[OS X TeX] Lucidabr and fontenc
Herb Schulz
herbs at wideopenwest.com
Thu Nov 4 04:36:49 CET 2004
On 11/3/04 9:20 PM, "Cameron Hooper" <chooper at umich.edu> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have just switched over to a Mac and have a question about the Lucida
> Bright fonts. I have installed the fonts, run texhash and run the
> following commands as suggested in a post I found in the archives for
> this list.
>
> sudo updmap --enable Map lucidabr-k.map
> sudo updmap --enable Map lumath-k.map
>
> Everything works fine. However, I have to include the line
>
> \usepackage[LY1]{fontenc}
>
> in order for the fonts to work. If I don't \usepackage{lucidabr} does
> not work. It does not produce an error, but the output is in computer
> modern. If I use the older \usepackage{lucidbry} command then I do not
> need to use the fontenc package. I have used the fonts for a number of
> years on both Linux and Windows and have never had to use fontenc before.
>
> So I am curious about this difference. Is this standard behaviour for
> LaTeX on Macs? Or does it point to some mistake I've made when
> installing the fonts that is likely to give me grief later on?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Cameron
Howdy,
I've used the lucidabr.map and lucmath.map with T1 encoding and the Berry
Font Names. Or try the lucidabr-o.map and lucmath-o.map for non-Berry font
names. Great font, I use it all the time.
Good Luck,
Herb Schulz
(herbs at wideopenwest.com)
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list