[OS X TeX] your wiki needs you?

[Herbert Schulz]

On Sep 17, 2008, at 9:13 AM, Joseph C. Slater PE, PhD wrote:

>
> On Sep 16, 2008, at 7:24 PM, cfrees at imapmail.org wrote:
>
>> On Wed 17th Sep, 2008 at 00:09, Mark Eli Kalderon seems to have  
>> written:
>>
>>> The page about editors <http://mactex-wiki.tug.org/wiki/index.php?title=Editors 
>>> > has no mention of TextMate. That's a serious omission, I think.  
>>> Just my two cents. Best, Mark
>>
>> It is a front end, isn't it? If not, I can move it onto the editors
>> page. The question is: does it include a viewer? It was listed on the
>> front ends page so I assume it does but I don't use it so don't know.
>
> Apparently it doesn't have a viewer. I got this from looking at the  
> videos on the web site.
>
> Now, why did I have to spend the time investigating this when you  
> presumably already know this? I certainly have more pressing  
> concerns (heck, I lost 1/4 of my shingles to a hurricane on Sunday!)
>
> Bottom line: users of TextMate need to be the ones who know what it  
> is (I would hope), and put it in the right place. This isn't a  
> serious omission to either Clea or myself because we don't use it  
> (apparently).
>
> I'm trying to be rather pointed because Clea is not THE maintainer  
> of the wiki, nor am I! Clea has put in a lot of effort on this, well  
> beyond a reasonable amount. I can't fathom it being sustained, but  
> it certainly isn't reasonable to turn Clea, me or any other person  
> into a personal secretary. PLEASE read the first line on each page  
> (where I remembered to put it. It states that the readers need to  
> become the editors. Why send an email about a problem with the wiki  
> when you can simply correct it? WE DON'T KNOW EVERYTHING! Please  
> just fix the problems with the wiki. Even with all the work Clea has  
> put into it, the wiki is far from done.
>
> Joe
>


Howdy,

Would a user of iTeXMac please update the section about iTeXMac. It is  
sorely out of date. I fixed some bad English but I know that the  
information itself is out of ddate and the statements about it vs  
TeXShop are also out of date (on both sides).

Good Luck,

Herb Schulz
(herbs at wideopenwest.com)