[pstricks] A badly posed question concerning pst3d-solides

Herbert Voss Herbert.Voss at FU-Berlin.DE
Tue Aug 3 18:00:13 CEST 2010

Am 03.08.2010 16:33, schrieb Zbigniew Nitecki:
> Below I will copy some code, which on its own (inside a minimal example) creates 
> a perfectly good picture.  However, when I incorporate it into a larger, book-length
> document (which would be way too huge to attach here), it prints fine, except for all
> the \psPoints and related \uputs.  I have not noticed this problem with other diagrams.
> Can anyone speculate as to what might cause this, and how to work around it?

such code snippets are senseless, because we do not
have the definition of \fofxyz. Please provide
_always_ working examples. Then you'd realized that
the definition was missing.

When delete the backslash from \fofxyz I get the
attached picture.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: x.png
Type: image/png
Size: 47819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/pstricks/attachments/20100803/e0cb8441/attachment-0001.png>

More information about the PSTricks mailing list