[OS X TeX] New Mac
rjmm-lists1 at fireflyuk.net
Sun Sep 17 23:49:56 CEST 2006
> Let me repeat my educated opinion that a Laptop should be considered
> as a substitute for the real thing (fast computer, large monitor),
> which has its merits when travelling.
> If you have the advantage of sitting at your own desk, you should use
> a fast computer and a large monitor for texing (24" is sufficient,
> but only Apple's 30" Cinema display will make texing fun).
I first used OzTeX on a Macintosh Classic (9" mono display, 8MHz 68000,
1MB RAM, 40MB HDD; I preferred to run it on the SE/30s and IIfx the
department had, but I couldn't take one of those home with me). 40
minutes for a LaTeXing run is what I recall for the last big document I
did with that rig. That's slow. The Performa 475 I got later on could
do LaTeXing at non-glacial speed, but that was with its 25MHz 68LC040
CPU. What CPUs do we have now?
I would say that all modern Macs are *VERY* fast and have large
monitors, even the laptops - all modern Macs have more than enough power
for doing any TeX jobs in such a short time that you shouldn't ever be
bothered by the wait.
The advantage of a desktop rather than a laptop is that the desktop
ought to last longer - they're more robust, all other things being
equal. Some desktop Macs are more expandable than the laptops - that's
might be relevant.
I can't see any need for a monitor bigger than required to `Display
either the input text or the output file, but not both at the same
time'. What's the need for a huge monitor? The first place I used TeX
didn't even have a screen previewer available.
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
More information about the macostex-archives