[latexrefman] Under- and over-full lines

Hefferon, Jim S. jhefferon at smcvt.edu
Sat Jun 30 01:45:04 CEST 2018


> I also played around with the Command Line Options table in a way you
might not like ... I'll revert if you prefer.

I've been looking through the changes for something I could object to and I can't find it.  The single dashes before the option name?  At one time I read some people who wanted the dash to be a minus sign and mean the option is off; could it be that I read that?  Anyway, it is OK with me.   Were the dashes left off the shell escape options by accident?

> Looking at the indexes now, I really think we should merge them into
one.

Cool.

> I see the note about ltx-help.el using the node name "Command Index"; we
can leave an @anchor behind so it still works (or should), in case
anyone still cares about that.

OK.

Does anyone object if I put an @anchor before each parameter? That and adding lots of @noindent after the @end example's was my goal for tomorrow.  I hope to be able to link to the parameter because I imagine a texhax message that links directly to it.  If it is too much, that's OK.

Jim  

----------
https://i.redd.it/cmsrqy1olq611.jpg

________________________________________
From: latexrefman <latexrefman-bounces at tug.org> on behalf of Karl Berry <karl at freefriends.org>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 18:36
To: latexrefman at tug.org
Subject: Re: [latexrefman] Under- and over-full lines

    Except the index, which I don't see how to do.

I got rid of the two overfull lines in the index by changing the text.
I also played around with the Command Line Options table in a way you
might not like ... I'll revert if you prefer.

Looking at the indexes now, I really think we should merge them into
one. They have become so long (which is good :) that it is a drag to
look in both, and I don't see the win of making people look in both
places. Close enough to All the entries are sufficiently identifiable,
it seemed to me.

I see the note about ltx-help.el using the node name "Command Index"; we
can leave an @anchor behind so it still works (or should), in case
anyone still cares about that.

Wdyt? -k



More information about the latexrefman mailing list