[luatex] Minor formatting bugs in output
Joseph Wright
joseph.wright at morningstar2.co.uk
Sat May 24 17:23:49 CEST 2014
Hello all,
Setting up some tests which use log file differences, I've run across a
few oddities with LuaTeX. These may or may not be bugs: what I'm after
is status on them. (All tested with an up-to-date TL2014 pretest, luatex
executable.)
First one is the 'more help text for something like:
\def\foo{#1}
which with LuaTeX reads:
You meant to type ## instead of #, right?
Or maybe a } was forgotten somewhere earlier, and things
are all screwed up? I''m going to assume that you meant ##.
Notice the extra "'" in "I'm" on on the last line. Clear bug, I think :-)
The second one is
\immediate\write0{\the\foo}
where if we scroll down the log a bit we get
! Forbidden control sequence found while scanning text of \write.
<inserted text>
}
<to be read again>
\endwrite
<inserted text> }\endwrite
l.5 \immediate\write0{\the\foo}
?
0
! Missing { inserted.
<to be read again>
The difference this time is a space: with pdfTeX/XeTeX that "0" has a
space after it, but with LuaTeX it doesn't. No idea if this is deliberate!
Third one is more serious or at least surprising:
\expandafter\show\csname foo#\endcsname
gives
> \foo##=\relax.
<recently read> \foo##
with LuaTeX but
> \foo#=\relax.
<recently read> \foo#
with pdfTeX/XeTeX. The pdfTeX behaviour allows for use of 'odd' catcodes
in csnames, whereas the LuaTeX behaviour means a test would be needed.
--
Joseph Wright
More information about the luatex
mailing list