[OS X TeX] XeLaTeX from TeXShop
redrooz at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 6 18:51:50 CET 2009
--- On Fri, 2/6/09, Herbert Schulz <herbs at wideopenwest.com> wrote:
> From: Herbert Schulz <herbs at wideopenwest.com>
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] XeLaTeX from TeXShop
> To: redrooz at yahoo.com, "TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List" <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
> Date: Friday, February 6, 2009, 9:21 AM
> On Feb 6, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Red Roo wrote:
> > On Fri Jan 16 17:50:51 CET 2009 Peter Vamos P.Vamos
> >> Members of this list might be interested in
> reading this article by
> >> George Gratzer, no stranger, in the January issue
> of the AMS Notices
> >> Part I: Breaking Free. Editor's note: This is
> the first of a series
> >> of columns updating the mathematical community
> about some current
> >> developments in TeX and TeXing.
> > I tried running the XeLaTeX example from p. 54 of the
> above AMS article with TeXShop 2.18, but it fails to find
> the Garamond Premier Pro font. I had the impression from
> both the AMS article and the installation instructions for
> MaxTeX.mpkg of Jan 8, 2009, that this would work 'out of
> the box.' What do I need to do?
> > This looks like a pathing problem. If I replace to the
> Garamond with Times Roman, it typesets fine. I am explicitly
> typesetting with the XeLaTeX menu option and UTF-8 encoding.
> The platform is MacOS X 10.5.6 (Leopard) on an Intel
> Are you sure you have the Garamond Premier Pro font?
> Good Luck,
> Herb Schulz
> (herbs at wideopenwest dot com)
No, I'm not sure of anything. But as someone else pointed out, Garamond is a commercial font. It might've helped if the AMS author had pointed that out in his demo. The dichotomy between FOSS/open and commercial/proprietary is something that could usefully be flagged for those of us who don't pay so much attention to the commercial world of fonts.
Anyway, thanks for the explanation.
More information about the macostex-archives