[OS X TeX] Re: FYI: Support for Carbon Emacs package will end
Peter_Dyballa at Web.DE
Fri Apr 9 18:34:19 CEST 2010
Am 09.04.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Adam M. Goldstein:
> Every now and again I compile it from the source. It is pretty bare-
> bones, which I like, but there is integration with cut and paste, so
> it fits into the mac environment.
More "adaptation" certainly is overkill. And what is the sense of
these extras when they are not available in other Emacs variants as
well? I am also using X11 and Carbon and AppKit variants and I don't
want to think first: does this Emacs has this feature available? Or do
I have to go to the dock and search for that other variant?
I prefer a more open situation/software installation into which other
tools can latch up. Me, *I* am the individual, not GNU Emacs
distribution a or b or c. So I have one personal init file for all
plus a set of customisation files which set up use of slightly
different colours and fonts that all versions have a clear look by
which I can at once find with which variant I am working.
> I install AucTeX myself as well.
And those who seek a more comfortable situation can use Fink or
MacPorts to install AUCTeX - although it could be frustrating to
encounter that the maintainers of this software are quite sure that
you first need to install their variant of TeX, their variant of GNU
Emacs and their variants of whatever (Perl variants, X11, X
server, ...)! Usually a reasonable amount of these pre-requirements
will already be installed, but the local "port" file will need a patch
to become independent of this or that TeX distribution.
> The ns port is extremely reliable. I don't think I've had it hang or
> crash for at least a year. So the adaptation is pretty good.
Yes! Attaching the Help menu is *very* slow. Preparing a bug report is
always faster by some magnitudes with the X11 variant. Many other
actions (starting a compilation of LaTeX or some programme source,
invoking a command in *shell* buffer or a shell command on some
region) are also slow. I have the feeling that Carbon Emacsen perform
here better, but then they have problems in international environments
were Latin and non-Latin scripts are mixed. Here Cocoa (and maybe
AppKit, too) shows its power.
I'd like to see Emacs packages install their additional open software
for example in /Library/Application Support/Emacs, outside of their
application bundles. This would work with an installation package, at
least for this open software part, and not by simply dragging the
complete Emacs application to /Applications.
For some reason, this fortune reminds everyone of Marvin Zelkowitz.
More information about the macostex-archives