[OS X TeX] TeXShop-2.10beta
Gerben.Wierda at rna.nl
Mon Jun 5 23:02:22 CEST 2006
On Jun 5, 2006, at 13:35, Maarten Sneep wrote:
> On 5 Jun 2006, at 11:57, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>> Am 05.06.2006 um 01:22 schrieb Richard Koch:
>>> A beta release of TeXShop 2.10 can be obtained at
>> The engines can be made 'universal' by letting them invoke
>> /usr/local/teTeX/bin/`uname -p`-apple-darwin-current/<utility> or by
>> extending the search path with /usr/local/teTeX/bin/`uname
> Somehow, I think these instructions to build a fat^H^H^HUniversal
> binary will give a more user friendly experience.
> From what I can see: all Jonathan has to do is
> lipo -arch i386 /usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-apple-darwin-current/xetex \
> -arch ppc
> /usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current/xetex \
> -create -output xetex
> to create a new fat binary.
> Now, it seems that gwTeX uses separate binaries at the moment, and
> simply adds the correct architecture to the path, rather than letting
> the OS figure things out at run-time.
I follow TeX Live standards. I could produce fat binaries for TeX of
course, but that would remove the choice for downloading only one
architecture (in expert mode of the TeX i-package)
> I don't know how the rest of TeX is handled (in TeXShop), but it seems
> to me that XeTeX and gwTeX should be treated as similarly as possible.
> A loger term solution that I can see is to (eventually) create a
> universal set of tools.
It is a difficult problem. Having universal binaries is easier for Dick
but removes the download-only-what-you-need option.
What is the community's opinion?
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
More information about the macostex-archives