[luatex] Bug involving rubber lengths
heiko.oberdiek at googlemail.com
Tue Oct 19 17:23:53 CEST 2010
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:15:11PM +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Philipp Stephani wrote:
> > Am 19.10.2010 um 10:48 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
> >> On 10/19/2010 02:19 AM, Scott Pakin wrote:
> >>> Still, there seems to be a problem with the way that luatex handles
> >>> keywords like "fill" (which can contain varying numbers of l's).
> >> In luatex there are four explicit keywords:
> >> filll
> >> fill
> >> fil
> > That makes luatex incompatible with tex/pdftex/xetex because
> Yes, and it is already documented as such in the manual.
Addition for the manual for section "9.2 Changes from e-TeX 2.2":
* \gluestretchorder and \glueshrinkorder are changed because of
the new keyword "fi" from aleph. They are using
0 for pt, 1 for fi, 2 for fil, 3 for fill, 4 for filll.
(e-TeX uses 0 for pt, 1 for fil, 2 for fill, 3 for filll.)
More information about the luatex