[pdftex] Harlequin RIP 5.3 and PDFTeX
Jeffrey McArthur
jeffmcarthur at home.com
Sat Oct 6 22:59:29 CEST 2001
On Sat, 6 Oct 2001 14:41:11 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>Sounds like a RIP issue to me. If Acrobat is able to make a "clean" PS
>file from the PDF file, and the newly distilled PDF file looks the same as
>the original, then I tend to think the original PDF file is good.
Actually I know the original PDF is not good. We have the same RIP as at
least one of the printers we work with. And we know they will would not
install a new version of the RIP software even if it was free since we are
supposedly the only group that produces PDFs that have any problems.
>So you are using a Harlequin RIP. Which imagesetting device are you using?
It really does not matter. If the PDF out of PDFTeX will not run through
any level 3 RIP, then we are stuck.
The problem is very political. A lot of people we deal with want files from
PDFTeX to fail. They will find any excuse they can to say that PDFTeX does
not produce "press-quality" PDF files.
So far, they have a point. You cannot send a PDF generated by PDFTeX to a
printer and expect them to be able to print your book with it. You have to
flip the PDF from PDFTeX back to postscript and then re-distill it to
produce a "press-quality" PDF file.
This is sort of a shame, since now PDFWriter and MS-Word can produce a file
that will go through the RIP without any problems, so Word is now
"press-quality" but PDFTeX is not.
More information about the pdftex
mailing list