[OS X TeX] rotating vs landscape in two-sided documents
Bruno Voisin
bvoisin at mac.com
Sun Feb 11 19:45:50 CET 2007
Le 11 févr. 07 à 18:38, Chabot Denis a écrit :
> Well, thanks to the help of many people here, my report is almost
> complete and I am very happy with the result, although I hope
> future reports will allow me to concentrate on content and not on
> formatting, one advantage of using LaTeX that was not achieved for
> this particular document...
That is an advantage I have never seen achieved in practice. LaTeX is
so insistent on imposing a specific formatting, and it may be so
inconvenient to use at times (think for example of having to combine
longtable, multline, array and \multicolumn in order to write a midly
complicated table), that in my experience using LaTeX means spending
more time formatting and less time writing.
More specifically, LaTeX is nice when you are using a dedicated
package yielding exactly the desired formatting (for example a
journal-specific class), and/or when you document contains a lot of
maths.
But when you want to write a memo or report, say, and the standard
article, report or book classes do not meet your needs exactly, then
you'll spend an awful lot of time interrupting your workflow to deal
with some formatting issues, look for some style to accomplish a
specific task, search a FAQ, post to a mailing list, and so forth. In
those cases I find it more efficient and stress-free to use a WYSIWYG
word processor (Pages in my case). The output will possibly be less
typographically correct, but it will be achieved more easily, and it
will be possible to devote more attention to the matter at hand
without having constantly to interrupt the thinking for dealing with
some formatting issue; it will also be easier to start writing the
document without having a clear idea of its content or presentation,
and then reorganize matter, move things around, add columns in table,
switch columns, and so forth.
I know this is probably a controversial issue on an OS X TeX list,
but in my opinion (from 15 years or so of intensive TeX use), however
convenient it may be for maths writing or for using a predefined
style, LaTeX has failed spectacularly in its aim to allow users to
concentrate on writing and free them from formatting. In this respect
plain TeX was more flexible.
Bruno Voisin
------------------------- Helpful Info -------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
List Reminders & Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list