[luatex] LuaTeX 0.76: problem with pdf_colorstack whatsit

Hans Hagen pragma at wxs.nl
Tue May 14 10:02:29 CEST 2013

On 5/13/2013 11:19 PM, Stephan Hennig wrote:
> Am 29.04.2013 20:12, schrieb Stephan Hennig:
>> Taco, is this change intentional?  It hasn't been announced in the
>> LuaTeX changelog.  Do I have to adapt my code (the change breaks the
>> spelling package) or will LuaTeX be fixed?
> Ping!
> Referring to field 'command' instead 'cmd' works.  I could test for the
> correct node field, but since node.has_field(n, 'cmd') returns true and
> node.has_field(n, 'command') returns false with LuaTeX 0.76, one needed
> to explicitly test for an error triggered by an assignment to either field.

> Do I need to add such an ugly test to my code or may we expect this to
> be fixed before TL2013 is released?

'command' is the right key (so the has_field list has to be adapted)

(fyi: around 0.75 node field access h as been cleaned up, normalized and 
made faster as well)


                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl

More information about the luatex mailing list