[latexrefman-discuss] minor typo
Vincent Belaïche
vincent.belaiche at domain.hid
Tue Sep 8 22:51:51 CEST 2015
Hello Johannes,
Thank you for your report.
My comments below...
Le 08/09/2015 21:56, Johannes Böttcher a écrit :
> minor typo:
>
> --- latex2e.texi 2015-07-26 17:40:26.428983059 +0200
> +++ diff 2015-09-08 21:46:10.132162335 +0200
> @@ -2109,7 +2109,7 @@
>
> @item h
> (Here)---at the position in the text where the @code{figure} environment
> -appears. However, @code{t} is not allowed by itself; @code{t} is
> +appears. However, @code{h} is not allowed by itself; @code{t} is
> automatically added.
>
Which revision are you talling about, in te latest one (425), there is
However, @code{h} is not allowed by itself; @code{t} is
automatically added.
Please note that you get the latest development version by on the two
following commands:
Checkout over SVN protocol (TCP 3690):
svn co svn://svn.gna.org/svn/latexrefman/trunk latexrefman
Checkout over http:
svn co http://svn.gna.org/svn/latexrefman/trunk latexrefman
You can also get it via the Web interface, for a list of all revisions:
http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/latexrefman/trunk/latex2e.texi?view=log
For the revision 425 (latest as of today):
http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/latexrefman/trunk/latex2e.texi?revision=425&view=markup
> @cindex here, putting floats
>
>
>
>
> -----
>
> On a different matter (2135):
> The standard @code{report} and @code{article} classes use the default placement
> @code{tbp}.
>
>
> Same goes for @code{book}.
>
>
> Line 3171 says the same, but now there are brakets.
> placement @code{[tbp]}.
>
>
>
> Thanks for looking into this
> Johannes Böttcher
>
Well, I could not find the string `[tbp]' in the whole document in
latest development revision.
VBR,
Vincent Belaïche
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
http://www.avast.com
More information about the latexrefman
mailing list