[OS X TeX] $MANPATH (again??)
Bruno Voisin
bvoisin at mac.com
Thu Aug 11 19:14:38 CEST 2005
Le 11 août 05 à 17:16, Gerben Wierda a écrit :
> My manpath config file contains
>
> MANPATH /usr/local/share/man
> MANPATH /usr/local/man
>
> as well as
>
> MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
>
> and as a result finds all man pages both in /usr/local/man and /usr/
> local/share/man
>
> Did I change my manpath config a while back of is this standard.
> Because if it is, the symlink is not needed.
I must admit I don't fully understand how things work (in Tiger). I
didn't customize anything (only Tiger + i-Packages). I don't have any
MANPATH set ("echo $MANPATH" in Terminal returns a blank line). PATH
is the default, modified by the GS and TeX i-Packages:
legimc11:~ brunovoisin$ echo $PATH
/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/teTeX/
bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current
In /usr/share.misc.conf, there is:
MANPATH /usr/share/man
MANPATH /usr/local/share/man
MANPATH /usr/X11R6/man
then later:
MANPATH_MAP /bin /usr/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /sbin /usr/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/bin /usr/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/sbin /usr/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/sbin /usr/local/share/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/X11R6/bin /usr/X11R6/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/bin/X11 /usr/X11R6/man
MANPATH_MAP /usr/bin/mh /usr/share/man
and finally, as added when installing the TeX i-Package:
MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/teTeX/bin/powerpc-apple-darwin-current /
usr/local/teTeX/man
But now, in Terminal, here's what I get:
legimc11:~ brunovoisin$ manpath
/usr/share/man:/usr/local/teTeX/man:/usr/X11R6/man
Namely /usr/local/share/man, which according to man.conf should be
there, is missing. Is this because this directory doesn't exist
(there /usr/local/share/, but no man/ inside)?
If man.conf is edited manually, by adding the line:
MANPATH /usr/local/man
then the path is indeed modified:
legimc11:~ brunovoisin$ manpath
/usr/share/man:/usr/local/teTeX/man:/usr/X11R6/man:/usr/local/man
and "man convert" works as expected.
But I would have believed the modification wasn't necessary: if we
are to believe what the comments in man.conf say:
# If people ask for "man foo" and have "/dir/bin/foo" in their PATH
# and the docs are found in "/dir/man", then no mapping is
required.
then, provided a binary program is in /usr/local/bin/, a man page
inside /usr/local/man/ should be found automatically (I verified the
NOAUTOPATH flag is indeed commented out in man.conf). Which should
apply, in particular, to "convert".
Is there something broken, or did I just misunderstood?
Bruno Voisin--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list