[pstricks] psplot, parametricplot, FPset and FPupn

[Herbert Voss]

Juergen Rose wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 19.07.2006, 19:45 +0200 schrieb Herbert Voss:
> 
>>Juergen Rose wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Now latex does not complain. But in the resulting table in bsp00.dvi and
>>>bsp00.ps all colors are black in contrast to page 321 of PSTRICKS27.pdf.
>>>And the table header is also not OK, cf. attachment. 
>>
>>PSTricks->PostScriptTricks, not DVI-Tricks ...
> 
> 
> But also bsp00.ps had only black rectangles. But now I find in bsp00.dvi
> und bsp00.ps the correct colors.
> 
> 
>>>bsp23.tex works now, the colors are also OK. But I still have problems
>>>with:
>>>- bsp15.tex       xkeyval Error: `xyLabel' undefined in families 
>>>- bsp24.tex       xkeyval Error: `xLabel' undefined in families
>>>`,pstricks-add
>>>- bsp60.tex       Undefined control sequence \figcaption
>>>- bsp68.tex       Undefined color `PineGreen'.
>>>- bsp71.tex       Undefined color `Goldenrod
>>>- bsp106.tex      xkeyval Error: `xyLabel' undefined in families
>>>- bsp107.tex      xkeyval Error: `treefit' undefined in families 
>>>- bsp115.tex      LaTeX Error: File `nonfloat.sty' not found.
>>>- bsp360.tex      Graphics parameter `' not defined
>>
>>I suppose that you have the old examples. Compare
>>with the ones in
>>http://tug.org/PSTricks/main.cgi?dir=Examples/Buch
> 
> 
> I got the new examples from
> http://tug.org/PSTricks/main.cgi?dir=Examples/Buch
> 
> I helped for several examples, but four problems remain:
> 
> bsp24.tex is unchanged, I still get "xLabel' undefined",

corrected

> bsp359.tex fails with:

no problem here

> bsp360.tex fails with:

also no problem

  *File List*
  article.cls    2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class
   size12.clo    2005/09/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX file (size option)
pstricks.sty    2006/01/01 v0.32 LaTeX wrapper for `PSTricks' (RN,HV)
pstricks.tex    2006/04/29 v1.14c `PSTricks' (tvz)
pstricks.pro
   xcolor.sty    2005/12/21 v2.09 LaTeX color extensions (UK)
    color.cfg    2001/08/31 v1.1 color configuration of teTeX/TeXLive
    dvips.def    1999/02/16 v3.0i Driver-dependant file (DPC,SPQR)
pst-plot.sty    2004/07/15 package wrapper for pst-plot.tex
pst-plot.tex    1999/12/12 97 patch 2 `pst-plot' (tvz)
   pst-3d.sty    2005/09/02 package wrapper for pst-3d.tex (hv)
   pst-3d.tex    2005/09/03 v1.00 `PST-3d' (hv)
pst-xkey.tex    2005/02/22 v1.5 PSTricks specialization of xkeyval (HA)
  xkeyval.sty    2005/08/12 v2.5d package option processing (HA)
  xkeyval.tex    2005/08/12 v2.5d key=value parser (HA)
pst-node.sty    2006/01/01 package wrapper for pst-node.tex
pst-node.tex    2000/11/09 97 patch 11 `pst-node' (tvz)
pst-node.pro
pommereau.tex

> bsp46.tex is unchanged and still fails with:

corrected

> But I would like to return to my actual problem, which I solved
> partially. I stripped down my tex file to fp_pstricks_mini.tex an tried
> \parametricplot the two versions
> 
>       /k \dout\space 180 div def t cos t mul k mul t sin t mul k mul}
>       /k \dooo 180 div def t cos t mul k mul t sin t mul k mul}
> 
> only with the first version a correct ps-file(fp_pstricks_mini_dout.ps)
> is created (in the former first version the 't' in \dout was not
> present), in the second version(fp_pstricks_mini_dooo.ps) there the
> space between 2.0 and 180 is missing. I don't understand, why the second
> version is not working, any idea?

in PostScript you still need a space after a TeX-Macro,
because TeX itself "eats" the space.

   /k \dooo\space 180 div def t cos t mul k mul t sin t mul k mul}

Herbert


-- 
LaTeX und Perl in der ZEDAT: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~latex