[OS X TeX] Re: dvipdf vs. dvipdfm vs. dvipdfmx
stephenmoye at cox.net
Sun Nov 27 22:43:05 CET 2005
On Nov 27, 2005, at 2:15 PM, Bruno Voisin wrote:
> Le 27 nov. 05 à 19:29, Arthur Snoke a écrit :
>> Also, in this recent thread I saw mention about the Mac ps2pdf.
>> Is it superior to the ps2pdf which comes with ghostscript?
> Beware: the Apple distiller is called pstopdf, not ps2pdf. In
> summary, you have:
> - pstopdf, actually /usr/bin/pstopdf: Apple's built-in distiller
> (starting with Panther).
> - ps2pdf, actually /usr/local/bin/ps2pdf: Ghostscript's distiller.
> - epstopdf, actually /usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-
> current/epstopdf: teTeX's distiller (for EPS files only, and
> calling ps2pdf internally).
> Re. you question: I saw files which ps2pdf couldn't process while
> pstopdf could; and I also saw files which pstopdf couldn't process
> while ps2pdf could.
> Generally, I would recommend ps2pdf: ps2pdf produces compressed PDF
> output by default, while pstopdf doesn't. Hence, when the PDF files
> are included in a (La)TeX document as figures, say, and these
> figures have been created with pstopdf, then the compression of
> these figures in the final PDF output is redone every time the (La)
> TeX file is processed, taking up quite some time in some cases; on
> the other hand, with ps2pdf, the compression has been done once and
> for good, and won't be repeated.
So far, I seem to prefer epstopdf because it seem to produce a pdf
that is cropped to the same size as the eps. So far I have not found
the proper incantation to make ps2pdf do the same thing -- any
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
More information about the macostex-archives