[pdftex] OT: Linux AR 7.0 released: another comment
h h extern
pragma at wxs.nl
Mon May 2 10:03:51 CEST 2005
James Quirk wrote:
> The degradation in performance is alarming: AR 7.0 is seventy five times
> slower than AR 5.1 in turning off 2,000 widgets. This would suggest that
widgets have associated appearance streams (i.e. in a tex field, the text string
is also internally 'rendered' as a stream of pdf tokens, don't ask me why -) so
it may be that there is some serious memory allocation/deallocation and messed
up garbage collection going on (if also javascript is involved, for instance
because one does checks, even more mem problems may be the cause - i'm still not
sure if the most recent javascript plug in collects garbage at all); it may well
be that acrobat 5 was fast because it was bugged and didn't do thinsg it ws
supposed to do, for instance running calculation and validation javascripts -)
> Adobe's software testing does not run to checking how well the PD format
> scales. But this would be in keeping with the picture that Nelson paints.
i'm pretty confident that they don't do real torture tests; keep in mind that
pdftex is one of the few apps that can generate such tests -)
> p.s. Before dismissing the present perfomance test as artificial,
> you might care to look at the documents:
>
> http://www.amrita-ebook.org/doc/asme/cfd-policy
> http://www.amrita-ebook.org/doc/amr2003
>
> both of which employ 100's of widget annotations to good effect.
in your case you also suffer from slow rendering; it may be that some 500
widgets on one page result in 500 times repainting the screen due to sycn and
timing problems; my experience (on windows) is that rendering of complex pages
is slower then it was before, apart from persistent accuracy problems in some
situation:
- with regards to math rendering (composed root symbols and such) we're back at
acrobat 2 quality level
- when for instance transparent us used, anti aliasing is rather poor and
counter productive (was also true in v 6)
- browser integration is of such quality that one needs to close open browsers
and kill the mem persistent acrobat process in the hard way
well, one gets accustomed to it, and we have no real reason to complain, since
so far no one came up with a full featured alternative [for instance pugins to
xpdf for widget support and ports to other platforms], of widget plugins for
gsview, or ... [maybe things are simply not so simple]
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the pdftex
mailing list