[OS X TeX] Replace LaTeX????

Jon Crump jjcrump at u.washington.edu
Fri Feb 11 20:25:13 CET 2005

... And what's more, I've always considered the greatest advantage of a 
typesetting program is the two tiered process of editing. The first time 
through _should_ look messy: that's because it _is_. WYSIWYG editors 
obscure this fact by making it seem like your first draft is ready to 
publish, which it _isn't_.

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Claus Gerhardt wrote:

> The tex source is not intended for reading but only for compiling. Human 
> reading is only required for editing. I therefore have to admit that I don't 
> understand this discussion.
J.J. Crump
Dept. of History 353560
University of Washington
Seattle, WA. 98195

--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
           & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>

More information about the macostex-archives mailing list