[OS X TeX] MacTeX-2008
Jean-Claude DE SOZA
jeanclaudedesoza at wanadoo.fr
Sat Sep 6 07:05:31 CEST 2008
Richard,
Le 5 sept. 08 à 18:02, Richard Koch a écrit :
> Folks,
>
> On Sep 5, 2008, at 1:22 AM, Anthony Morton wrote, after quoting Bruno
>
>>> Why does MacTeX do that? I plead guilty for this. Initially the
>>> Perl/Tk install package prepared by Dick Koch installed everything
>>> exactly as the standard installation procedure, namely scripts in /
>>> usr/bin. Dick's idea was precisely that people would get exactly
>>> the same as with the standard install, for compatibility purposes.
>>> I asked that /usr/local/bin was used instead,
>
>> And you did the right thing. No third-party installer should be
>> putting stuff in /usr/bin, ever. The only things that belong in
>> there are components supplied by the OS vendor. That's a long-
>> standing Unix-ish convention.
>
> Bruno completely convinced me of this, and it didn't hurt that Karl
> Berry chimed in at his most insistent.
>
> Let me add an important conjecture. I believe that these five
> binaries are irrelevant. To me they look like EXAMPLES. One, for
> example, uses Perl/Tk to implement a GUI editor with only a few
> lines of code. I think we could eliminate the binaries entirely
> without affecting the use of Perl/Tk for "tlmgr --gui", but I was
> afraid to try!
>
> Dick
You are right. I had Tk installed before through CPAN. I deleted the
five binaries and TeXLive Manager works as usual.
I think we can get rid of these five binaries.
Jean-Claude DE SOZA
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list