[OS X TeX] Various TeX programs on Mac
Jérôme Laurens
jerome.laurens at u-bourgogne.fr
Fri May 7 13:06:03 CEST 2004
Le 7 mai 04, à 12:21, m a écrit :
>
> Am 07.05.2004 um 10:09 schrieb Jérôme Laurens:
>
>> 2 - write a new app, with the minimal user interface, something like
>> TextEdit + a View menu à la preview.app, a TeX menu, pdf windows,
>> terminal windows.
>> In the TeX menu, there should only be
>> - a typeset menu item
>> - items for standard examples (using the included poor man
>> distribution only), for sectionning, fonts, maths, graphics, all in
>> different read only tex files.
>> - some templates
>>
>> Maybe one button in the text editor window to typeset...
>
> Quick hack:
>
> <http://www.das-dock.de/TeXinOne.jpg>
>
> Really, *quick*, haven't given the interface -- especially buttons and
> such -- much thought (I'm too busy getting another app out).
>
> But what confused ME a lot when I started with TeXShop were all those
> different windows and the fact that all I saw first was en *empty*
> document.
So no empty doc in the application delegate
> I didn't know what would happen when I hit "Typeset", didn't know that
> another window would pop up with the finished pdf, where the pdf went
> when I closed the editor, what all these files were that were put next
> to my document, and so on.
display a (one shot) panel explaining briefly what will occur.
>
> By integrating typesetting and preview in one window and optionally
> hiding the console, one can actually see how things are
> interconnected. It's much closer to an actual typesetting job.
if you only edit one file after the other, this problem does not occur.
There is also the trick of the windows menu: order it a la xcode to
gather related windows
>
> This *may* go a bit against the "one document needs one
> window"-guideline, but let's face it: Beginners most certainly don't
> fully understand the fact that input and output are seperated *that
> much*. Especially when one gives examples a la "it's like HTML", since
> HTML is one file, and one file only -- it only gets interpreted
> differently depending on the app you're in (editor, viewer).
1 - we need not follow this guideline if necessary
2 - We can consider the source and the pdf as 2 views of the same
document.
3 - The main problem is that merging the two views in one window is not
good for small screen
>
> This concept would work pretty well with the idea of packaged
> tex-docs, and would also work *very* well with the ideas of "click on
> the pdf and jump to that place in the source". And if the pdf-view is
> set up "intelligent" enough to, for example, also allow for page-jumps
> depending on which line I'm in in the editor,
this is not difficult (iTeXMac does this, it is TeXtures "follow focus")
-----------------------------------------------------
Please see <http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/> for list
guidelines, information, and LaTeX/TeX resources.
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list