[tex-k] [tex-live] xdvi problems with empty glyph

Philip TAYLOR P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk
Tue Oct 10 09:41:57 CEST 2006

Stefan Ulrich wrote:

> OK, I thought "replaced by" and "replaced with" are more or less
> equivalent, but perhaps this reads better.

The original read "replacing" (present continuous) and
the proposal was for "replaced" (past).  I don't think
whether "by" or "with" really matters in this context.

Philip Taylor

More information about the tex-k mailing list