additional texmf tree for all users (was Re: [OS X TeX] Beginner help with TeXshop/MacTex needed)
Gerben.Wierda at rna.nl
Sun Aug 27 23:33:39 CEST 2006
On Aug 27, 2006, at 12:02 , Rowland McDonnell wrote:
> My reasons are very straightforward, very
> clear, and I'm amazed that so many people have such difficulty
> understanding that it's much easier to manage your own additions when
> they're in a single, segregated directory tree.
I agree that that is a good idea and it may be confusing that some i-
Packages write their TeX additions in texmf.local (like the ConTeXt
updater). That way, texmf.local is not really your *personal* system-
wide tree anymore.
The situation grew like this because the philosophy of i-Installer is
that it replaces handwork you might have to do yourself. E.g. if you
download ConTeXt from pragma in the zip form and have to install it
in the system wide texmf.local tree. The ConTeXt updater i-Package is
just a convenient way of doing that. Still, peopl tend to see
something like i-Installer as a closed system and as such it should
leave anything alone it does not own. i-Installer instead thinks of
your system dirctories as not being exlusively owned, but as
something many programs (installers, or even handwork from sources)
may work upon.
I have been thinking in having another texmf tree which in prcedence
lies between texmf.gwtex and texmf.local (texmf.gwextra), but given
that I have to reorganize everything because teTeX as a separate
distribution is dead, I have put that off. Still, I think the next
reorg will make sure that texmf.local is *really* local.
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
More information about the macostex-archives