[luatex] LuaTeX 0.76: problem with pdf_colorstack whatsit
Hans Hagen
pragma at wxs.nl
Tue May 14 10:02:29 CEST 2013
On 5/13/2013 11:19 PM, Stephan Hennig wrote:
> Am 29.04.2013 20:12, schrieb Stephan Hennig:
>
>> Taco, is this change intentional? It hasn't been announced in the
>> LuaTeX changelog. Do I have to adapt my code (the change breaks the
>> spelling package) or will LuaTeX be fixed?
>
> Ping!
>
> Referring to field 'command' instead 'cmd' works. I could test for the
> correct node field, but since node.has_field(n, 'cmd') returns true and
> node.has_field(n, 'command') returns false with LuaTeX 0.76, one needed
> to explicitly test for an error triggered by an assignment to either field.
> Do I need to add such an ugly test to my code or may we expect this to
> be fixed before TL2013 is released?
'command' is the right key (so the has_field list has to be adapted)
(fyi: around 0.75 node field access h as been cleaned up, normalized and
made faster as well)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the luatex
mailing list