[latex3-commits] [l3svn] r6694 - Add comment concerning \csstring (closes #311)

[Joseph Wright]

On 01/09/2016 16:36, noreply at latex-project.org wrote:
> The consensus is to wait and see if LuaTeX's primitives
> stick around.  Besides, as Joseph feared there is some
> engine variation for the empty csname (LuaTeX's \csstring
> does better than our \cs_to_str:N in my view).

Not sure that the empty csname counts as N-type, so arguably if that is
the only issue we could gain some performance.

Joseph