[OS X TeX] new AMSLaTeX + bug fix
Alexandru Scorpan
ascorpan at math.ufl.edu
Sun Oct 17 13:29:03 CEST 2004
> did you get an acknowledgement from the ams support
> people?
I have no recollection, it's been a while.
> the release would have been under-way at the time your report came in,
> and to add frank's patch (or simply to remove the buggy code so as to
> use the working latex default) would have required restarting the
> regression testing.
No complaints. I just felt chattery today.
> fortunate it's such a counter-intuitive bug, isn't it?
I am proud to report that I have seen a few papers on the arXiv which
suddenly had an oversized footnote mark.
I'd argue that it's not even that hard to run into it in real life:
Just draw a picture directly in LaTeX and label something there by
changing sizes, as in:
\documentclass[12pt]{amsart}
\begin{document}
\setcounter{footnote}{49}
Bug\footnote{whatever}
\begin{figure}
\begin{picture}(100,100)
\put(50,50){\Tiny $\Theta$}
\end{picture}
\end{figure}
\setcounter{footnote}{49}
Bug\footnote{ooops}
\end{document}
I'd rather say: Fortunate that it's usually not very visible. Or that
people don't draw many pictures in their papers...
-- Alex
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list