[latexrefman-discuss] minor typo

Vincent Belaïche vincent.belaiche at domain.hid
Tue Sep 8 22:51:51 CEST 2015


Hello Johannes,

Thank you for your report.

My comments below...

Le 08/09/2015 21:56, Johannes Böttcher a écrit :
> minor typo:
>
> --- latex2e.texi    2015-07-26 17:40:26.428983059 +0200
> +++ diff    2015-09-08 21:46:10.132162335 +0200
> @@ -2109,7 +2109,7 @@
>
>  @item h
>  (Here)---at the position in the text where the @code{figure} environment
> -appears.  However, @code{t} is not allowed by itself; @code{t} is
> +appears.  However, @code{h} is not allowed by itself; @code{t} is
>  automatically added.
>

Which revision are you talling about, in te latest one (425), there is 

    However, @code{h} is not allowed by itself; @code{t} is
    automatically added.

Please note that you get the latest development version by on the two
following commands:

Checkout over SVN protocol (TCP 3690):
svn co svn://svn.gna.org/svn/latexrefman/trunk latexrefman

Checkout over http:
svn co http://svn.gna.org/svn/latexrefman/trunk latexrefman


You can also get it via the Web interface, for a list of all revisions:

http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/latexrefman/trunk/latex2e.texi?view=log

For the revision 425 (latest as of today):

http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/latexrefman/trunk/latex2e.texi?revision=425&view=markup


>  @cindex here, putting floats
>
>
>
>
> -----
>
> On a different matter (2135):
> The standard @code{report} and @code{article} classes use the default placement
> @code{tbp}.
>
>
> Same goes for @code{book}.
>
>
> Line 3171 says the same, but now there are brakets.
> placement @code{[tbp]}.
>
>
>
> Thanks for looking into this
> Johannes Böttcher
>

Well, I could not find the string `[tbp]' in the whole document in
latest development revision.

VBR,
	Vincent Belaïche 


---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
http://www.avast.com





More information about the latexrefman mailing list