[OS X TeX] Crossrefs in BibDesk?
macplanet at macnews.de
Wed May 18 19:31:42 CEST 2005
Am 18.05.2005 um 18:50 schrieb Adam Maxwell:
> In BibDesk, you can start enter the fields that are unique to a
> particular entry, then drag and drop the parent crossref'd entry
> onto the editor window; this will overwrite the empty fields. So
> the savings in data entry isn't a compelling argument for me,
> especially since this makes your file more readable, portable, and
> immune to sorting problems.
This is nice, definitely, but still: Crossrefs are not just something
that makes managing your .bib file easier, but they are a BibTeX
feature. I would not like to lose the feature which automatically
puts referencing and referenced items to the bibliography (see my
answer to Cifton).
I can absolutely understand your "don't waste time to implement
something nobody will use" point.
And, as I had pointed out before, it is possible to use BibDesk with
crossrefs reasonably well. (The sorting problem is partly solved if
you enter the referenced item (i.e. the book) before the referencing
item (the inbook); since BibDesk seems to append new items to the top
of the file, this automatically causes the items to appear in the
>> Per Matthias's comment about sort order: Since cross-references make
>> the dependencies explicit, it would be feasible to automatically sort
>> so that referenced items appear after referencing items (assuming no
>> cycles in the referencing graph).
> I think sorting is the most challenging part of the problem,
> really; you're suggesting that BibDesk do something that BibTeX
> itself can't do! I appreciate the discussion and comments. Curt,
> if you could add yours to the RFE, I'd appreciate it.
BibTeX can't, but tools like Bibtool can.
Unfortunately nobody from the developers has commented on my idea to
simply provide Bibtool with the information it needs to perform the
If I see this correctly, it was enough, if some "CrossrefSearchOrder
= x" line could be appended to each item in the .bib file, with x
being 1 for all inbook, incollection and inproceedings items, and 2
for each book, proceedings etc. items.
Wouldn't that be a rather minor change?
If BibTeX could even call Bibtool with the appropriate options on the
file, this would solve the problem in a rather simple way, imho.
(Bibtool is available as an i-Installer package, so you can assume it
to be or get installed on every MacOS X system.)
If the Title/Booktitle problem was solved as well, I personally was
totally happy ...
mad at macpla.net
PGP key: http://macpla.net/MatthiasDamm.asc
PGP fingerprint: CED3 6074 7F7D 3148 C6F3 DFF2 05FF 3A0B 0D12 4D41
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the macostex-archives