
which it is to be understood in this work.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, let us suppose
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, let us suppose
that, in accordance with the principles of time, our a priori concepts
are the clue to the discovery of philosophy. By means of analysis, to
avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that, in
@@ -752,7 +743,7 @@
the validity of philosophy, yet pure reason is the key to
understanding the Categories. This is what chiefly concerns us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Natural causes, when thus treated as the things in
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Natural causes, when thus treated as the things in
themselves, abstract from all content of a posteriori knowledge, by
means of analytic unity. Our a posteriori knowledge, in other words,
is the key to understanding the Antinomies. As we have already seen,
@@ -774,7 +765,7 @@
on the paralogisms, the Transcendental Deduction, by means of
analysis.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, the Ideal constitutes the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, the Ideal constitutes the
whole content for the transcendental unity of apperception. By means
of analytic unity, let us suppose that, when thus treated as space,
our synthetic judgements, therefore, would be falsified, and the
@@ -794,7 +785,7 @@
the employment of the Antinomies. Let us apply this to our
experience.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {I assert, thus, that the discipline of natural reason
+\__kgl_newpara:n {I assert, thus, that the discipline of natural reason
can be treated like the transcendental aesthetic, since some of the
Categories are speculative. In the case of transcendental logic, our
ideas prove the validity of our understanding, as any dedicated reader
@@ -810,7 +801,7 @@
blind but indispensable function of the soul, as is proven in the
ontological manuals.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The noumena have nothing to do with, thus, the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The noumena have nothing to do with, thus, the
Antinomies. What we have alone been able to show is that the things
in themselves constitute the whole content of human reason, as is
proven in the ontological manuals. The noumena (and to avoid all
@@ -826,7 +817,7 @@
space and time are what first give rise to, in all theoretical
sciences, our a posteriori concepts.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our understanding excludes the possibility of
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Our understanding excludes the possibility of
practical reason. Our faculties stand in need to, consequently, the
never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions; still, the
employment of necessity is what first gives rise to general logic.
@@ -842,7 +833,7 @@
empirical objects in space and time prove the validity of natural
causes.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between space and the noumena,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between space and the noumena,
our experience is by its very nature contradictory. It is obvious
that natural causes constitute the whole content of the transcendental
unity of apperception, as any dedicated reader can clearly see. By
@@ -862,7 +853,7 @@
I am referring to the pure employment of our disjunctive judgements
only in so far as it is founded on inductive principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that our sense
+\__kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that our sense
perceptions are the clue to the discovery of our understanding; in
natural theology, necessity, in all theoretical sciences, occupies
part of the sphere of the transcendental unity of apperception
@@ -877,7 +868,7 @@
mystery why this is the case) are just as necessary as the Ideal of
human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, our
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, our
experience is the clue to the discovery of philosophy; in the study of
space, the Categories are what first give rise to the transcendental
aesthetic. As any dedicated reader can clearly see, the reader should
@@ -894,7 +885,7 @@
case) stand in need to the discipline of practical reason; thus, our
knowledge, indeed, can not take account of our ideas.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In the study of time, our concepts prove the validity
+\__kgl_newpara:n {In the study of time, our concepts prove the validity
of, as I have elsewhere shown, our understanding, as any dedicated
reader can clearly see. As will easily be shown in the next section,
the reader should be careful to observe that, so far as regards our
@@ -915,7 +906,7 @@
ideas. It remains a mystery why, then, the architectonic of practical
reason proves the validity of, therefore, the noumena.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The paralogisms of practical reason can be treated
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The paralogisms of practical reason can be treated
like the paralogisms. The objects in space and time, therefore, are
what first give rise to the discipline of human reason; in all
theoretical sciences, the things in themselves (and we can deduce that
@@ -933,7 +924,7 @@
Ideal of pure reason relies on the intelligible objects in space and
time, are by their very nature contradictory.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Time, on the contrary, can never furnish a true and
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Time, on the contrary, can never furnish a true and
demonstrated science, because, like the transcendental aesthetic, it
constitutes the whole content for ampliative principles, yet natural
reason, even as this relates to philosophy, proves the validity of the
@@ -952,7 +943,7 @@
Consequently, the Ideal of pure reason can be treated like the
phenomena. Let us apply this to the Transcendental Deduction.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that our a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that our a
posteriori concepts (and it is obvious that this is the case) are what
first give rise to the transcendental unity of apperception. In the
case of necessity, the reader should be careful to observe that
@@ -969,7 +960,7 @@
consequently, the architectonic of pure reason, in all theoretical
sciences, would be falsified.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Transcendental Deduction stands in need of the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The Transcendental Deduction stands in need of the
Ideal of pure reason, and the noumena, for these reasons, are by their
very nature contradictory. The objects in space and time have lying
before them our ideas. The transcendental unity of apperception,
@@ -984,7 +975,7 @@
and the discipline of pure reason abstracts from all content of a
priori knowledge. We thus have a pure synthesis of apprehension.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions,
what we have alone been able to show is that formal logic can not take
account of the Categories; in the study of the transcendental
aesthetic, philosophy can thereby determine in its totality the
@@ -1002,7 +993,7 @@
reader can clearly see. This is the sense in which it is to be
understood in this work.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that, in respect of the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that, in respect of the
intelligible character, the Antinomies (and we can deduce that this is
the case) constitute the whole content of the phenomena, yet the
Categories exist in natural causes. The Ideal of natural reason, when
@@ -1018,7 +1009,7 @@
perceptions (and there can be no doubt that this is the case) are what
first give rise to the discipline of practical reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Thus, the reader should be careful to observe that the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Thus, the reader should be careful to observe that the
noumena would thereby be made to contradict necessity, because of our
necessary ignorance of the conditions. Consequently, our sense
perceptions are just as necessary as the architectonic of natural
@@ -1036,7 +1027,7 @@
not take account of, for these reasons, the transcendental unity of
apperception.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that, for
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that, for
example, pure logic depends on the transcendental unity of
apperception. As any dedicated reader can clearly see, our a priori
concepts are what first give rise to the Categories. Hume tells us
@@ -1053,7 +1044,7 @@
will easily be shown in the next section. We thus have a pure
synthesis of apprehension.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Antinomies have nothing to do with our faculties.
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The Antinomies have nothing to do with our faculties.
As is shown in the writings of Hume, we can deduce that, on the
contrary, the empirical objects in space and time prove the validity
of our ideas. The manifold may not contradict itself, but it is still
@@ -1072,7 +1063,7 @@
have elsewhere shown, philosophy proves the validity of our sense
perceptions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
phenomena, so far as I know, exist in the noumena; however, our
concepts, however, exclude the possibility of our judgements. Galileo
tells us that our a posteriori knowledge would thereby be made to
@@ -1094,7 +1085,7 @@
some ground in the nature of the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
+\__kgl_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
explain that time excludes the possibility of the discipline of human
reason; in the study of practical reason, the manifold has nothing to
do with time. Because of the relation between our a priori knowledge
@@ -1109,7 +1100,7 @@
to the paralogisms of pure reason. As is shown in the writings of
Hume, space has nothing to do with, for example, necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {We can deduce that the Ideal of practical reason, even
+\__kgl_newpara:n {We can deduce that the Ideal of practical reason, even
as this relates to our knowledge, is a representation of the
discipline of human reason. The things in themselves are just as
necessary as our understanding. The noumena prove the validity of the
@@ -1121,7 +1112,7 @@
blind but indispensable function of the soul. The divisions are thus
provided; all that is required is to fill them.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The never-ending regress in the series of empirical
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The never-ending regress in the series of empirical
conditions can be treated like the objects in space and time. What we
have alone been able to show is that, then, the transcendental
aesthetic, in reference to ends, would thereby be made to contradict
@@ -1134,7 +1125,7 @@
explain that the things in themselves are a representation of, in
other words, necessity, as is evident upon close examination.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, it remains a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, it remains a
mystery why our experience is the mere result of the power of the
discipline of human reason, a blind but indispensable function of the
soul. For these reasons, the employment of the thing in itself
@@ -1155,7 +1146,7 @@
however, our faculties. But at present we shall turn our attention to
the thing in itself.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, we can deduce
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, we can deduce
that the transcendental unity of apperception depends on the Ideal of
practical reason. Certainly, it is obvious that the Antinomies, in
accordance with the principles of the objects in space and time,
@@ -1181,7 +1172,7 @@
itself, but the paralogisms prove the validity of transcendental
logic.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {We can deduce that, then, the noumena are just as
+\__kgl_newpara:n {We can deduce that, then, the noumena are just as
necessary as, so regarded, the practical employment of the objects in
space and time. It is obvious that the manifold has nothing to do
with our ideas; with the sole exception of the employment of the
@@ -1202,7 +1193,7 @@
that our ideas exclude the possibility of, irrespective of all
empirical conditions, our ideas. Let us apply this to space.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It remains a mystery why our sense perceptions prove
+\__kgl_newpara:n {It remains a mystery why our sense perceptions prove
the validity of our a priori concepts. The objects in space and time,
then, exist in metaphysics; therefore, the things in themselves can
not take account of the transcendental aesthetic. The Ideal of pure
@@ -1213,7 +1204,7 @@
themselves constitute a body of demonstrated doctrine, and some of
this body must be known a posteriori.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As will easily be shown in the next section, the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As will easily be shown in the next section, the
Transcendental Deduction exists in the Ideal. To avoid all
misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that pure reason (and it
is obvious that this is true) is the key to understanding the
@@ -1234,7 +1225,7 @@
faculties are just as necessary as the Categories, yet the manifold
has lying before it, certainly, our understanding.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It is obvious that the never-ending regress in the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {It is obvious that the never-ending regress in the
series of empirical conditions may not contradict itself, but it is
still possible that it may be in contradictions with the architectonic
of practical reason. The objects in space and time, so regarded,
@@ -1248,7 +1239,7 @@
just as necessary as the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Thus, transcendental logic (and I assert, for these
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Thus, transcendental logic (and I assert, for these
reasons, that this is true) depends on the Antinomies. Still, general
logic (and it remains a mystery why this is true) is what first gives
rise to the objects in space and time, because of the relation between
@@ -1267,7 +1258,7 @@
However, the objects in space and time are what first give rise to our
understanding, because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {On the other hand, the Antinomies have nothing to do
+\__kgl_newpara:n {On the other hand, the Antinomies have nothing to do
with pure reason, because of our necessary ignorance of the
conditions. Our speculative judgements are what first give rise to
the Categories. Time is the key to understanding natural causes, as
@@ -1280,7 +1271,7 @@
theology, the discipline of natural reason, on the other hand, would
be falsified, as any dedicated reader can clearly see.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In the case of the discipline of human reason, it is
+\__kgl_newpara:n {In the case of the discipline of human reason, it is
obvious that the phenomena, still, are the mere results of the power
of the practical employment of the Transcendental Deduction, a blind
but indispensable function of the soul, by means of analysis. As any
@@ -1304,7 +1295,7 @@
reason. Hume tells us that our ideas abstract from all content of a
posteriori knowledge, as is evident upon close examination.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The manifold is a representation of the phenomena.
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The manifold is a representation of the phenomena.
Our judgements constitute the whole content of, on the other hand, the
things in themselves, as will easily be shown in the next section. By
means of analytic unity, the phenomena, in the full sense of these
@@ -1314,7 +1305,7 @@
to understanding time. In the study of formal logic, the paralogisms
of pure reason are the clue to the discovery of, thus, the manifold.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that the never-ending regress in
+\__kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that the never-ending regress in
the series of empirical conditions may not contradict itself, but it
is still possible that it may be in contradictions with, indeed, our
sense perceptions. As is proven in the ontological manuals, the
@@ -1335,7 +1326,7 @@
function of the soul. The divisions are thus provided; all that is
required is to fill them.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, the Antinomies are a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, the Antinomies are a
representation of the Categories. Necessity stands in need of the
Antinomies. By virtue of natural reason, the Antinomies have lying
before them the Ideal of pure reason; on the other hand, the
@@ -1353,7 +1344,7 @@
of the necessary interconnection that we have in mind when we speak of
necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, the paralogisms
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, the paralogisms
abstract from all content of a posteriori knowledge. Consequently,
the transcendental aesthetic, in reference to ends, occupies part of
the sphere of metaphysics concerning the existence of the Categories
@@ -1372,7 +1363,7 @@
manifold, irrespective of all empirical conditions, is what first
gives rise to space.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, our experience
+\__kgl_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, our experience
occupies part of the sphere of the Ideal concerning the existence of
the objects in space and time in general, as will easily be shown in
the next section. It must not be supposed that our ideas (and it
@@ -1390,7 +1381,7 @@
because, like the architectonic of pure reason, it is just as
necessary as a priori principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
+\__kgl_newpara:n {To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
explain that philosophy can not take account of our sense perceptions;
in the study of the discipline of natural reason, our experience, in
the study of the architectonic of practical reason, is the mere result
@@ -1406,7 +1397,7 @@
can be no doubt that this is true) depends on our understanding, but
the Ideal can thereby determine in its totality metaphysics.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of the objects in space and time is a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of the objects in space and time is a
posteriori, general logic, in respect of the intelligible character,
is by its very nature contradictory. By means of analytic unity, it
is not at all certain that space, insomuch as our understanding relies
@@ -1424,7 +1415,7 @@
part of the sphere of our understanding concerning the existence of
the phenomena in general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Human reason (and we can deduce that this is true)
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Human reason (and we can deduce that this is true)
proves the validity of the architectonic of natural reason. To avoid
all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that the employment of
the things in themselves can not take account of the phenomena. The
@@ -1439,7 +1430,7 @@
ideas is a posteriori, the phenomena are a representation of the
phenomena.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Necessity, as I have elsewhere shown, is the mere
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Necessity, as I have elsewhere shown, is the mere
result of the power of the architectonic of practical reason, a blind
but indispensable function of the soul. The paralogisms of pure
reason are the clue to the discovery of the practical employment of
@@ -1454,7 +1445,7 @@
general logic, yet the objects in space and time are just as necessary
as the noumena. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, let us suppose that
+\__kgl_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, let us suppose that
the Categories exclude the possibility of the never-ending regress in
the series of empirical conditions. The manifold occupies part of the
sphere of the thing in itself concerning the existence of the things
@@ -1471,7 +1462,7 @@
Philosophy is the key to understanding, thus, our sense perceptions.
This is what chiefly concerns us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our understanding would thereby be made to contradict,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Our understanding would thereby be made to contradict,
so far as regards the Ideal, necessity. Our faculties, as I have
elsewhere shown, are the mere results of the power of time, a blind
but indispensable function of the soul. Time, with the sole exception
@@ -1488,7 +1479,7 @@
discovery of, in the study of the thing in itself, the discipline of
practical reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our a priori concepts, with the sole exception of our
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Our a priori concepts, with the sole exception of our
experience, have lying before them our judgements. It must not be
supposed that the Antinomies are a representation of the discipline of
human reason, by means of analytic unity. In the study of the
@@ -1515,7 +1506,7 @@
transcendental unity of apperception, they exclude the possibility of
hypothetical principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since none of our faculties are speculative, our ideas
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since none of our faculties are speculative, our ideas
should only be used as a canon for time. With the sole exception of
the manifold, our concepts exclude the possibility of the practical
employment of metaphysics, by means of analysis. Aristotle tells us
@@ -1534,7 +1525,7 @@
that, in other words, the manifold, that is to say, abstracts from all
content of knowledge.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, Aristotle
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, Aristotle
tells us that the transcendental unity of apperception can be treated
like the discipline of pure reason; in the case of our understanding,
our sense perceptions are just as necessary as the noumena. The
@@ -1550,7 +1541,7 @@
like the transcendental aesthetic, it has nothing to do with
ampliative principles. Transcendental logic exists in our faculties.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that the objects in space and
+\__kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that the objects in space and
time have nothing to do with our judgements. The architectonic of
human reason has nothing to do with the noumena. What we have alone
been able to show is that natural causes have nothing to do with,
@@ -1568,7 +1559,7 @@
remains a mystery why this is true) is the clue to the discovery of
our speculative judgements.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As I have elsewhere shown, the Ideal is a body of
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As I have elsewhere shown, the Ideal is a body of
demonstrated science, and some of it must be known a priori, as is
evident upon close examination. Our ideas abstract from all content
of knowledge, and the phenomena have nothing to do with, then,
@@ -1586,7 +1577,7 @@
practical reason, then, is what first gives rise to necessity; still,
our concepts stand in need to the objects in space and time.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that our sense perceptions are
+\__kgl_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that our sense perceptions are
the clue to the discovery of the Antinomies. As will easily be shown
in the next section, our experience, in particular, excludes the
possibility of natural causes, yet the architectonic of human reason
@@ -1605,7 +1596,7 @@
necessary interconnection that we have in mind when we speak of the
transcendental aesthetic. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, Aristotle tells us that, when
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, Aristotle tells us that, when
thus treated as the phenomena, the transcendental unity of
apperception can thereby determine in its totality the Ideal of human
reason. There can be no doubt that natural causes can not take
@@ -1623,7 +1614,7 @@
alone been able to show is that this is true) is the clue to the
discovery of the objects in space and time.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In the case of the Transcendental Deduction, our ideas
+\__kgl_newpara:n {In the case of the Transcendental Deduction, our ideas
would thereby be made to contradict, in natural theology, the objects
in space and time. In all theoretical sciences, it remains a mystery
why the employment of our understanding has nothing to do with the
@@ -1641,7 +1632,7 @@
of the Transcendental Deduction concerning the existence of the
intelligible objects in space and time in general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Still, time is by its very nature contradictory. The
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Still, time is by its very nature contradictory. The
paralogisms of practical reason constitute a body of demonstrated
doctrine, and none of this body must be known a priori; for these
reasons, the noumena are the mere results of the power of the
@@ -1656,7 +1647,7 @@
objects in space and time is a priori. The Categories are what first
give rise to the Transcendental Deduction.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our faculties, in the full sense of these terms, exist
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Our faculties, in the full sense of these terms, exist
in the noumena, because of the relation between space and the
phenomena. Because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions, the
paralogisms of practical reason are a representation of, indeed, our
@@ -1676,7 +1667,7 @@
knowledge, formal logic would thereby be made to contradict the
noumena.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since all of our a posteriori concepts are synthetic,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since all of our a posteriori concepts are synthetic,
applied logic has nothing to do with, for example, the noumena. With
the sole exception of philosophy, the Ideal of practical reason is
what first gives rise to our ideas, as is evident upon close
@@ -1698,7 +1689,7 @@
empirical objects in space and time, with the sole exception of
metaphysics, exist in the empirical objects in space and time. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {On the other hand, the reader should be careful to
+\__kgl_newpara:n {On the other hand, the reader should be careful to
observe that the Transcendental Deduction can never furnish a true and
demonstrated science, because, like our experience, it would thereby
be made to contradict synthetic principles. The pure employment of
@@ -1718,7 +1709,7 @@
system of transcendental philosophy, but in a merely critical essay
the simple mention of the fact may suffice.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our sense perceptions are just as necessary as the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Our sense perceptions are just as necessary as the
employment of the never-ending regress in the series of empirical
conditions, but our a priori concepts can never, as a whole, furnish a
true and demonstrated science, because, like necessity, they would
@@ -1736,7 +1727,7 @@
abstracts from all content of a priori knowledge. The paralogisms of
pure reason should only be used as a canon for time.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, I assert that the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, I assert that the
paralogisms, for example, would be falsified; however, our inductive
judgements constitute the whole content of the discipline of natural
reason. The noumena constitute the whole content of the noumena. The
@@ -1757,7 +1748,7 @@
from all content of knowledge; on the other hand, our faculties should
only be used as a canon for the pure employment of the Categories.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Aristotle tells us that our ideas have lying before
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Aristotle tells us that our ideas have lying before
them the phenomena. In the study of the employment of the objects in
space and time, it is not at all certain that the transcendental
aesthetic teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of, so
@@ -1776,7 +1767,7 @@
careful to observe that, indeed, the transcendental aesthetic, still,
exists in natural causes.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since none of the objects in space and time are
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since none of the objects in space and time are
analytic, it remains a mystery why, in the full sense of these terms,
the objects in space and time have lying before them the Categories,
and our ideas (and let us suppose that this is the case) have lying
@@ -1795,7 +1786,7 @@
be no doubt that the manifold, when thus treated as the things in
themselves, is by its very nature contradictory.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As I have elsewhere shown, the never-ending regress in
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As I have elsewhere shown, the never-ending regress in
the series of empirical conditions, in the study of the never-ending
regress in the series of empirical conditions, occupies part of the
sphere of the Transcendental Deduction concerning the existence of the
@@ -1812,7 +1803,7 @@
treated as the objects in space and time, constitutes the whole
content for the Ideal.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It is not at all certain that, so far as regards the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {It is not at all certain that, so far as regards the
manifold and our ideas, the Categories are just as necessary as, in
the study of the architectonic of pure reason, the discipline of human
reason. It must not be supposed that metaphysics is the mere result
@@ -1825,7 +1816,7 @@
show is that our judgements constitute the whole content of, on the
other hand, our inductive judgements, as we have already seen. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {The objects in space and time should only be used as a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The objects in space and time should only be used as a
canon for the phenomena. By means of analysis, to avoid all
misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that the noumena are just
as necessary as pure logic; however, natural causes exist in the Ideal
@@ -1844,7 +1835,7 @@
philosophy, it has lying before it speculative principles. This is
the sense in which it is to be understood in this work.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Still, the Ideal is what first gives rise to, when
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Still, the Ideal is what first gives rise to, when
thus treated as our ideas, the transcendental aesthetic. As any
dedicated reader can clearly see, it is obvious that natural causes
exclude the possibility of natural causes; therefore, metaphysics is a
@@ -1868,7 +1859,7 @@
manifold, time is the key to understanding space. By virtue of human
reason, our speculative judgements have nothing to do with the Ideal.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Transcendental logic constitutes the whole content
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Transcendental logic constitutes the whole content
for, for example, the never-ending regress in the series of empirical
conditions. It remains a mystery why, even as this relates to time,
the Ideal excludes the possibility of the Categories, but natural
@@ -1887,7 +1878,7 @@
like necessity; for these reasons, the noumena exclude the possibility
of the Ideal.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that our a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that our a
posteriori knowledge has lying before it the Categories, as is shown
in the writings of Galileo. Thus, the Categories are the mere results
of the power of space, a blind but indispensable function of the soul.
@@ -1906,7 +1897,7 @@
the validity of the things in themselves, and our sense perceptions
would thereby be made to contradict our understanding.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, Galileo tells
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, Galileo tells
us that natural causes, so far as regards necessity, can never, as a
whole, furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like the
manifold, they prove the validity of ampliative principles. Let us
@@ -1925,7 +1916,7 @@
natural reason, there can be no doubt that our understanding would be
falsified. This is what chiefly concerns us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between philosophy and the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between philosophy and the
objects in space and time, the Categories, in all theoretical
sciences, are by their very nature contradictory. What we have alone
been able to show is that our knowledge is a representation of the
@@ -1944,7 +1935,7 @@
considerations, is by its very nature contradictory. Let us apply
this to necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, our sense
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is proven in the ontological manuals, our sense
perceptions, as I have elsewhere shown, should only be used as a canon
for our ideas; in natural theology, the paralogisms, indeed, are by
their very nature contradictory. By virtue of practical reason, the
@@ -1962,7 +1953,7 @@
still, time, with the sole exception of our experience, can be treated
like our sense perceptions. This is what chiefly concerns us. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Categories, as I have elsewhere shown, constitute
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The Categories, as I have elsewhere shown, constitute
the whole content of necessity. The transcendental unity of
apperception is just as necessary as the transcendental objects in
space and time. Consequently, I assert that the thing in itself is a
@@ -1977,7 +1968,7 @@
possible that it may be in contradictions with the architectonic of
human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of the objects in space and time is a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of the objects in space and time is a
priori, it remains a mystery why, in reference to ends, the phenomena
prove the validity of the paralogisms. As is proven in the
ontological manuals, the empirical objects in space and time would
@@ -2003,7 +1994,7 @@
possibility of our ideas; thus, the objects in space and time, for
these reasons, are the clue to the discovery of the Antinomies.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {With the sole exception of the never-ending regress in
+\__kgl_newpara:n {With the sole exception of the never-ending regress in
the series of empirical conditions, it is not at all certain that the
noumena, in so far as this expounds the practical rules of the
paralogisms of pure reason, can never, as a whole, furnish a true and
@@ -2022,7 +2013,7 @@
all content of knowledge; in the study of the Ideal of practical
reason, our concepts are the clue to the discovery of our experience.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
Categories would be falsified. Consequently, there can be no doubt
that the noumena can not take account of, even as this relates to
philosophy, the Antinomies, as any dedicated reader can clearly see.
@@ -2041,7 +2032,7 @@
before them our faculties, and the architectonic of natural reason
stands in need of the things in themselves.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By means of analytic unity, the objects in space and
+\__kgl_newpara:n {By means of analytic unity, the objects in space and
time (and there can be no doubt that this is the case) constitute the
whole content of the Antinomies, but our ideas have lying before them
the noumena. The Ideal is the key to understanding, that is to say,
@@ -2058,7 +2049,7 @@
time have nothing to do with philosophy. The divisions are thus
provided; all that is required is to fill them.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, the noumena would
+\__kgl_newpara:n {In view of these considerations, the noumena would
thereby be made to contradict, in view of these considerations, the
paralogisms of natural reason. Because of the relation between the
discipline of pure reason and our sense perceptions, we can deduce
@@ -2075,7 +2066,7 @@
irrespective of all empirical conditions, is by its very nature
contradictory. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that natural
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that natural
causes (and to avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain
that this is the case) have lying before them necessity. We can
deduce that our a priori knowledge (and Galileo tells us that this is
@@ -2095,7 +2086,7 @@
is obvious that this is the case) are the clue to the discovery of the
paralogisms.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, it is not at
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As any dedicated reader can clearly see, it is not at
all certain that, on the contrary, the objects in space and time, in
the case of space, stand in need to the objects in space and time, but
the phenomena have lying before them the discipline of human reason.
@@ -2119,7 +2110,7 @@
Transcendental Deduction, a blind but indispensable function of the
soul. But this need not worry us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Aristotle tells us that, insomuch as the pure
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Aristotle tells us that, insomuch as the pure
employment of the Categories relies on our ideas, the things in
themselves are just as necessary as, in all theoretical sciences, the
noumena. Therefore, let us suppose that the phenomena occupy part of
@@ -2144,7 +2135,7 @@
still, the employment of the noumena is a representation of the
Ideal.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {We can deduce that the paralogisms of human reason are
+\__kgl_newpara:n {We can deduce that the paralogisms of human reason are
a representation of, in the full sense of these terms, our experience.
The thing in itself, in reference to ends, exists in our judgements.
As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, let us suppose that, in
@@ -2161,7 +2152,7 @@
content of knowledge, since knowledge of the objects in space and time
is a posteriori.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between practical reason and
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Because of the relation between practical reason and
our problematic judgements, what we have alone been able to show is
that, in respect of the intelligible character, our faculties,
insomuch as our knowledge relies on the Categories, can be treated
@@ -2181,7 +2172,7 @@
fallen short of the necessary interconnection that we have in mind
when we speak of necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It is not at all certain that space can not take
+\__kgl_newpara:n {It is not at all certain that space can not take
account of natural causes. The Transcendental Deduction can not take
account of our a priori knowledge; as I have elsewhere shown, the
objects in space and time (and let us suppose that this is the case)
@@ -2196,7 +2187,7 @@
reason, thus, abstract from all content of knowledge. This is not
something we are in a position to establish.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since none of our ideas are inductive, our ideas
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since none of our ideas are inductive, our ideas
constitute the whole content of the paralogisms; consequently, our
faculties can not take account of metaphysics. As will easily be
shown in the next section, the Ideal, in reference to ends, may not
@@ -2220,7 +2211,7 @@
soul, yet the objects in space and time, with the sole exception of
the manifold, exist in our ideas.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In natural theology, it must not be supposed that the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {In natural theology, it must not be supposed that the
objects in space and time, so far as regards the manifold, should only
be used as a canon for natural reason. The manifold, so far as
regards our a priori knowledge, teaches us nothing whatsoever
@@ -2239,7 +2230,7 @@
body of demonstrated doctrine, and some of this body must be known a
posteriori. And similarly with all the others.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our speculative judgements, therefore, prove the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Our speculative judgements, therefore, prove the
validity of the transcendental unity of apperception. Necessity is
just as necessary as, that is to say, transcendental logic. The
reader should be careful to observe that the noumena (and it must not
@@ -2253,7 +2244,7 @@
the paralogisms prove the validity of, as I have elsewhere shown, the
architectonic of pure reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Space may not contradict itself, but it is still
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Space may not contradict itself, but it is still
possible that it may be in contradictions with, for these reasons, the
phenomena; with the sole exception of metaphysics, our ideas exclude
the possibility of, in natural theology, the thing in itself. What we
@@ -2278,7 +2269,7 @@
short of the necessary interconnection that we have in mind when we
speak of necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The objects in space and time are the mere results of
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The objects in space and time are the mere results of
the power of metaphysics, a blind but indispensable function of the
soul; in the study of our a posteriori knowledge, the manifold, so far
as I know, proves the validity of the Ideal. Hume tells us that, so
@@ -2298,7 +2289,7 @@
conditions. But we have fallen short of the necessary interconnection
that we have in mind when we speak of the Categories.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions,
it is not at all certain that, for example, the thing in itself (and
the reader should be careful to observe that this is true) can not
take account of our experience, and our concepts, in all theoretical
@@ -2310,7 +2301,7 @@
understanding can be treated like the transcendental unity of
apperception. The Categories can be treated like space.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since some of our sense perceptions are hypothetical,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since some of our sense perceptions are hypothetical,
philosophy proves the validity of natural causes; on the other hand,
our experience, in other words, can never furnish a true and
demonstrated science, because, like our experience, it depends on
@@ -2328,7 +2319,7 @@
view of these considerations, are by their very nature contradictory,
as will easily be shown in the next section.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {On the other hand, the never-ending regress in the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {On the other hand, the never-ending regress in the
series of empirical conditions stands in need of practical reason. As
will easily be shown in the next section, there can be no doubt that,
in so far as this expounds the contradictory rules of the discipline
@@ -2342,7 +2333,7 @@
show is that natural causes, in reference to ends, would be falsified.
But this need not worry us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since some of the objects in space and time are
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since some of the objects in space and time are
speculative, let us suppose that our sense perceptions are the clue to
the discovery of, in particular, our a posteriori knowledge. Since
knowledge of the transcendental objects in space and time is a
@@ -2364,7 +2355,7 @@
space and time, and space is the clue to the discovery of, in
particular, our a posteriori concepts. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Ideal of human reason has nothing to do with time.
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The Ideal of human reason has nothing to do with time.
As we have already seen, Aristotle tells us that, so far as regards
the Transcendental Deduction, the transcendental aesthetic, insomuch
as the practical employment of the never-ending regress in the series
@@ -2383,7 +2374,7 @@
teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of, consequently,
the Antinomies, because of our necessary ignorance of the conditions.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since all of our concepts are inductive, there can be
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since all of our concepts are inductive, there can be
no doubt that, in respect of the intelligible character, our ideas are
the clue to the discovery of the transcendental unity of apperception,
and the paralogisms of natural reason should only be used as a canon
@@ -2402,7 +2393,7 @@
posteriori concepts is what first gives rise to, in all theoretical
sciences, the noumena.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of natural causes is a posteriori, it
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since knowledge of natural causes is a posteriori, it
is obvious that the transcendental unity of apperception is the mere
result of the power of the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions, a blind but indispensable function of the soul;
@@ -2419,7 +2410,7 @@
in itself, occupy part of the sphere of the Transcendental Deduction
concerning the existence of the Categories in general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, it is not at all certain
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, it is not at all certain
that, that is to say, the Transcendental Deduction is the clue to the
discovery of, in particular, our knowledge, yet the thing in itself
would thereby be made to contradict our faculties. As is proven in
@@ -2438,7 +2429,7 @@
Categories, certainly, should only be used as a canon for the thing in
itself. This is not something we are in a position to establish.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It is obvious that space depends on the things in
+\__kgl_newpara:n {It is obvious that space depends on the things in
themselves. There can be no doubt that, in particular, the Ideal, in
so far as this expounds the practical rules of the phenomena, is just
as necessary as the transcendental unity of apperception. There can
@@ -2449,7 +2440,7 @@
understanding (and to avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to
explain that this is true) is a representation of the Antinomies.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, the Antinomies are a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of natural reason, the Antinomies are a
representation of metaphysics; in the case of the practical employment
of the transcendental aesthetic, the Categories are by their very
nature contradictory. It is not at all certain that the phenomena
@@ -2467,7 +2458,7 @@
that metaphysics is a representation of the transcendental unity of
apperception, as any dedicated reader can clearly see.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that our concepts, in accordance
+\__kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that our concepts, in accordance
with the principles of the noumena, are by their very nature
contradictory, as is shown in the writings of Galileo. Space is what
first gives rise to, in other words, the Antinomies, and space depends
@@ -2482,7 +2473,7 @@
in itself concerning the existence of our synthetic judgements in
general.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, I assert that,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, I assert that,
so far as regards metaphysics, our knowledge proves the validity of,
on the contrary, the manifold, yet the objects in space and time are
what first give rise to, in the study of formal logic, the paralogisms
@@ -2499,7 +2490,7 @@
themselves, since knowledge of our faculties is a priori. But this is
to be dismissed as random groping.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Our understanding can not take account of our
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Our understanding can not take account of our
faculties; certainly, the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions is what first gives rise to, therefore, the
things in themselves. It is not at all certain that, then, time
@@ -2516,7 +2507,7 @@
contradict the things in themselves, as any dedicated reader can
clearly see.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves are just as necessary as the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves are just as necessary as the
never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions. As any
dedicated reader can clearly see, the architectonic of natural reason
(and it remains a mystery why this is true) can thereby determine in
@@ -2534,7 +2525,7 @@
manifold stands in need of, for these reasons, the Antinomies, by
virtue of human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of practical reason, there can be no doubt
+\__kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of practical reason, there can be no doubt
that our experience, still, occupies part of the sphere of the
manifold concerning the existence of our analytic judgements in
general; as I have elsewhere shown, the Categories can never, as a
@@ -2559,7 +2550,7 @@
some of it must be known a priori. This may be clear with an
example.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The transcendental unity of apperception, so far as
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The transcendental unity of apperception, so far as
regards the Ideal of practical reason and the noumena, abstracts from
all content of a posteriori knowledge, by virtue of human reason. To
avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain that, that is to
@@ -2580,7 +2571,7 @@
to do with hypothetical principles. Our ideas have nothing to do with
the transcendental aesthetic.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {In the case of philosophy, the Transcendental
+\__kgl_newpara:n {In the case of philosophy, the Transcendental
Deduction proves the validity of necessity, by means of analysis. Our
sense perceptions have lying before them, certainly, our experience.
There can be no doubt that space (and it remains a mystery why this is
@@ -2594,7 +2585,7 @@
ideas, yet the things in themselves, in natural theology, can be
treated like the transcendental aesthetic.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Galileo, it remains a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Galileo, it remains a
mystery why, so far as I know, the phenomena are the mere results of
the power of the Ideal of pure reason, a blind but indispensable
function of the soul, but the paralogisms (and there can be no doubt
@@ -2619,7 +2610,7 @@
made to contradict the transcendental unity of apperception. But the
proof of this is a task from which we can here be absolved. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Hume, the noumena
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Hume, the noumena
should only be used as a canon for the Categories. As is proven in
the ontological manuals, our sense perceptions, consequently, are by
their very nature contradictory; therefore, our experience (and it
@@ -2634,7 +2625,7 @@
the other hand, the Ideal of natural reason (and there can be no doubt
that this is true) is a representation of the manifold.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {I assert, certainly, that, irrespective of all
+\__kgl_newpara:n {I assert, certainly, that, irrespective of all
empirical conditions, the Categories are just as necessary as, on the
other hand, the thing in itself, yet the manifold proves the validity
of, on the other hand, the employment of the transcendental unity of
@@ -2649,7 +2640,7 @@
paralogisms of natural reason, when thus treated as our ideas, can be
treated like philosophy.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, our faculties
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, our faculties
stand in need to the transcendental objects in space and time;
certainly, our ideas are a representation of the objects in space and
time. The reader should be careful to observe that the Categories
@@ -2664,7 +2655,7 @@
noumena and the things in themselves? The employment of the
Antinomies is the key to understanding our ideas.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that the
employment of the transcendental aesthetic, still, exists in our sense
perceptions; as I have elsewhere shown, the phenomena exist in the
discipline of practical reason. Necessity (and Aristotle tells us
@@ -2686,7 +2677,7 @@
know, can not take account of our sense perceptions. Let us suppose
that our ideas are a representation of metaphysics.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of human reason, the Ideal of pure reason,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {By virtue of human reason, the Ideal of pure reason,
in the full sense of these terms, is by its very nature contradictory,
yet necessity is the key to understanding metaphysics. The Categories
have nothing to do with, therefore, the phenomena. We can deduce that
@@ -2699,7 +2690,7 @@
of human reason are the clue to the discovery of, on the contrary, our
understanding.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that, in reference to ends, the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {There can be no doubt that, in reference to ends, the
thing in itself excludes the possibility of the objects in space and
time, but the discipline of human reason is by its very nature
contradictory. It is obvious that, in other words, the manifold, in
@@ -2710,7 +2701,7 @@
Metaphysics exists in our speculative judgements. By means of
analysis, the phenomena are a representation of our faculties.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The phenomena stand in need to our sense perceptions,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The phenomena stand in need to our sense perceptions,
but our concepts are the clue to the discovery of formal logic. The
objects in space and time have nothing to do with the things in
themselves, as is evident upon close examination. Time teaches us
@@ -2726,7 +2717,7 @@
priori concepts, on the other hand, are what first give rise to the
Ideal of human reason, as any dedicated reader can clearly see.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that, then,
+\__kgl_newpara:n {What we have alone been able to show is that, then,
the Ideal of human reason, in reference to ends, is the mere result of
the power of practical reason, a blind but indispensable function of
the soul, but the Ideal (and the reader should be careful to observe
@@ -2750,7 +2741,7 @@
before them the employment of necessity, by means of analytic unity.
}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As will easily be shown in the next section, it is not
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As will easily be shown in the next section, it is not
at all certain that the transcendental unity of apperception is the
key to understanding the things in themselves; certainly, the
Categories prove the validity of our faculties. Let us suppose that
@@ -2766,7 +2757,7 @@
as I have elsewhere shown, the Categories. The question of this
matter's relation to objects is not in any way under discussion.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that, so regarded, our
+\__kgl_newpara:n {It must not be supposed that, so regarded, our
experience, in particular, can thereby determine in its totality our
analytic judgements, yet necessity has nothing to do with, in
reference to ends, the discipline of human reason. It is not at all
@@ -2790,7 +2781,7 @@
the series of empirical conditions only in so far as it is founded on
hypothetical principles.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves prove the validity of, on the
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The things in themselves prove the validity of, on the
other hand, transcendental logic; therefore, necessity has lying
before it, indeed, the paralogisms. What we have alone been able to
show is that our ideas constitute a body of demonstrated doctrine, and
@@ -2803,7 +2794,7 @@
and time, that is to say, has lying before it the things in
themselves. Natural causes prove the validity of necessity.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that our a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The reader should be careful to observe that our a
priori concepts, in other words, can never, as a whole, furnish a true
and demonstrated science, because, like general logic, they prove the
validity of hypothetical principles, by virtue of human reason. There
@@ -2818,7 +2809,7 @@
in space and time, but the Ideal, indeed, is the key to understanding
our understanding.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, it is not at all certain that
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As we have already seen, it is not at all certain that
the Ideal of pure reason is just as necessary as natural causes; in
the case of the Transcendental Deduction, our faculties, in natural
theology, abstract from all content of knowledge. The Categories can
@@ -2833,7 +2824,7 @@
reason, so far as I know, would be falsified, because of our necessary
ignorance of the conditions. Our faculties would be falsified.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The Ideal proves the validity of the objects in space
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The Ideal proves the validity of the objects in space
and time. To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain
that our judgements are a representation of, however, the manifold.
The objects in space and time exclude the possibility of necessity.
@@ -2842,7 +2833,7 @@
indeed, the objects in space and time would thereby be made to
contradict human reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {It is obvious that the transcendental unity of
+\__kgl_newpara:n {It is obvious that the transcendental unity of
apperception can be treated like the Ideal. I assert that applied
logic (and it is not at all certain that this is true) stands in need
of the objects in space and time; certainly, the Ideal of practical
@@ -2862,7 +2853,7 @@
experience is what first gives rise to the architectonic of practical
reason. This may be clear with an example. }
-\kgl_newpara:n {I assert, consequently, that the Transcendental
+\__kgl_newpara:n {I assert, consequently, that the Transcendental
Deduction would thereby be made to contradict our faculties, as will
easily be shown in the next section. Let us suppose that our ideas,
in the full sense of these terms, occupy part of the sphere of formal
@@ -2885,7 +2876,7 @@
teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of, then, the
Ideal of pure reason.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, the things in
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is evident upon close examination, the things in
themselves are the clue to the discovery of the phenomena, and
philosophy (and what we have alone been able to show is that this is
true) teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of the
@@ -2901,7 +2892,7 @@
Ideal of human reason, as we have already seen. The noumena prove the
validity of, in the study of transcendental logic, our understanding.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Space (and what we have alone been able to show is
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Space (and what we have alone been able to show is
that this is true) stands in need of necessity, yet our understanding,
so far as regards the Ideal of practical reason, can never furnish a
true and demonstrated science, because, like the transcendental unity
@@ -2925,7 +2916,7 @@
the pure employment of the discipline of natural reason has lying
before it our experience.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Still, it must not be supposed that our faculties are
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Still, it must not be supposed that our faculties are
a representation of the Ideal of practical reason, as is evident upon
close examination. As is proven in the ontological manuals, the
reader should be careful to observe that the objects in space and time
@@ -2946,7 +2937,7 @@
it is not at all certain that this is the case) are the clue to the
discovery of our concepts. But this need not worry us.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {The architectonic of natural reason is the key to
+\__kgl_newpara:n {The architectonic of natural reason is the key to
understanding, so far as regards our a posteriori knowledge and the
paralogisms, time; still, the Categories, with the sole exception of
the never-ending regress in the series of empirical conditions, should
@@ -2964,7 +2955,7 @@
nothing to do with the objects in space and time. We thus have a pure
synthesis of apprehension.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Since none of the noumena are hypothetical, there can
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Since none of the noumena are hypothetical, there can
be no doubt that, in particular, our knowledge, in other words, is the
clue to the discovery of the things in themselves. Therefore, the
Ideal is just as necessary as, then, the Ideal, as will easily be
@@ -2978,7 +2969,7 @@
transcendental logic, constitute the whole content of the things in
themselves, as any dedicated reader can clearly see.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Transcendental logic can thereby determine in its
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Transcendental logic can thereby determine in its
totality, consequently, our faculties, because of our necessary
ignorance of the conditions. Since some of the paralogisms are
analytic, there can be no doubt that, in reference to ends, the
@@ -2997,7 +2988,7 @@
Our understanding is a representation of the objects in space and
time, and the paralogisms are just as necessary as our experience.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {Philosophy (and it must not be supposed that this is
+\__kgl_newpara:n {Philosophy (and it must not be supposed that this is
true) is a representation of the never-ending regress in the series of
empirical conditions; however, the Antinomies have nothing to do with,
in the study of philosophy, the discipline of practical reason.
@@ -3018,7 +3009,7 @@
human reason relies on the Antinomies, can thereby determine in its
totality natural causes.}
-\kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Hume, it remains a
+\__kgl_newpara:n {As is shown in the writings of Hume, it remains a
mystery why our judgements exclude the possibility of the
transcendental aesthetic; therefore, the transcendental aesthetic can
not take account of the thing in itself. Our knowledge depends on,
@@ -3033,173 +3024,185 @@
and time; still, the noumena, in the case of necessity, constitute the
whole content of philosophy.}
-\kgl_newword:n {Ideal}
-\kgl_newword:n {noumena}
-\kgl_newword:n {Aristotle}
-\kgl_newword:n {transcendental}
-\kgl_newword:n {metaphysics}
-\kgl_newword:n {reason}
-\kgl_newword:n {science}
-\kgl_newword:n {necessity}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {philosophy}
-\kgl_newword:n {knowledge}
-\kgl_newword:n {regress}
-\kgl_newword:n {paralogism}
-\kgl_newword:n {empirical}
-\kgl_newword:n {space}
-\kgl_newword:n {manifold}
-\kgl_newword:n {understanding}
-\kgl_newword:n {aesthetic}
-\kgl_newword:n {noumena}
-\kgl_newword:n {sphere}
-\kgl_newword:n {time}
-\kgl_newword:n {practical reason}
-\kgl_newword:n {perception}
-\kgl_newword:n {things in themselves}
-\kgl_newword:n {doctrine}
-\kgl_newword:n {regress}
-\kgl_newword:n {mystery}
-\kgl_newword:n {existence}
-\kgl_newword:n {contradiction}
-\kgl_newword:n {a priori}
-\kgl_newword:n {natural causes}
-\kgl_newword:n {analysis}
-\kgl_newword:n {apperception}
-\kgl_newword:n {Antinomies}
-\kgl_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
-\kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
-\kgl_newword:n {formal logic}
-\kgl_newword:n {soul}
-\kgl_newword:n {misapprehension}
-\kgl_newword:n {elsewhere}
-\kgl_newword:n {theology}
-\kgl_newword:n {employment}
-\kgl_newword:n {logic}
-\kgl_newword:n {practical reason}
-\kgl_newword:n {theoretical sciences}
-\kgl_newword:n {a posteriori}
-\kgl_newword:n {mystery}
-\kgl_newword:n {philosophy}
-\kgl_newword:n {things in themselves}
-\kgl_newword:n {experience}
-\kgl_newword:n {contradictory}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {perceptions}
-\kgl_newword:n {Galileo}
-\kgl_newword:n {apperception}
-\kgl_newword:n {empirical objects}
-\kgl_newword:n {judgements}
-\kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
-\kgl_newword:n {power}
-\kgl_newword:n {hypothetical principles}
-\kgl_newword:n {transcendental logic}
-\kgl_newword:n {doctrine}
-\kgl_newword:n {understanding}
-\kgl_newword:n {totality}
-\kgl_newword:n {manifold}
-\kgl_newword:n {inductive judgements}
-\kgl_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
-\kgl_newword:n {analytic unity}
-\kgl_newword:n {Hume}
-\kgl_newword:n {canon}
-\kgl_newword:n {knowledge}
-\kgl_newword:n {universal}
-\kgl_newword:n {section}
-\kgl_newword:n {body}
-\kgl_newword:n {ignorance}
-\kgl_newword:n {sense perceptions}
-\kgl_newword:n {natural reason}
-\kgl_newword:n {exception}
-\kgl_newword:n {ampliative judgements}
-\kgl_newword:n {experience}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {analysis}
-\kgl_newword:n {philosophy}
-\kgl_newword:n {apperception}
-\kgl_newword:n {paralogism}
-\kgl_newword:n {ignorance}
-\kgl_newword:n {true}
-\kgl_newword:n {space}
-\kgl_newword:n {Ideal}
-\kgl_newword:n {accordance}
-\kgl_newword:n {regress}
-\kgl_newword:n {experience}
-\kgl_newword:n {a priori}
-\kgl_newword:n {disjunctive}
-\kgl_newword:n {soul}
-\kgl_newword:n {understanding}
-\kgl_newword:n {analytic unity}
-\kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
-\kgl_newword:n {practical reason}
-\kgl_newword:n {cause}
-\kgl_newword:n {manuals}
-\kgl_newword:n {dedicated reader}
-\kgl_newword:n {a posteriori}
-\kgl_newword:n {employment}
-\kgl_newword:n {natural theology}
-\kgl_newword:n {manifold}
-\kgl_newword:n {transcendental aesthetic}
-\kgl_newword:n {close}
-\kgl_newword:n {full}
-\kgl_newword:n {Aristotle}
-\kgl_newword:n {clue}
-\kgl_newword:n {me}
-\kgl_newword:n {account}
-\kgl_newword:n {things}
-\kgl_newword:n {sense}
-\kgl_newword:n {intelligible}
-\kgl_newword:n {understanding}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {never}
-\kgl_newword:n {apperception}
-\kgl_newword:n {Ideal}
-\kgl_newword:n {need}
-\kgl_newword:n {space}
-\kgl_newword:n {virtue}
-\kgl_newword:n {Hume}
-\kgl_newword:n {still}
-\kgl_newword:n {whatsoever}
-\kgl_newword:n {even}
-\kgl_newword:n {sphere}
-\kgl_newword:n {position}
-\kgl_newword:n {ignorance}
-\kgl_newword:n {word}
-\kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
-\kgl_newword:n {theology}
-\kgl_newword:n {mystery}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {perception}
-\kgl_newword:n {power}
-\kgl_newword:n {experience}
-\kgl_newword:n {never-ending}
-\kgl_newword:n {analytic}
-\kgl_newword:n {itself}
-\kgl_newword:n {a priori}
-\kgl_newword:n {rule}
-\kgl_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
-\kgl_newword:n {empirical conditions}
-\kgl_newword:n {knowledge}
-\kgl_newword:n {disjunctive}
-\kgl_newword:n {transcendental}
-\kgl_newword:n {science}
-\kgl_newword:n {falsified}
-\kgl_newword:n {reader}
-\kgl_newword:n {blind}
-\kgl_newword:n {employment}
-\kgl_newword:n {discipline}
-\kgl_newword:n {function}
-\kgl_newword:n {careful}
-\kgl_newword:n {Aristotle}
-\kgl_newword:n {Categories}
-\kgl_newword:n {part}
-\kgl_newword:n {noumena}
-\kgl_newword:n {doubt}
-\kgl_newword:n {duck}
-\kgl_newword:n {Kant}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Ideal}
+\__kgl_newword:n {noumena}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Aristotle}
+\__kgl_newword:n {transcendental}
+\__kgl_newword:n {metaphysics}
+\__kgl_newword:n {reason}
+\__kgl_newword:n {science}
+\__kgl_newword:n {necessity}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Categories}
+\__kgl_newword:n {philosophy}
+\__kgl_newword:n {knowledge}
+\__kgl_newword:n {regress}
+\__kgl_newword:n {paralogism}
+\__kgl_newword:n {empirical}
+\__kgl_newword:n {space}
+\__kgl_newword:n {manifold}
+\__kgl_newword:n {understanding}
+\__kgl_newword:n {aesthetic}
+\__kgl_newword:n {noumena}
+\__kgl_newword:n {sphere}
+\__kgl_newword:n {time}
+\__kgl_newword:n {practical reason}
+\__kgl_newword:n {perception}
+\__kgl_newword:n {things in themselves}
+\__kgl_newword:n {doctrine}
+\__kgl_newword:n {regress}
+\__kgl_newword:n {mystery}
+\__kgl_newword:n {existence}
+\__kgl_newword:n {contradiction}
+\__kgl_newword:n {a priori}
+\__kgl_newword:n {natural causes}
+\__kgl_newword:n {analysis}
+\__kgl_newword:n {apperception}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Antinomies}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
+\__kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
+\__kgl_newword:n {formal logic}
+\__kgl_newword:n {soul}
+\__kgl_newword:n {misapprehension}
+\__kgl_newword:n {elsewhere}
+\__kgl_newword:n {theology}
+\__kgl_newword:n {employment}
+\__kgl_newword:n {logic}
+\__kgl_newword:n {practical reason}
+\__kgl_newword:n {theoretical sciences}
+\__kgl_newword:n {a posteriori}
+\__kgl_newword:n {mystery}
+\__kgl_newword:n {philosophy}
+\__kgl_newword:n {things in themselves}
+\__kgl_newword:n {experience}
+\__kgl_newword:n {contradictory}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Categories}
+\__kgl_newword:n {perceptions}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Galileo}
+\__kgl_newword:n {apperception}
+\__kgl_newword:n {empirical objects}
+\__kgl_newword:n {judgements}
+\__kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
+\__kgl_newword:n {power}
+\__kgl_newword:n {hypothetical principles}
+\__kgl_newword:n {transcendental logic}
+\__kgl_newword:n {doctrine}
+\__kgl_newword:n {understanding}
+\__kgl_newword:n {totality}
+\__kgl_newword:n {manifold}
+\__kgl_newword:n {inductive judgements}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
+\__kgl_newword:n {analytic unity}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Hume}
+\__kgl_newword:n {canon}
+\__kgl_newword:n {knowledge}
+\__kgl_newword:n {universal}
+\__kgl_newword:n {section}
+\__kgl_newword:n {body}
+\__kgl_newword:n {ignorance}
+\__kgl_newword:n {sense perceptions}
+\__kgl_newword:n {natural reason}
+\__kgl_newword:n {exception}
+\__kgl_newword:n {ampliative judgements}
+\__kgl_newword:n {experience}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Categories}
+\__kgl_newword:n {analysis}
+\__kgl_newword:n {philosophy}
+\__kgl_newword:n {apperception}
+\__kgl_newword:n {paralogism}
+\__kgl_newword:n {ignorance}
+\__kgl_newword:n {true}
+\__kgl_newword:n {space}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Ideal}
+\__kgl_newword:n {accordance}
+\__kgl_newword:n {regress}
+\__kgl_newword:n {experience}
+\__kgl_newword:n {a priori}
+\__kgl_newword:n {disjunctive}
+\__kgl_newword:n {soul}
+\__kgl_newword:n {understanding}
+\__kgl_newword:n {analytic unity}
+\__kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
+\__kgl_newword:n {practical reason}
+\__kgl_newword:n {cause}
+\__kgl_newword:n {manuals}
+\__kgl_newword:n {dedicated reader}
+\__kgl_newword:n {a posteriori}
+\__kgl_newword:n {employment}
+\__kgl_newword:n {natural theology}
+\__kgl_newword:n {manifold}
+\__kgl_newword:n {transcendental aesthetic}
+\__kgl_newword:n {close}
+\__kgl_newword:n {full}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Aristotle}
+\__kgl_newword:n {clue}
+\__kgl_newword:n {me}
+\__kgl_newword:n {account}
+\__kgl_newword:n {things}
+\__kgl_newword:n {sense}
+\__kgl_newword:n {intelligible}
+\__kgl_newword:n {understanding}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Categories}
+\__kgl_newword:n {never}
+\__kgl_newword:n {apperception}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Ideal}
+\__kgl_newword:n {need}
+\__kgl_newword:n {space}
+\__kgl_newword:n {virtue}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Hume}
+\__kgl_newword:n {still}
+\__kgl_newword:n {whatsoever}
+\__kgl_newword:n {even}
+\__kgl_newword:n {sphere}
+\__kgl_newword:n {position}
+\__kgl_newword:n {ignorance}
+\__kgl_newword:n {word}
+\__kgl_newword:n {phenomena}
+\__kgl_newword:n {theology}
+\__kgl_newword:n {mystery}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Categories}
+\__kgl_newword:n {perception}
+\__kgl_newword:n {power}
+\__kgl_newword:n {experience}
+\__kgl_newword:n {never-ending}
+\__kgl_newword:n {analytic}
+\__kgl_newword:n {itself}
+\__kgl_newword:n {a priori}
+\__kgl_newword:n {rule}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Transcendental Deduction}
+\__kgl_newword:n {empirical conditions}
+\__kgl_newword:n {knowledge}
+\__kgl_newword:n {disjunctive}
+\__kgl_newword:n {transcendental}
+\__kgl_newword:n {science}
+\__kgl_newword:n {falsified}
+\__kgl_newword:n {reader}
+\__kgl_newword:n {blind}
+\__kgl_newword:n {employment}
+\__kgl_newword:n {discipline}
+\__kgl_newword:n {function}
+\__kgl_newword:n {careful}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Aristotle}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Categories}
+\__kgl_newword:n {part}
+\__kgl_newword:n {noumena}
+\__kgl_newword:n {doubt}
+\__kgl_newword:n {duck}
+\__kgl_newword:n {Kant}
\group_end:
\msg_info:nnx {kantlipsum} {how-many}
- { \int_eval:n {\seq_count:N \g_kgl_pars_seq} }
+ { \int_eval:n {\seq_count:N \g__kgl_pars_seq} }
+%% Copyright (C) 2011-2017 by
+%% Enrico Gregorio
+%% enrico DOT gregorio AT univr DOT it
%%
+%% It may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the
+%% LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL), either version 1.3c of this
+%% license or (at your option) any later version. The latest version
+%% of this license is in the file
+%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
+%% This work consists of the file kantlipsum.dtx
+%% and the derived files kantlipsum.pdf,
+%% kantlipsum.sty and
+%% kantlipsum.ins.
%%
%% End of file `kantlipsum.sty'.
More information about the tex-live-commits
mailing list