[OS X TeX] LaTeX -> Word?
Thomas Schröder
hydrochlorix at gmx.net
Tue Apr 20 09:28:09 CEST 2004
Am 20.04.2004 um 04:44 schrieb Robert Kerstetter:
Hi Robert,
>> So, thanks for the tip but I guess, latex2rtf is not for me.
>
> Try TeX4ht
>
> htlatex filename "html,4,1"
>
> this should create a single filename.html document, plus another doc
> with the footnotes.
Ah, well, I already tried that. (I said so, when I started this thread)
> it converts images
But not in great quality. I know that you can instruct tex4ht to
produce images in higher resolution, but then I get really big images
in Word which I'll have to reduce in size again. I actually even wrote
a macro to do this for me automatically, but because this is Word we're
talking about here it doesn't work all the time... :-(
> and equations (but i don't do math, so have not first-hand experience)
Equations suck big time doing it like this. They get turned into images
which are not editable in Word, so it's kind of pointless.
> If you have open office, try TeX4ht's:
>
> oolatex filename
>
> converts to oo's xml format.
>
> open in oo and save as word.
I also tried this (which I also mentioned in my first post). The thing
is that OpenOffice completely messes up the equations and the images.
Equations become very small clickable boxes containing white space only
and images are simply left out. For pure text without images it works
rather nicely, but for that I wouldn't need to bother going through the
lengthier process using OpenOffice, I could directly import the simpler
html file into Word. I was curious wether this was a Mac problem
because I've been hearing so many good things about the OpenOffice
route, so I installed MikTeX, tex4ht and OpenOffice on Windows at work,
but I got the same results there.
Bye, Thomas
-----------------------------------------------------
Please see <http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/> for list
guidelines, information, and LaTeX/TeX resources.
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list