[OS X TeX] thanks
soumya dipta
soumyadiptabanerjee at yahoo.com
Thu Mar 6 08:23:50 CET 2008
Hi everyone,
Thanks a million to Luis and Robert for your prompt and accurate reply. It was a great help and I could partially compile my documents. However there are as it happens there is multiple tex distribution in my system the gwtex and the mactex and i am somehow unable to keep both and link one to itexmac and the other to texmaker.
Any idea about what should be done will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks once again
Soumya
----- Original Message ----
From: "macosx-tex-request at email.esm.psu.edu" <macosx-tex-request at email.esm.psu.edu>
To: macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2008 3:00:05 PM
Subject: MacOSX-TeX Digest, Vol 5, Issue 4
Send MacOSX-TeX mailing list submissions to
macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
macosx-tex-request at email.esm.psu.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
macosx-tex-owner at email.esm.psu.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of MacOSX-TeX digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Thanks... (Andrei Sobolevskii)
2. Re: XeLaTeX in Acrobat (Maarten Sneep)
3. Re: Thanks... (Nestor Aguilera)
4. Re: Thanks... (Tim Brophy)
5. Re: LaTeX in Languages Other Than English (David Derbes)
6. Re: XeLaTeX in Acrobat (François Chaplais)
7. Re: XeLaTeX in Acrobat (Bruno Voisin)
8. Re: XeLaTeX in Acrobat (William Adams)
9. Re: XeLaTeX in Acrobat (François Chaplais)
10. Re: XeLaTeX in Acrobat (Bruno Voisin)
11. Re: Configuring Texmaker (Luis Sequeira)
12. Re: XeLaTeX in Acrobat (François Chaplais)
13. Re: XeLaTeX in Acrobat (Bruno Voisin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 00:17:40 +0300
From: Andrei Sobolevskii <ansobol at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Thanks...
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <72CB8047-DF93-44C7-A650-3135A5234D3D at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Me too! Gary, thank you very, very much.
And sincere thanks from a non-poster to all those who post regularly
and keep this list so good.
Andrei
On Mar 4, 2008, at 7:14 PM, Enrico Franconi wrote:
> I join the group to thank Gary!
> --e.
>
>> It has been a long time since I thanked Gary Gray for hosting this
>> list. I started back in TeX under OS X 10.1 and I couldn't
>> estimate how long it would have taken me to get back up to speed,
>> after a 10 year hiatus, with TeX. Both this list and Gary's and
>> Joseph Slater's `Mac OS X TeX/LaTeX Web Site' are incredibly
>> useful resources for our small community.
>
> -------------------------- Helpful Info --------------------------
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Reminders and Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
> List Info: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex
> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:53:05 +0100
From: Maarten Sneep <maarten.sneep at xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] XeLaTeX in Acrobat
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <1C0F8BAE-DD65-4D1A-921C-01F1D3C8070F at xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On 4 mrt 2008, at 15:37, François Chaplais wrote:
> I have typeset a textbook with XeLaTex + fontspec, system is 10.4.11
> with october 2007 MacTex installed.
> The text font is Cochin.dfont (provided by Apple).
Can you provide a minimal sample? The font is supplied by Apple, so
most users on this list should have it.
> It prints fine on the two printers I have used, preview is beautiful
> both in TeXShop and Preview, but the preview in Acrobat for windows
> (both versions 6 and 8) is awful at screen sizes, although at great
> magnifications is is OK (but I mean the documents to be read on the
> screen).
> I have output PS to pass them to my son who has distiller CS3, and
> the result is the same in Acrobat Pro for the Mac.
> The issue is that the baseline and other metrics are not handled
> properly by Acrobat at small sizes.
> Aren't here hints in truetype fonts? Or is is it just that Adobe
> despises TT? Do I have to stick to Postscript fonts?
You probably get a better answer on the XeTeX mailing list.
Best,
Maarten
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:04:16 -0300
From: Nestor Aguilera <aguilera at santafe-conicet.gov.ar>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Thanks...
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <e6ee9242110f931ab4b614fbc16cf3ef at santafe-conicet.gov.ar>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
I second (third, fourth,???) the thanks to Gary,
Nestor
On 04 Mar 2008, at 18:17, Andrei Sobolevskii wrote:
> Me too! Gary, thank you very, very much.
>
> And sincere thanks from a non-poster to all those who post regularly
> and keep this list so good.
>
> Andrei
>
> On Mar 4, 2008, at 7:14 PM, Enrico Franconi wrote:
>
>> I join the group to thank Gary!
>> --e.
>>
>>> It has been a long time since I thanked Gary Gray for hosting this
>>> list. I started back in TeX under OS X 10.1 and I couldn't estimate
>>> how long it would have taken me to get back up to speed, after a 10
>>> year hiatus, with TeX. Both this list and Gary's and Joseph Slater's
>>> `Mac OS X TeX/LaTeX Web Site' are incredibly useful resources for
>>> our small community.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:48:28 +0000
From: Tim Brophy <timbrophy at mac.com>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Thanks...
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <C5848670-82C5-48B8-B4C8-88485B268EA2 at mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Me too.
Another non-poster - I don't know enough, but I learn so much from
this list.
Tim Brophy
On 4 Mar 2008, at 23:04, Nestor Aguilera wrote:
> I second (third, fourth,???) the thanks to Gary,
>
> Nestor
>
> On 04 Mar 2008, at 18:17, Andrei Sobolevskii wrote:
>
>> Me too! Gary, thank you very, very much.
>>
>> And sincere thanks from a non-poster to all those who post
>> regularly and keep this list so good.
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> On Mar 4, 2008, at 7:14 PM, Enrico Franconi wrote:
>>
>>> I join the group to thank Gary!
>>> --e.
>>>
>>>> It has been a long time since I thanked Gary Gray for hosting
>>>> this list. I started back in TeX under OS X 10.1 and I couldn't
>>>> estimate how long it would have taken me to get back up to speed,
>>>> after a 10 year hiatus, with TeX. Both this list and Gary's and
>>>> Joseph Slater's `Mac OS X TeX/LaTeX Web Site' are incredibly
>>>> useful resources for our small community.
>
>
> -------------------------- Helpful Info --------------------------
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Reminders and Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
> List Info: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex
> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:00:55 -0600
From: David Derbes <loki at uchicago.edu>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] LaTeX in Languages Other Than English
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <1B46B2B9-6698-4ECD-9989-1A78CC6CCF12 at uchicago.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Mar 4, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Roussanka Loukanova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Jonathan Dann wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I need a bit of information here, when someone writes in LaTeX in
>> non-Roman scripts, i.e. Japanese, Korean, Arabic, are the commands
>> like \section still written in Roman, or are they translated, too?
>> Am I right in understanding that the encodings that many would use
>> for these languages would be UTF-8?
>
> I have done few tests with Bulgarian and Russian languages, both of
> which use Cyrillic, but are somehow different, esp with respect to
> hyphenation. I found several options for encodings for those
> languages. In all cases,
> the LaTeX commands are the way they are, you do not translate them
> (as one wouldn't dare to translate programming languages). In order
> to switch between languages you would use a command like:
>
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage[koi8-r]{inputenc}
> \usepackage[bulgarian,english]{babel}
>
> \selectlanguage{bulgarian}
> Bla-bla in cyrillic...
> \selectlanguage{english}
> bla-bla
>
> For Cyrillic, one can type the text in the Latin alphabet (by standard
> phonetic correspondence), in the tex file (with the exceptions of
> several special letters), but the typeset output will be in Cyrillic
> letters. For small documents this works nicely, esp if one need to
> sent out the latex code by email, with no problems due to platforms.
What Roussanka does I do for Russian; I include a snippet:
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage[T2A]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[russian,english]{babel}
\begin{document}
\selectlanguage{english}
\textbf{Verbs of motion}
\hspace*{1.45in}\emph{uni} \hspace*{2.8in}\emph{multi}
\selectlanguage{russian}
\begin{center}
идт\textbf{и}, ход\textbf{и}ть
\selectlanguage{english}
to go by foot, walk, set off (\emph{501 Russian Verbs}, p.\,490)
\selectlanguage{russian}
\end{center}
\vspace*{-0.25in}
\begin{tabbing}
\hspace*{1.2in}\=\hspace*{1in}\=\hspace{30ex}\=\hspace*{1in}\=\kill
\>ид\textbf{у}\>ид\textbf{ё}м \>хож\textbf{у} \>х
\textbf{o}дим \\
\>ид\textbf{ё}шь\>ид\textbf{ё}те \>х\textbf{o}дишь \>х
\textbf{o}дите \\
\>ид\textbf{ё}т\>ид\textbf{у}т \>х\textbf{o}дит \>х
\textbf{o}д�т \\
\end{tabbing}
\end{document}
A caveat: you have to save the files as Unicode (UTF-8) (in TeXShop,
there's a preference.) I got the Cyrillic with the Russian Phonetic
font from Apple's International font. Command-space toggles the font
from English to Russian Phonetic.
For Greek, I use a different approach:
\documentclass[11pt]{report}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[english,greek]{babel}
\languageattribute{greek}{polutoniko}
\usepackage{gfsporson}
\begin{document}
\normalsize
\selectlanguage{greek}
\begin{center}
\textporson{kt~hm'a te >es a>ie`i m~allon >`h >ag'wnisma >es t`o
paraqr~hma >ako'uein x'ugkeitai} \\
\end{center}
\selectlanguage{english}
\noindent the work was done not to win the applause of the moment, but
as a possession for all time.
\hfill Thucydides, \emph{The Peloponnesian War}, I.22.5
\end{document}
Here, the accented Greek is typed in the Roman alphabet.
And, of course, there is the \fontspec package and XeTeX, which is
probably the easiest and most powerful
approach. But I'll let someone who knows this package a lot better
tell you.
Good luck!
David Derbes
U of Chicago Lab Schools
>
>
> Emacs has options to switch between alphabets (languages).
>
> For special writing systems, like Japanese and Korean, in latex, and
> that on Macs, perhaps you can ask the Carbon Emacs people:
> <http://homepage.mac.com/zenitani/emacs-e.html>
>
> The same what they do should work somehow with TeXShop too.
> But may be somebody on this list will give a better guide than me.
>
> Roussanka
>
>
> >
>> Thanks, as always, for any time you give me.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> Jonathan P Dann: Trainee Medical Physicist - Homepage - Flickr
>> contact | j.p.dann at gmail.com - 07515-352-490 | skype - jonathandann
>>
>>
>
>
> -------------------------- Helpful Info --------------------------
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Reminders and Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
> List Info: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex
> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:25:10 +0100
From: François Chaplais <francois.chaplais at ensmp.fr>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] XeLaTeX in Acrobat
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <17A03050-C2EE-4C0A-8A70-2DD193ACDD36 at ensmp.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Le 4 mars 08 à 22:53, Maarten Sneep a écrit :
> On 4 mrt 2008, at 15:37, François Chaplais wrote:
>
>> I have typeset a textbook with XeLaTex + fontspec, system is
>> 10.4.11 with october 2007 MacTex installed.
>> The text font is Cochin.dfont (provided by Apple).
>
> Can you provide a minimal sample? The font is supplied by Apple, so
> most users on this list should have it.
>
here is a sample source
----------------------------------
% XeLaTeX can use any Mac OS X font. See the setromanfont command below.
% Input to XeLaTeX is full Unicode, so Unicode characters can be
typed directly into the source.
% The next lines tell TeXShop to typeset with xelatex, and to open
and save the source with Unicode encoding.
%!TEX TS-program = xelatex
%!TEX encoding = UTF-8 Unicode
\documentclass[12pt]{report}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,epsfig}
\usepackage[french]{babel}
%\usepackage{geometry} % See geometry.pdf to learn the
layout options. There are lots.
%\geometry{letterpaper} % ... or a4paper or a5paper
or ...
%\geometry{landscape} % Activate for for rotated page
geometry
%\usepackage[parfill]{parskip} % Activate to begin paragraphs with
an empty line rather than an indent
\usepackage{graphics}
\usepackage{amssymb}
% Will Robertson's fontspec.sty can be used to simplify font choices.
% To experiment, open /Applications/Font Book to examine the fonts
provided on Mac OS X,
% and change "Hoefler Text" to any of these choices.
\usepackage{fontspec,xltxtra,xunicode}
\defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text}
\setmainfont[Mapping=tex-text]{Cochin}
\setsansfont[Scale=MatchLowercase,Mapping=tex-text]{Gill Sans}
\setmonofont[Scale=MatchLowercase]{Andale Mono}
\def \i {{i}}
\makeindex
\title{\fontspec{Zapfino}Notes de cours ``Ondelettes et traitement du
signal''%\\
%Ecole Centrale Mai-Juin 2005
}
\author{Fran\c{c}ois Chaplais
\thanks{ Ces notes de cours doivent beaucoup au livre de St\'{e}phane
Mallat ``A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing'', Academic Press.}\\
francois.chaplais at ensmp.fr\\ http://cas.ensmp.fr/\~{ }chaplais/
% d'apr\`{e}s St\'ephane Mallat
}
%\date{} % Activate to
display a given date or no date
\begin{document}
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\maketitle
\newpage
\chapter{Introduction}
\section{Parties r\'{e}guli\`{e}res et singuli\`{e}res d'un signal}
\subsection{D\'{e}tection de bords dans une image}
On consid\`{e}re l'image de synth\`{e}se \ref{Table.fig} dont on
cherche \`{a} d\'{e}tecter les bords en vue d'une reconnaissance
d'objets. Les bords sont assimil\'{e}s \`{a} des variations brusque
d'intensit\'{e} lumineuse (l'information de couleur n'est
interpr\'{e}t\'{e}e dans cet exemple).
I have baseline problems in Acrobat.
\end{document}
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
The problem is the display in Acrobat Reader (typically at 100%).
>> It prints fine on the two printers I have used, preview is
>> beautiful both in TeXShop and Preview, but the preview in Acrobat
>> for windows (both versions 6 and 8) is awful at screen sizes,
>> although at great magnifications is is OK (but I mean the
>> documents to be read on the screen).
>> I have output PS to pass them to my son who has distiller CS3, and
>> the result is the same in Acrobat Pro for the Mac.
>> The issue is that the baseline and other metrics are not handled
>> properly by Acrobat at small sizes.
>> Aren't here hints in truetype fonts? Or is is it just that Adobe
>> despises TT? Do I have to stick to Postscript fonts?
>
> You probably get a better answer on the XeTeX mailing list.
do you mean this
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
best,
François
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:37:27 +0100
From: Bruno Voisin <bvoisin at mac.com>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] XeLaTeX in Acrobat
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <2E6F53E0-6046-429A-9A01-257014B4C5BE at mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Le 4 mars 08 à 15:37, François Chaplais a écrit :
> It prints fine on the two printers I have used, preview is beautiful
> both in TeXShop and Preview, but the preview in Acrobat for windows
> (both versions 6 and 8) is awful at screen sizes, although at great
> magnifications is is OK (but I mean the documents to be read on the
> screen).
> I have output PS to pass them to my son who has distiller CS3, and
> the result is the same in Acrobat Pro for the Mac.
> The issue is that the baseline and other metrics are not handled
> properly by Acrobat at small sizes.
> Aren't here hints in truetype fonts? Or is is it just that Adobe
> despises TT? Do I have to stick to Postscript fonts?
Adobe Reader and Acrobat use their own PDF rendering engine, which is
different from the built-in OS X rendering engine used by other
applications (Preview, TeXShop, ...). What you see is a manifestation
of that.
I tried with your test file and the two XDVI-to-PDF drivers XeLaTeX
can use: the default (for now) xdv2pdf and the alternative (for now)
xdvipdfmx. Both embed the fonts (Cochin and Zapfino) properly, thus
there's no problem there. It really just comes down to how Adobe
applications render PDF, namely to how they use font hints to draw on
screen.
Remember that Adobe applications for the Mac are essentially second-
thought hasty Mac ports of Windows applications, though that probably
isn't the only cause for the problem, given you experience the same
rendering issues with Acrobat on Windows.
Here are screenshots on what I see with Acrobat and Preview (on
Leopard 10.5.2):
http://homepage.mac.com/bvoisin/.cv/bvoisin/Sites/.Public/Acrobat.png-zip.zip
http://homepage.mac.com/bvoisin/.cv/bvoisin/Sites/.Public/Preview.png-zip.zip
Acrobat output isn't that bad: the vertical alignment of characters in
the "Introduction" title is admittedly not as nice as that with
Preview, but that's probably just the result of the rendering choices
hardwired within Acrobat.
Bruno Voisin
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 07:19:15 -0500
From: William Adams <will.adams at frycomm.com>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] XeLaTeX in Acrobat
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <9A1F3681-0A4E-4489-B261-FD23B7987D11 at frycomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Mar 4, 2008, at 9:37 AM, François Chaplais wrote:
> I have output PS to pass them to my son who has distiller CS3, and
> the result is the same in Acrobat Pro for the Mac.
> The issue is that the baseline and other metrics are not handled
> properly by Acrobat at small sizes.
> Aren't here hints in truetype fonts? Or is is it just that Adobe
> despises TT? Do I have to stick to Postscript fonts?
Depend on the settings you used, going to PostScript may be stripping
out the hints.
Also, the appearance of subtle features can be influenced by your anti-
aliasing features.
If the book is being printed commercially, then the lack of the hints
won't matter (if the text needs the hinting it's too small to be
reproduced). If you want to distribute the .pdf, then skip the .ps
creation and redistillation for the distributed version.
William
--
William Adams
senior graphic designer
Fry Communications
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:07:20 +0100
From: François Chaplais <francois.chaplais at ensmp.fr>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] XeLaTeX in Acrobat
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <47CCDBD1-402F-48F4-BBD3-6350245600A7 at ensmp.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Le 5 mars 08 à 10:37, Bruno Voisin a écrit :
> Adobe Reader and Acrobat use their own PDF rendering engine, which
> is different from the built-in OS X rendering engine used by other
> applications (Preview, TeXShop, ...). What you see is a
> manifestation of that.
>
> I tried with your test file and the two XDVI-to-PDF drivers XeLaTeX
> can use: the default (for now) xdv2pdf and the alternative (for
> now) xdvipdfmx. Both embed the fonts (Cochin and Zapfino) properly,
> thus there's no problem there. It really just comes down to how
> Adobe applications render PDF, namely to how they use font hints to
> draw on screen.
>
> Remember that Adobe applications for the Mac are essentially second-
> thought hasty Mac ports of Windows applications, though that
> probably isn't the only cause for the problem, given you experience
> the same rendering issues with Acrobat on Windows.
>
> Here are screenshots on what I see with Acrobat and Preview (on
> Leopard 10.5.2):
>
> http://homepage.mac.com/bvoisin/.cv/bvoisin/Sites/.Public/
> Acrobat.png-zip.zip
> http://homepage.mac.com/bvoisin/.cv/bvoisin/Sites/.Public/
> Preview.png-zip.zip
Thanks Bruno for your help.
From your screenshots, it appears that your Acrobat rendering is
better than my son's or what I get for windows. If you are willing to
look, the pdf produced by XeLateX and TeXShop (with standard
settings,"Regular") is here
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/francois.chaplais/test.pdf
A screenshot of what I get with the Latest Acrobat for windows with
win XP SP2 under VMWare Fusion is here
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/francois.chaplais/AcroWin.jpg
From what I have seen on the XeTeX site ( http://scripts.sil.org/cms/
scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=xetex_download )
XeTeX has not been updated since 2006, so I assume I have the latest
version.
Or maybe the pdf engine has changed for Leopard? I am under 10.4.11.
Best
François
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:35:42 +0100
From: Bruno Voisin <bvoisin at mac.com>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] XeLaTeX in Acrobat
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <D44E95E1-9C46-4A5E-BB97-F0C46A2FB0CC at mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Le 5 mars 08 à 14:07, François Chaplais a écrit :
> From your screenshots, it appears that your Acrobat rendering is
> better than my son's or what I get for windows. If you are willing
> to look, the pdf produced by XeLateX and TeXShop (with standard
> settings,"Regular") is here
> http://pagesperso-orange.fr/francois.chaplais/test.pdf
> A screenshot of what I get with the Latest Acrobat for windows with
> win XP SP2 under VMWare Fusion is here
> http://pagesperso-orange.fr/francois.chaplais/AcroWin.jpg
There's indeed something wrong with your file: with Acrobat on
Leopard, I get essentially the same as you do
http://homepage.mac.com/bvoisin/.cv/bvoisin/Sites/.Public/Chaplais.png-zip.zip
I can't really figure out what's wrong. Here's what I get using the
pdfinfo and pdffonts tools from xpdf <http://users.phg-online.de/tk/MOSXS/
>:
$ pdfinfo test.pdf
Title: XeTeX output 2008.03.05:1326
Creator: xdv2pdf
Producer: Mac OS X 10.4.11 Quartz PDFContext
CreationDate: Wed Mar 5 13:26:58 2008
ModDate: Wed Mar 5 13:26:58 2008
Tagged: no
Pages: 2
Encrypted: no
Page size: 595 x 842 pts (A4)
File size: 32711 bytes
Optimized: no
PDF version: 1.3
$ pdffonts test.pdf
name type emb sub uni
object ID
------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- ---
---------
RPANYH+Zapfino TrueType yes yes
no 5 0
DOSXBR+Zapfino TrueType yes yes
yes 6 0
HCXZYL+Cochin TrueType yes yes
no 7 0
JXKLMC+Cochin-Bold TrueType yes yes no
13 0
And here's what I get with the PDF file obtained by processing locally
your input file with XeLaTeX (+ xdv2pdf):
$ pdfinfo test-xdv2pdf.pdf
Title: XeTeX output 2008.03.05:1505
Creator: xdv2pdf
Producer: Mac OS X 10.5.2 Quartz PDFContext
CreationDate: Wed Mar 5 14:05:43 2008
ModDate: Wed Mar 5 14:05:43 2008
Tagged: no
Pages: 2
Encrypted: no
Page size: 595 x 842 pts (A4)
File size: 31852 bytes
Optimized: no
PDF version: 1.3
theo9mc182:Desktop bvoisin$ pdffonts test-xdv2pdf.pdf
name type emb sub uni
object ID
------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- ---
---------
ZBRDDM+Cochin TrueType yes yes
no 9 0
LOATPH+Zapfino TrueType yes yes
no 7 0
FHRQEL+Zapfino TrueType yes yes
yes 8 0
PCXCHC+Cochin-Bold TrueType yes yes no
14 0
And with XeLaTeX + xdvipdfmx:
$ pdfinfo test-xdvipdfmx.pdf
Producer: xdvipdfmx (0.4)
CreationDate: Wed Mar 5 15:05:09 2008
Tagged: no
Pages: 2
Encrypted: no
Page size: 595.27 x 841.82 pts (A4)
File size: 31658 bytes
Optimized: no
PDF version: 1.4
$ pdffonts test-xdvipdfmx.pdf
name type emb sub uni
object ID
------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- ---
---------
PSFJYU+Zapfino CID TrueType yes yes
yes 5 0
YHHRAN+Cochin CID TrueType yes yes
yes 7 0
OEVORN+Cochin-Bold CID TrueType yes yes yes
12 0
> From what I have seen on the XeTeX site ( http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=xetex_download
> )
> XeTeX has not been updated since 2006, so I assume I have the latest
> version.
XeTeX has indeed been updated: the version included in MacTeX or gwTeX
is from early 2007. And the version on the SVN repository (uncompiled,
you've got to compile it yourself) has received a very large number of
modifications/fixes. This version is at
http://scripts.sil.org/svn-view/xetex/TRUNK.tar.gz?view=tar
and the compilation instructions are those in the section "Building
from scratch" from
http://scripts.sil.org/xetex_linux
You need to have Xcode installed in order to be able to compile.
Personally I'm just using the version from MacTeX, for which:
$ xetex -version
XeTeX 3.141592-0.996 (Web2C 7.5.6)
kpathsea version 3.5.6
Copyright 2007 SIL International.
Kpathsea is copyright 2007 Karl Berry and Olaf Weber.
There is NO warranty. Redistribution of this software is
covered by the terms of both the XeTeX copyright and
the Lesser GNU General Public License.
For more information about these matters, see the file
named COPYING and the XeTeX source.
Primary author of XeTeX: Jonathan Kew.
Kpathsea written by Karl Berry, Olaf Weber, and others.
Compiled with ICU version 3.4 [with modifications for XeTeX]
Compiled with zlib version 1.2.3; using 1.2.3
Compiled with FreeType2 version 2.2.1; using 2.2.1
Using Mac OS X Carbon, Cocoa & QuickTime frameworks
Do you get the same info regarding FreeType and such? Did you install
FreeType? It's normally installed automatically with MacTeX. With
gwTeX you've got to install it separately (there's an i-Package for it).
> Or maybe the pdf engine has changed for Leopard? I am under 10.4.11.
What you might try is use xdvipdfmx instead of xdv2pdf. Assuming
you're using TeXShop, go to ~/Library/TeXShop/Engines/Inactive/XeTeX/
and move XeTeX-xdvipdfmx.engine and XeLaTeX-xdvipdfmx.engine to ~/
Library/TeXShop/Engines/. Then, in your input file, change the line
%!TEX TS-program = xelatex
to
%!TEX TS-program = xelatex-xdvipdfmx
Typeset, and see what happens.
Hope this works,
Bruno Voisin
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:37:34 +0000
From: Luis Sequeira <lfsequeira at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Configuring Texmaker
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <81A08E31-E632-4DD8-9201-844487E99D44 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
> Hi,
> I am a switching over from Windows to
> Mac OS I am yet unable to configure the Texmaker program.
> I have checked the online documentation but found it too brief and
> ill-suited to my purpose.
> Any help in this regard will be well appreciated.
> Thanks
> Soumya
First: you have to have a working TeX installation.
The easiest way to do it is to install MacTeX. You can get it here: http://mirror.ctan.org/systems/mac/mactex/MacTeX.dmg
Use the installer included in the downloaded file and that's it.
(Note: it is a lengthy download)
Second: You have to tell TeXMaker where your TeX programs are. Open
the "Preferences..." menu under TexMaker. You get what should be a
familiar dialog box with entries for "LaTeX", "dvips", etc.
If you installed MacTex as above, you can set latex, pdflatex, bibtex,
makeindex, ps2pdf to the correct path by replacing whatever comes
before the program name (on my intel mac it was /usr/local/teTeX/bin/
i386-apple-darwin-current)
by /usr/texbin.
For example, the pdflatex entry should read: "/usr/texbin/pdflatex" -
interaction=nonstopmode %.tex
You can leave the gs, dvips, Dvi Viewer, Ps Viewer and Pdf Viewer as
they are.
You should be ready to go.
Happy LaTeXing in Mac OS X :-)
Luis Sequeira
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 16:40:16 +0100
From: François Chaplais <francois.chaplais at ensmp.fr>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] XeLaTeX in Acrobat
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <A2F4251D-6F60-40B9-BE36-D83D8C7904D6 at ensmp.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Le 5 mars 08 à 15:35, Bruno Voisin a écrit :
>
>
> Personally I'm just using the version from MacTeX, for which:
>
> $ xetex -version
> XeTeX 3.141592-0.996 (Web2C 7.5.6)
> kpathsea version 3.5.6
> Copyright 2007 SIL International.
> Kpathsea is copyright 2007 Karl Berry and Olaf Weber.
> There is NO warranty. Redistribution of this software is
> covered by the terms of both the XeTeX copyright and
> the Lesser GNU General Public License.
> For more information about these matters, see the file
> named COPYING and the XeTeX source.
> Primary author of XeTeX: Jonathan Kew.
> Kpathsea written by Karl Berry, Olaf Weber, and others.
>
> Compiled with ICU version 3.4 [with modifications for XeTeX]
> Compiled with zlib version 1.2.3; using 1.2.3
> Compiled with FreeType2 version 2.2.1; using 2.2.1
> Using Mac OS X Carbon, Cocoa & QuickTime frameworks
>
> Do you get the same info regarding FreeType and such? Did you
> install FreeType? It's normally installed automatically with
> MacTeX. With gwTeX you've got to install it separately (there's an
> i-Package for it).
I have the same output for xetex -version in Terminal.
>
>> Or maybe the pdf engine has changed for Leopard? I am under 10.4.11.
>
> What you might try is use xdvipdfmx instead of xdv2pdf. Assuming
> you're using TeXShop, go to ~/Library/TeXShop/Engines/Inactive/
> XeTeX/ and move XeTeX-xdvipdfmx.engine and XeLaTeX-xdvipdfmx.engine
> to ~/Library/TeXShop/Engines/. Then, in your input file, change the
> line
>
> %!TEX TS-program = xelatex
>
> to
>
> %!TEX TS-program = xelatex-xdvipdfmx
>
> Typeset, and see what happens.
>
> Hope this works,
>
done it; it typesets with the same result in Windows Acrobat :-(
It turns out that I have a large library (URW) of fonts that I got
when purchasing Canvas 5. I typeset the test file using a Garamond
postscript type 1 font family and, well, I do not have any baseline
problem anymore at screen size in Windows.
I have re-typeset the document with the TT fonts installed instead of
the PS ones, and the the result has the same appearance.
So maybe the culprit is Cochin, or the way it is PDF'd in Tiger?
BTW the info on Cochin in Font Book is (in French)
Nom PostScript Cochin
Nom complet Cochin
Famille Cochin
Style Regular
Type TrueType
Langue français, anglais, allemand, espagnol, italien, suédois,
danois, finnois, portugais
Version 5.0d1
Emplacement /Library/Fonts/Cochin.dfont
Nom unique Cochin; 5.0d1; Mon, Dec. 1, 2003
Copyright Copyright (c) 1981 Linotype AG and/or its subsidiaries.
Description (c) 1981 Linotype AG and/or its subsidiaries. All Rights
Reserved. This data is the property of Linotype AG and/or its
subsidiaries and may not be reproduced, used, displayed, modified,
disclosed or transferred without the express written approval of
Linotype AG and/or its subsidiaries.
Activée Oui
Doublon Non
Anyway, thanks for the help. I appreciate the amount of expertise on
this list.
François
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 17:22:02 +0100
From: Bruno Voisin <bvoisin at mac.com>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] XeLaTeX in Acrobat
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <35245B93-9BA3-4558-9FEF-663DD939C146 at mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Le 5 mars 08 à 16:40, François Chaplais a écrit :
> So maybe the culprit is Cochin, or the way it is PDF'd in Tiger?
>
> BTW the info on Cochin in Font Book is (in French)
> Nom PostScript Cochin
> Nom complet Cochin
> Famille Cochin
> Style Regular
> Type TrueType
> Langue français, anglais, allemand, espagnol, italien, suédois,
> danois, finnois, portugais
> Version 5.0d1
> Emplacement /Library/Fonts/Cochin.dfont
> Nom unique Cochin; 5.0d1; Mon, Dec. 1, 2003
> Copyright Copyright (c) 1981 Linotype AG and/or its subsidiaries.
> Description (c) 1981 Linotype AG and/or its subsidiaries. All
> Rights Reserved. This data is the property of Linotype AG and/or
> its subsidiaries and may not be reproduced, used, displayed,
> modified, disclosed or transferred without the express written
> approval of Linotype AG and/or its subsidiaries.
> Activée Oui
> Doublon Non
Leopard includes version 6 of the font:
Nom PostScript Cochin
Nom complet Cochin
Famille Cochin
Style Normal
Type TrueType
Langue albanais, allemand, anglais, basque, biélorusse, bokmål
norvégien, bulgare, catalan, cornique, danois, espagnol, estonien,
féroïen, finnois, français, galicien, galla, indonésien, irlandais,
islandais, italien, kazakh, macédonien, malais, manx, néerlandais,
nynorsk norvégien, ouzbek, polonais, portugais, russe, serbe, somali,
suédois, swahili
Version 6.0d3e1
Emplacement /Library/Fonts/Cochin.dfont
Nom unique Cochin; 6.0d3e1; 2007-03-07
Copyright Copyright (c) 1981 Linotype AG and/or its subsidiaries.
Description (c) 1981 Linotype AG and/or its subsidiaries. All Rights
Reserved. This data is the property of Linotype AG and/or its
subsidiaries and may not be reproduced, used, displayed, modified,
disclosed or transferred without the express written approval of
Linotype AG and/or its subsidiaries.
Activée Oui
Doublon Non
Protégé contre la recopie Non
Intégrable Oui
I just checked on the Mac of a colleague, still on Tiger: exactly the
same problem shows up as for you. So (Cochin in) Tiger is indeed the
culprit!
Generally, as Maarten Sneep suggested, for XeTeX-specific issues, and
especially those related to fonts, it's better to post to the XeTeX
mailing list <http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex>. There you'll
find people extremely knowledgeable on fonts; I'm pretty confident
your problem would have been diagnosed there in no time.
Just be aware that the XeTeX list is multi-platform, owing to the now
multi-platform character of XeTeX, so you need to specify your
platform (Mac, Windows, Linux and which brand of it) in order to see
your question addressed efficiently.
Bruno Voisin
------------------------------
-------------------------- Helpful Info --------------------------
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Reminders and Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
List Info: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
End of MacOSX-TeX Digest, Vol 5, Issue 4
****************************************
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/attachments/20080305/f818080c/attachment.html>
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list