[OS X TeX] TeX on Leopard

[Bruno Voisin]

Le 28 oct. 07 à 20:04, Norm Gall a écrit :

> [...]
>
> I did an archive and install of Leopard and then re-installed MacTeX.
>
> Now, the system can't seem to find the basic fonts. Everything was  
> working flawlessly before the upgrade.
>
> Any idea what I have screwed up?
>
> Transcript follows:
>
> [...]
>
> LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `OMS/cmss/m/n' undefined
> (Font)              using `OMS/cmsy/m/n' instead
> (Font)              for symbol `textbullet' on input line 29.
>
>
> LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `OT1/cmss/m/it' in size <10> not  
> available
> (Font)              Font shape `OT1/cmss/m/sl' tried instead on  
> input line 29.
>
> [...]
>
> LaTeX Font Warning: Some font shapes were not available, defaults  
> substituted.
>
> )
> (see the transcript file for additional information)</usr/local/ 
> texlive/2007bas
> ic/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmbx10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/ 
> 2007basic/t
> exmf-dist/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmbx12.pfb></usr/local/texlive/ 
> 2007basic/texmf
> -dist/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2007basic/ 
> texmf-dist
> /fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr6.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2007basic/texmf- 
> dist/fonts
> /type1/bluesky/cm/cmr7.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2007basic/texmf-dist/ 
> fonts/type1
> /bluesky/cm/cmr8.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2007basic/texmf-dist/fonts/ 
> type1/blues
> ky/cm/cmsl10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2007basic/texmf-dist/fonts/ 
> type1/bluesky/c
> m/cmss10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2007basic/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/ 
> bluesky/cm/cm
> ss12.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2007basic/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/ 
> bluesky/cm/cmssbx
> 10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2007basic/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/bluesky/ 
> cm/cmssi10.
> pfb></usr/local/texlive/2007basic/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/ 
> cmsy10.pfb>
> </usr/local/texlive/2007basic/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/ 
> cmti10.pfb>
> Output written on EthicsintheWorkplace.pdf (4 pages, 85689 bytes).
> Transcript written on EthicsintheWorkplace.log.
>
> LaTeX finished at Sun Oct 28 12:59:55

Looks fine to me. There are the usual warnings that some substitutions  
have taken place, and then the indication that the fonts cmr10 etc.  
have been successfully included in the resulting PDF.

What is exactly the problem you're seeing?

That said, the 2007basic instead of 2007 in the path looks odd. Is  
this some change you did on purpose?

Bruno Voisin
------------------------- Helpful Info -------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
List Reminders & Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/