[latexrefman] Layout of sectional units

[Vincent Belaïche]

Hello Jim,
While I have you at hand, please confirm that in English *a* in «
Otherwise you can get *a*
something like a subsection numbered @samp{3.0.1} » is a typo and has
to be removed.

  V.

Le sam. 5 sept. 2020 à 15:31, Vincent Belaïche
<vincent.belaiche at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > Please, will you make the change?
>
> Yes, I am at it.
>   V.
>
> > Thank you,
> > Jim
> >
> > ---------------
> > It is up to you: https://www.vote.org/
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Vincent Belaïche <vincent.belaiche at gmail.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2020 8:36
> > To: latexrefman; Hefferon, Jim S.
> > Subject: Layout of sectional units
> >
> > ⚠ External Sender ⚠
> >
> >
> > Dear Jim,
> >
> > With Karl's latest change I realised that your r649 was incompletely
> > propagated to the French version (notably the article template). I am
> > fixing this now, and that will be my last change before publishing the
> > French version to CTAN.
> >
> > Looking at 648->649 changes I saw that the title of \@startsection was
> > improved to « Layout of sectional units ».
> >
> > I think that the title is still not fully clear. What we speak about
> > here is not the layout of the unit itself but typesetting its heading.
> >
> > I propose to change this to « Typesetting sectional unit headings »,
> > what do you think?
> > In French it is easier because « rubrique » means firstly the
> > sectional unit heading, and only by metonymy the unit itself, so the
> > French would just be « Composer les rubriques » (rubrique is from
> > Latin rubrica = red earth, because sectional unit heading used to be
> > typeset in brick red color).
> >
> >   V.