[OS X TeX] Re: Who should use (La)TeX - who is able to use it?
Gerben Wierda
Gerben.Wierda at rna.nl
Mon Nov 15 21:15:01 CET 2004
On 15 Nov 2004, at 14:23, Gary L. Gray wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2004, at 11:49 PM, david craig wrote:
>
>>> Is a "normal" user generally capable to use LaTeX?
>>
>> As you describe a "normal" user, I think the answer is a categorical
>> "no". (Well ... "capable", typically yes; "willing" probably not.
>> Nor does it strike me as an especially good idea. What's the payoff
>> for the effort?)
>>
>> What would be the point, really? Such users already have tools that
>> serve them perfectly well, whatever their limitations for our crowd.
>> TeX is for people who need the level of control that it offers,
>> especially vis a vis mathematics.
>
> I would also argue (and I often do to students and colleagues) that
> one of the advantages of TeX is the stability and lack of frustrating
> bugs. I have written many papers (containing numerous figures and
> equations) in Word and its strange behavior and bugs (they may be
> features, but you will never convince me of that) made me pull my hair
> out (look at my picture on my web page and you will see). While TeX is
> not trivial to learn, its consistent behavior more than makes up for
> it.
Microsoft's own knowledge base make interesting reading on the many
problems you can encounter. One of the few things I always do when
cooperating on a Word document is make sure every participant has the
"fast save" preference turned off. There is no more certain way to
corrupt Word documents to the level that either the document or the
program becomes unusable. Fighting with Word over many issues is
sometimes extremely frustrating, probably as frustrating as TeX is for
others.
G
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list