# [OS X TeX] Texlive-mac os

Roussanka Loukanova rloukano at stp.lingfil.uu.se
Wed Mar 7 21:33:39 CET 2007

Javier, I got the files, but the easiest way to look through them
would be (while I go to do some grocery, already getting quite late...)
if you would put them on your public directory, leave the permissions

rwxr-xr-x .... beamerexample1.pdf

Herb's suggestion for the temporary fixes is very practical. And, Bruno's
suggestion for the [table] has brought some relieve, despite that
i haven't used any such tables in my own beamer files. Now, after we have
discussed that so much, it seems I have to get at least one...

Roussanka

On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Javier Elizondo wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Roussanka Loukanova <rloukano at stp.lingfil.uu.se>
> To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2007 12:48:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Texlive-mac os
>
>> But beamerexample1.tex doesn't have \rowcolors[\hline] or longtable.
>> Bruno's explanation is correct and his suggestion works: I tested it with
> <both TeX distributions, gwTeX and TeXLive-07.
>
> I do not know what is happening, I had sent you the two files in pdf that I got, one obtained  in linux, and the other one with texlive, with "table" added as Bruno suggested.
>
> The last page of the two files are different. The one that was running in the mac, with the changes suggested  by Bruno, the letters appeared almost without color, no color on them. The one in linux have the right colors.
>
> Anyway, I know that being practical it is possible to rewrite the file in different form for getting what it is wanted. But, my point is that if a package is updated, why is not considered other packages that have a strong interaction with it?.  It should, right?.
>
> Regards to everyone, Javier.