[pdftex] Indirect objects table size

[Martin Schroeder]

On 2001-11-16 09:34:56 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
> At 11:00 PM 11/15/2001 +0100, Martin Schroeder wrote:
> >Probably not. But I don't want a customer calling our support
> >because TeX needs a wizard to enlarge it. 512k has not a large
> >enough safety range for my taste -- imagine a page with 32k
> >objects (difficult, I agree, but possible) included 128 times.
> 
> well. that's 32k + 128 objects since it can be reused -)

Then make that 128 different pages all with 32k objects. Equally
possible. :-)

Best regards
        Martin

P.S.: Normally these support calls come when I'm at a TeX
      conference. :-)
-- 
                http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/