[OS X TeX] Semi-OT
Will Robertson
will at guerilla.net.au
Sat Jan 22 17:01:38 CET 2005
On 23 Jan 2005, at 2:21 AM, Bruno Voisin wrote:
> That said, personally I disagree with this rule, which seems to date
> back to the time when the concept of environmental awareness was not
> invented: wasting all this amount of paper on each page seems a shame.
> Generally first thing I do when creating a new LaTeX document is
> resetting the margins to 1 inch on all sides, whatever the character
> size.
I agree that it's a waste of paper, but I also agree with the experts
who say that it's ugly to do this. One day I'm going to make a two
column landscape layout with very small margins for the purpose of
saving trees as well as being typographically acceptable.
> There are a number of typographical rules in the LaTeX manual that I
> disagree with, like the recommendation to use numbered references
> instead of author-date ones. Try to read a paper of each type: with
> numbered references, even when having some prior knowledge of the
> literature referred to, you are all the time interrupting your reading
> of the paper to move to the list of references so as to identify which
> publication is referred to; with author-date references, and provided
> you have some familiarity with the literature, then reading the author
> and date is sufficient to know which publication is referred to,
> without having to move to the list of references.
Oh god yes. What's worse is when you read sentences like "and it was
claimed in [45] that such-and-such" or "[3] claimed something else".
Yeah, I don't understand people's opposition towards author-date bib
styles. They seem to make heaps more sense to me...
W
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list