[OS X TeX] Re: OT: Printer Just Died!
herbs at wideopenwest.com
Sun Oct 1 18:27:35 CEST 2006
On Sep 30, 2006, at 12:07 AM, david craig wrote:
> FWIW, as I've been eyeing my 13-year-old HP LaserJet 4ML chug
> slowly away into the sunset, I've kept my eye on the printers that
> folks whose needs line up pretty well with my own seem happy with.
> (Source include groups like mac-l, iomug, oztex, this list, and so
> *MY* needs are a B&W postscript laser printer with minimum 600 dpi
> resolution, ethernet-networkable, preferably built-in duplex.
> I've been strongly inclined toward replacing the HP with an HP,
> since mine and the numerous others I've worked with in professional
> environments have seemed near invulnerable in high-volume printing
> environments. However, as far as I can tell from the above-
> mentioned sources, HP quality control went through a rocky patch a
> few years ago, and I really don't know whether it has recovered to
> its former greatness. I admit I've read enough grousing that I've
> become wary of consumer HP lasers. I *DO* know that in a couple of
> years worth of watching [that 4ML just wouldn't die!], while other
> printers have received positive reviews, the one name that has come
> up over and over again with overwhelmingly positive reviews among
> users with similar needs to mine has been Brother. So much so that
> when my little 4ML *finally* kicked up its litte rollers this past
> weekend, when I walked into the store and saw a Brother 5250DN
> sitting there I didn't hesitate to pick it up and walk to the
> register. 1200 dpi, 30 ppm, built-in duplex, built-in ethernet and
> USB ports, 32 MB built-in [upgradeable to 544], postscript
> [emulated, but I've not found that to be an issue with anyone I've
> asked] -- all for a little over $200.
> Of course, I can't yet speak to the reliability issue based on any
> personal experience. Time will tell...
> David Craig
I finally got my list down to the HP 1320n and the Brother HL-5250DN.
Given that there is 1/2 the price and the toner cartridges are also
considerably cheaper (per page printed) the Brother has won out.
I had to add the driver from the CD and also did an update to it from
the net. Setting up was fairly trivial because of built-in zero
So far it's been quite wonderful---but it's been a very short run.
I'm running it at 600dpi and it's very fast. Watching it gobble up
the paper and then spit it out when doing duplex is rather amusing.
It's a bit noisier and considerably taller than my old Personal
LaserWriter 320 but not too much so.
(herbs at wideopenwest.com)
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
More information about the macostex-archives