[OS X TeX] multi cores
Peter Dyballa
Peter_Dyballa at Web.DE
Wed Dec 16 12:54:36 CET 2009
Am 16.12.2009 um 02:50 schrieb George Gratzer:
>> You are using the shell's built-in timer, which cannot be very
>> exact. In bash and GNU's date command, i.e., the command gdate,
>> which has a resolution of nsec, you could run
>>
>> START=$(gdate +%s.%N) ; latex -interaction=batchmode GLT3 ; END=$
>> (gdate +%s.%N) ; DIFF=$(echo "$END - $START" | bc) ; echo $DIFF
>
>
> This gives:
>
>
> (standard_in) 2: parse error
I presume the "parse error" happens in your gdate, which is not the
real GNU date. To check this invoke on the command line:
gdate "+%A, der %x %X.%N %Z %z"
It'll output something like: "Mittwoch, der 16.12.2009
12:24:48.900835000 CET +0100" – and you can see here that my G4 clock
is only exact to the µsec! (At least in gdate.)
>
>
>> This one-liner will measure from start to end of the execution. The
>> DIFF value times four (you mentioned once that not all the cores
>> are used) might give the "real" time. Another approach is to use
>> Sun's built-in DTraceToolkit:
>>
>> sudo procsystime -eoT latex -interaction=batchmode GLT3
>
> I tried this. I got
>
> SYSCALL TIME (ns)
> thread_selfid 1387
> geteuid 1441
> ...
> ioctl 6244794
> write_nocancel 7047911
> read_nocancel 11918684
> access 26760916
> TOTAL: 60578713
>
> CPU Times for command latex -interaction=batchmode GLT3,
>
> SYSCALL TIME (ns)
> thread_selfid 259
> geteuid 340
> ...
> ioctl 6241617
> write_nocancel 6316663
> read_nocancel 7924768
> access 15639946
> TOTAL: 42422149
>
> What does it mean?
The first table lists the total elapsed time of all system or library
calls latex performed while converting the TEX file to PDF, the second
table shows how long one call lasted on *any* one, a real or a virtual
one, of the CPUs used. (By using -ceoT you could get a table with the
number of function calls happened.) The list of functions called is
not exact, many more were used, but these were internal functions.
DTrace can only see what is directed to the system.
What one can see from the two tables is that some calls a very
expensive, for example the four I cited from your message.
After all I have to start believing that Snow Leopard, the i7 CPU, and
TeX are extremely fast and efficient: 60 msec of actual CPU (or CPUs?)
use time for external system ressources. Incredible... (and I'm
starting to feel the need for an i7/i5 MacBook! What I see on my G4 is
a factor of 50-100 for the actual process time in relation to the use
time of "external" ressources.)
--
Greetings
Pete
The best way to accelerate a PC is 9.8 m/s² – not that much!
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list