[tex-k] Re: dvips documentation is old [with patch]

Karl Berry karl at freefriends.org
Fri May 28 15:24:40 CEST 2004

    only a reference to the documentation of those [EPSF]
    packages kept in the dvips documentation.

The difference is that epsf.sty has no other documentation.
What's in the dvips manual is it.  

Anyway, it's not important.  As I said, I see no harm in mentioning
\includegraphics, since you went to the trouble of writing it.  I agree
that only mentioning epsf is rather misleading.

More information about the tex-k mailing list