[lucida] lucida, sudden doubt

[Vic Norton]

No, Enrico. I don't do TeX outside of TeXShop.  - Vic

On Dec 9, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Enrico Bernardi wrote:

> Hi Vic
> 
> thanks for the reply. If I typeset lucida-sample.tex within TeXShop and look at the output of its console, I also do not get anything, and the only reference I see is like yours.
> But I am typesetting either via Aquamacs or he command line. And then alas I see these not available warnings, pretty annoying. Did you check outside TeXShop?
> 
> Thanks
> Enrico
> On Dec 9, 2010, at 9:03 AM, lucida-request at tug.org wrote:
> 
>> Send lucida mailing list submissions to
>> 	lucida at tug.org
>> 
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> 	http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/lucida
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> 	lucida-request at tug.org
>> 
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> 	lucida-owner at tug.org
>> 
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of lucida digest..."
>> 
>> 
>> Today's Topics:
>> 
>>  1. Re: sudden doubt (Vic Norton)
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:03:31 -0500
>> From: Vic Norton <vic at norton.name>
>> To: Enrico Bernardi <enrico.bernardi at gmail.com>
>> Cc: TeXnical discussion of the Lucida fonts <lucida at tug.org>
>> Subject: Re: [lucida] sudden doubt
>> Message-ID: <443E4102-8625-4752-BD76-6E4076D48C8C at norton.name>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> 
>> Hi Enrico,
>> 
>> I use the complete Lucida font set from TUG. When I compile "lucida-sample.tex" with TeXShop (Mac), I see no such lines in my log. The string "hlcw" only occurs in the following paragraph:
>> 
>> Overfull \hbox (14.3266pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 290--290
>> \T1/hlh/m/n/10.95 LucidaCalligraphy- 
>> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/latex/lucida/t1hlce.fd)
>> Overfull \hbox (19.29813pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 293--293
>> \T1/hlh/m/n/10.95 LucidaHandwriting- 
>> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/latex/lucida/t1hlcw.fd) [6]
>> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/latex/lucida/t1hlcf.fd) [7]
>> (./lucida-sample.aux) )
>> 
>> Apparently your Lucida font implementation is a lot different than mine.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Vic
>> 
>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Enrico Bernardi wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I have been using the Lucida fonts for a while to my general
>>> satisfaction and without too much exploring the logs. For some reason
>>> today, typesetting the lucida-sample.tex from
>>> http://tug.org/store/lucida/samples.html I decided to take a closer
>>> look at lucida-sample.log.
>>> 
>>> Here is what I find a bit suspicious in the log, a complete output of
>>> which I post below:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> LaTeX Font Info:    Font shape `T1/hlcw/m/n' in size <10.95> not available
>>> (Font)              Font shape `T1/hlcw/m/it' tried instead on input line 293.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Is it normal?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Also typesetting lucida-oneline-samples.tex from the same web-site I
>>> get in the log:
>>> 
>>> LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `T1/hls/bf/n' undefined
>>> (Font)              using `T1/hls/m/n' instead on input line 87.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Do I have to worry about my installation? Everything takes place in
>>> Mac OS X, TexLive-2010-64 distribution and the fonts bought maybe 6
>>> months ago.
>>> 
>>> Also one further question: I usually put in the preamble
>>> 
>>> \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
>>> \usepackage[expert,vargreek,altbullet]{lucidabr}
>>> 
>>> while in the lucida-sample.tex we have:
>>> 
>>> % use Lucida fonts for both text and math.
>>> \usepackage[altbullet]{lucidabr}     % get larger bullet
>>> \DeclareEncodingSubset{TS1}{hlh}{1}  % including \oldstylenums
>>> 
>>> Where could I read some explanation about the difference between the
>>> two declarations?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you
>>> 
>>> Enrico