[tex-hyphen] updating the license of language patterns

[Georgi Boshnakov]

Dear Arthur,

Thanks for the quick reply. Keeping LPPL is fine, I was about to ask for it but thought that you would know better. 

And thanks for the LibreOffice remark. I know that they have different patterns but have not looked into it. 
Maybe it is time to do it. 

Best,
Georgi


-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Reutenauer [mailto:arthur.reutenauer at normalesup.org] 
Sent: 19 April 2016 15:08
To: Georgi Boshnakov
Cc: Mojca Miklavec; About TeX hyphenation patterns.
Subject: Re: [tex-hyphen] updating the license of language patterns

	Dear Georgi,

  Many thanks for your assent.  I've just updated the file, see

	http://tug.org/svn/texhyphen/trunk/hyph-utf8/tex/generic/hyph-utf8/patterns/tex/hyph-bg.tex?revision=748&view=markup

  Note I've marked the file as available under either the LPPL or the MIT licence because we're trying to keep track of the different licences covering a file; sadly, we're having these licence discussions regularly and we find it better to explicit list the licences.

  I also noticed that LibreOffice has a different hyphenation pattern file for Bulgarian, for which you're not credited, but that contains a number of patterns that look suspiciously like yours.  Would you be interested in investigating what the differences are?  The file is at

	https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/dictionaries/tree/bg_BG/hyph_bg_BG.dic

  Best,

	Arthur