[pstricks] What is wrong here?

[Zbigniew Nitecki]

Thanks, this cleared the problem.

A simple follow-up question (actually two):
The example is drawn from a book-length project, and the master file for this 
also called (originally) the packages pst-node, pst-text, [monochrome]pstcol.
Is loading those after the list you gave OK?

Also, the original called the package pst-3d.  Am I right that this is redundant---
that is, this is automatically called up by one or more of the other packages?
And if not, where in the sequence should it go?

Zbigniew Nitecki
Department of Mathematics
Tufts University
Medford, MA 02155

telephones:
Office    (617)627-3843
Dept.    (617)627-3234
Dept. fax    (617)627-3966
http://www.tufts.edu/~znitecki/

On May 1, 2010, at 2:54, Herbert Voss wrote:

> Am 01.05.2010 08:24, schrieb Herbert Voss:
>> Am 30.04.2010 20:30, schrieb Zbigniew Nitecki:
>>> I'm attaching a file and an output picture. Briefly, here is the code:
>> 
>>> Note the following features: the first multido draws gray arrows, whose starting 
>>> points should lie on the dashed given by the last parametricplot.
>>> 
>>> I don't see any difference between the coding of the curve and of the starting 
>>> points (other than \rt in place of u). Yet look where the arrow start.
>>> 
>>> What have I done wrong?
>> 
>> do not load pst-solides3d together with pst3dplot!
>> There are some negative interaction between these packages.
> 
> this order of loading packages should work:
> 
> \usepackage{pst-plot, pst-math}
> \usepackage{pst-solides3d}
> \usepackage{pst-3dplot, pst-func}
> \usepackage{pst-grad}
> \usepackage{pstricks-add}
> 
> Herbert
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PSTricks mailing list
> PSTricks at tug.org
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/pstricks
> archive: http://www.tug.org/pipermail/pstricks/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/pstricks/attachments/20100501/891852e0/attachment.html>