[Mac OS X TeX] Re: [0ff-topic] Matlab and Mac OS X
Arun Mangalam
arun_mangalam at mac.com
Mon Oct 1 21:34:16 CEST 2001
<x-flowed>Wow! That's pretty insightful information on the Mathworks situation. i
guess I won't wait anymore.
However, there are two open-source alternatives that apparently compile
on the Mac: Octave and SciLab. Here's a URL to the MacOSX compilations:
http://homepage.mac.com/persquare/
I think SciLab even has a new MultiFractal and Wavelet toolbox added.
Anyway, both Octave and SciLab read in MatLab files, I believe. I think
it would be nice if more people started to use one the packages, and
start to contribute in a beautiful open-source native OSX scientific
package. I guess those are my dreams .. :)
Otherwise, there is, of course, OSX native Mathematica for
symbolic/signal processing capabilities, and LabVIEW should be releasing
an OSX version in the near future as they are in the internal beta test
stage [they have a PID toolbox].
I just find that mathworks loses millions to these other companies.
- Arun
On Monday, October 1, 2001, at 02:44 PM, Dave McCollum wrote:
> John,
>
> Thanks for the MatLab update.
>
> I can add some info to this... our Apple Higher Ed rep on campus has
> told me that The Mathworks has lost the main core of "original"
> developers (Mac and Windows) over the past few years. Consequently,
> they are adding features to
> MatLab via ActiveX components and other "add on" techniques, in effect
> patching on new features. So, the code base is getting really messy.
> From all accounts, MatLab is due for a major overhaul, which The
> Mathworks is hesitating to do. So, to create a Mac OS X version, either
> Carbon or full Cocoa, would not be trivial, due to recent changes to
> the MatLab codebase, as well as the lack of people with intimate
> knowledge of the codebase, especially on the Mac side.
>
> Since MatLab is a major/popular scientific/engineering app for the Mac
> OS, Apple tried to encourage The Mathworks to make a new Mac OS port
> (for OS 9 or OS X only, or both). This encouragement included
> substantial financial incentives and offers of "manpower." So far, The
> Mathworks has not expressed any interest in the offers....
>
> Oh well, I guess that the MatLab users among us will have to use it in
> OS 9 or Classic. Classic performance of MatLab 5.2.1 is 90% or better,
> except for graphics support.
>
>
>
> -Dave
>
>
>> All,
>> I know this is off-topic, but as scientists on the Mac are major
>> uses of
>> both TeX and Matlab, and the issue was raised on this list, I thought
>> it was
>> still appropriate.
>> As I do routinely since The Mathworks stopped developing Matlab for
>> the
>> mac, I wrote once again to The Mathworks to seek re-development,
>> especially
>> for Mac OS X 10.1. My comments included the suggestion made here
>> (i.e., on
>> this list) that re-development should much easier for OS X because it
>> is
>> essentially 'nix at its core. I thought I'd share the response I
>> received:
>>
>>> This is in response to Case ID: 688201
>>>
>>> Dear Dr. John Vokey:
>>>
>>> MATLAB is not supported under Mac OS X.
>>>
>>> As we do with all unsupported platforms, we will continually monitor
>>> the
>>> marketplace to see whether we should consider support for OS X. At
>>> the
>>> current time we do not have any plans or timeframe for supporting OS
>>> X.
>>>
>>> While we are aware of the similarities and differences between OS X
>>> and
>>> other Unix-based systems that we currently support (including issues
>>> related to POSIX compliance, window managers, OpenGL support, number
>>> crunching ability, etc), making a decision to support MATLAB on
>>> additional
>>> platforms involves analyzing trends in industrial and educational
>>> sectors
>>> to ensure that our resources are allocated in the best way possible
>>> for the
>>> entire MATLAB community.
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Natasha Niedzwiecki
>>> Product and Pricing Team
>>
>> --
>> Freedom of religion includes freedom from religion.
>>
>> John R. Vokey, Ph.D.
>> Professor
>> Department of Psychology and Neuroscience
>> University of Lethbridge
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
>> "unsubscribe macosx-tex" (no quotes) in the body.
>> For additional HELP, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
>> "help" (no quotes) in the body.
>> This list is not moderated, and I am not responsible for
>> messages posted by third parties.
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
> "unsubscribe macosx-tex" (no quotes) in the body.
> For additional HELP, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
> "help" (no quotes) in the body.
> This list is not moderated, and I am not responsible for
> messages posted by third parties.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
"unsubscribe macosx-tex" (no quotes) in the body.
For additional HELP, send email to <info at email.esm.psu.edu> with
"help" (no quotes) in the body.
This list is not moderated, and I am not responsible for
messages posted by third parties.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
</x-flowed>
More information about the macostex-archives
mailing list