[OS X TeX] convert .tex file to .html
jmfont at inicia.es
Sun Nov 18 20:06:04 CET 2007
El 18/11/2007, a las 4:25, Richard Koch escribió:
> In the pulldown menu next to the Typeset button, select htlatex.
Strange feature of TeXShop: The new engine "htlatex" is shown in this
pulldown menu but not in the "Typeset" menu in the main menu bar of
the program. Is this OK ? It would be logical that if one adds more
engines then these are shown in both places (actually, I had the
typeset button and menu in the document's toolbar disabled, as for me
the standard menus in the main manu bar are OK, hence I was not
seeing the new engine anywhere, until I turned them on).
By the way, I always wanted to comment that the organization of this
"Typeset" menu of the menu bar does not seem very logical to me. It
contains the choice of the typesetting engine (choosing between
plain, LaTeX, ConTeXt) and the script (pdftex vs ghostscript), which
together determined how a .tex file is typeset, but it also mixes
them with the choice of totally different auxiliary programs such as
MakeIndex, BibTeX, MetaFont or MetaPost. As I said, I find this
logically inconsistent, ot disturbing. I would be in favour of a
separate "Tools" menu, with a "Run tool" option with function similar
to the "Typeset" option in the "Typeset" menu. It is odd for me to
select "BibTeX" and then "Typeset" in order to run BibTeX! Curiously,
the "button menu" appearing in the toolbar lists only the engines and
the tools, not the scripts.
More radically, why not separate the three issues in three different
menus, where the first one could be called, as in TeX parlance,
"Format" rather than "engine", the second "Script", and the third
"Tools". Less radically, at least I would separate the tools from the
engines or formats by an hline in the menu, as happens now with the
scripts, and call the main "action" option "Run" rather than "Typeset".
More information about the macostex-archives