[OS X TeX] Fourier and amsart

[Richard Seguin]

Bruno,

I added \usepackage{bm}, and now when \usepackage{fourier} is invoked, 
both $\bm{\beta)$ and $\bm(T)$ are typeset as bold italic. 
Interestingly, \usepackage{bm} also seems to modify the behavior of 
\boldsymbol so that now both $\boldsymbol{\beta)$ and $\boldsymbol(T)$ 
also are typeset as bold italic. Without the bm package, these last two 
were rendered as non-bold italic.

You've solved my problem! Thanks!

Richard Séguin

On Jun 28, 2004, at 2:13 AM, Bruno Voisin wrote:

> Le 28 juin 04, à 04:38, Richard Seguin a écrit :
>
>> However, using Fourier, $\mathbf{T}$ is bold, but is upright, and 
>> $\boldsymbol{T}$ is not bold, but is italic.
>
> This is normal behaviour. \mathbf allows to use the text bold font in 
> maths, in other words it produces in maths the same output as does 
> \textbf in text; hence the upright result.
>
> \boldsymbol, from the amsbsy package (deprecated in favour of bm), and 
> \bm, from the bm package, do something different: they select bold 
> maths fonts, provided these fonts are available. In other words they 
> take the (italic) math symbol you are asking for, look for a bold 
> version of it, and, if it's available, pick it up; if it's not, they 
> apparently revert to the non-bold version. Both \boldsymbol and \bm 
> aim at providing more practical and extensive variants of LaTeX's 
> original \boldmath.
>
> Bruno Voisin
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
> Please see <http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/> for list
> guidelines, information, and LaTeX/TeX resources.
>
>

-----------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
Please see <http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/> for list
guidelines, information, and LaTeX/TeX resources.