[OS X TeX] iInstaller and manually installed components
Peter Dyballa
Peter_Dyballa at Web.DE
Tue Nov 30 17:13:26 CET 2004
Am 30.11.2004 um 12:32 schrieb Enrico Franconi:
I believe that people did not understand the importance of the argument
of Martin. The point is about *management* of libraries, i.e., update
or removal, for which the i-installer philosophy is completely
inadequate;
And because of this we should be glad to be able to use so much
software that does not have to come with an i-Installer.
As Gerben wrote: there is a core set that is necessary and that he
takes much care of. And there is some paraphernalia. It's our choice,
*we* decide what this can come from, we can make any changes. And we
can learn from the mistakes we do make ...
It might be a good idea to supply a document with descriptions on how
to handle different mixed situations that the others don't have to
repeat our mistakes. I just stopped at some point the installation of
the extra i-Packages, checked my system and Fink, and decided to try it
my way adding libwmf and Imagemagick too (?). And after a new start the
i-Installer was (almost) satisfied!
Sometimes I do like to be responsible, to find out dependencies and
inadequacies. Later I'll have a long time laying comfortably in my
grave.
--
Greetings
Pete
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list