[luatex] handling resolution of jpg files
David Carlisle
d.p.carlisle at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 10:30:46 CET 2017
Thanks for that, I realise that in general there is no way to win in all
cases, but if gradually all systems lose in the same way then in the end
it's less confusing for the users:-)
I'll rebuild and try those test files later,
David
On 23 January 2017 at 09:24, luigi scarso <luigi.scarso at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:03 AM, David Carlisle <d.p.carlisle at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Luigi,
> >
> >> So in luatex we have a width of 243pixels at 72dpi, hence 243.91125pt.
> >
> >> On the other side pdftex takes the other way, so we have 243pixels at
> > 120dpi, hence 146.34676pt.
> >
> > I think that's an unfortunate choice and ask you to at least give a
> > customisation
> > option to take the other choice.
>
> > https://github.com/latex3/graphics-def/blob/master/
> testfiles/clip-1-2.jpg
> > https://github.com/latex3/graphics-def/blob/master/
> testfiles/clip-1-2.png
> thank you for the png --- this shows that I could use the Exif
> 0x5110 , Exif 0x5111 and Exif 0x5112
> to set the resolution of the jpeg.
> Exif 0x5110 : 1
> Exif 0x5111 : 4724
> Exif 0x5112 : 4724
> means 4724pixel/1m = 119.989 pixel/in which ~120dpi
> (of course Exif 0x5110 (ie PixelUnit) can be different from Exif
> ResolutionUnit , so we have the same problem).
>
> The png is correct simply because there is a single field for the x
> resolution (and one for the y resolution)
> so no ambiguity.
> But there is no a standard way to convert jpeg exif tags into png chunks.
>
> I have just commited a new writejpg.w, with some changes:
> if there is an Exif header with a standard xres, yres and a valid unit
> (which can be omitted and it's taken as inch)
> then it wins over the input resolution.
> We support now also the Exif 0x5110, 0x5111, 0x5112 (used by MicroSoft
> ?) but only if the unit is correct.
> A warning is emitted if the input resolution is different from the
> Exif resolution , or if xres=1 or yres=1,
> or if the Exif resolutions looks bad.
> In short: we use the Exif resolution if it's valid .
>
>
> --
> luigi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/luatex/attachments/20170123/a5ade11e/attachment.html>
More information about the luatex
mailing list