[OS X TeX] R, paradigm to bring into the LaTeX world?
gerhardt at math.uni-heidelberg.de
Mon Oct 23 17:18:37 CEST 2006
I think that tex/latex will remain the principal software for writing
and publishing scientific papers and books, though I have to admit
that I should restrict my judgement to publishing in mathematics and
physics where I have experience and knowledge. Look at the preprint
arXiv which requires all papers to be submitted as tex or latex
files. I also don't know any publishing house for these areas which
doesn't require latex files from its authors, nor do I know
mathematicians, except rather old ones, who don't use tex or latex or
at least have a secretary using it.
The present organization of latex packages might seem to be chaotic
but I never had a problem with it in the past nor do I expect to have
one in the future. As usual there are bad, good and excellent
packages for a particular purpose, but we all know which one to pick
and be it by asking this list.
Looking up the documentation of a package has been discussed ad
nauseam in recent weeks and before, and for the benefit of the
proverbial newbies, who, as I understand, have to be spoon-fed by all
means, I recommend to incorporate some instructions either in
TeXShop's documentation or on the Mac-TeX page.
On Oct 23, 2006, at 15:58, Gerben Wierda wrote:
> What should happen IMO is that something large like the TeX Live
> group effort would integrate such improved functionality. This
> would amongst other things require tighter control of TeX packages,
> something that will be very difficult to achive. TeX packages are a
> chaos, license-, organization-, documentation-, installation- and
> other-wise. It will be impossible unless a dedicated effort is
> being made to shoehorn everything back into one paradigm. MiKTeX
> does this, but it requires a separate set up distribution that is
> manually maintained. teTeX was the same.
> Basically, I think that in the long run TeX will remain a niche
> thing with changes of going extinct (e.g. if Microsoft or
> OpenOffice create a "good enough" setup for Math and large
> projects) unless this serious effort is made. That, I am afraid,
> will require serious financial sponsorship as it will take many
> people a lot of time to accomplish this.
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
More information about the macostex-archives