[OS X TeX] input versus include in Texshop

[Maarten Sneep]

On 5 jan 2005, at 19:00, David Arnold wrote:

(snip)

We took the matter off list, but I don't get it. I have the most recent 
version of pdfsync (31st of January last year, version 0.6), but even 
on the most basic test file I cannot get it to work between TeXniscope 
and BBEdit (using the shell and AppleScript script snippet provided by 
TeXniscope). With one of my other files (much more complicated than 
this one), this works more or less OK.

I'd say this is the minimal sample that should work regardless, but the 
master.pdfsync file seems way too short to me. I'm not getting any 
further, other than that the pdfsync package seems to miss a lot of 
paragraphs (but it does get some within the \inputted file).

I don't see anything that would mess with pdfsync in polking or pex, 
nothing at least that goes beyond this bare sample.

Is anyone aware of recent changes to LaTeXs internals (\@@par in 
particular) that may have thown off pdfsync? Other changes in the last 
year? I'm running TL2005 (This is pdfeTeXk, Version 
3.141592-1.20b-rc5-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.3) (format=pdflatex 2005.1.4)).

Maarten

\documentclass{article}
%\usepackage[empty]{polking}
%\usepackage{pex}
%\input{bookmacros}

\usepackage{pdfsync}

\begin{document}
\section{blah}

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aliquam ac
. . .

\input{exer}

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aliquam ac
. . .

\end{document}

with exer.tex containing a similar Lorem ... phrase (about 6 paragraphs 
worth of garbage).

--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
           & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>